To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Before stating the main theorem, we would like to recall the basic properties of the “zeta-functions” attached to cusp forms on SL (2, ℤ). Let k be an even integer ≥ 12 and f a cusp form of weight k on SL (2, ℤ) with q-expansion We shall assume that c1 = 1, and that f is an eigenfunction of the Hecke operators. Define φ(s) as the Dirichlet series The series and the product
over the primes are equal and absolutely convergent for Re (S) > ½(k + 1).
A higher-order, double boundary-layer theory is employed to investigate the mass transport velocity due to two-dimensional standing waves in a system consisting of two semi-infinite, homogeneous fluids of different densities and viscosities. For moderately large wave amplitudes, the leading correction to the tangential mass transport velocity near the interface is extremely significant and may typically contribute about 20% of the total velocity.
A natural and welcomed decomposition theorem for elements in the positive cone of the tensor product of Archimedean vector lattices leads to substantial simplifications in the theory of tensor products of Archimedean vector lattices.
This second part follows on directly from the first part that appears on pages 125–156 of this volume. The references for this part are included amongst the references appearing at the end of the first part.
We denote by S the unit sphere in ℝ3, and µ is the rotationally invariant measure, generalizing surface area on S; thus µS = 4π. We identify directions (or unit vectors) in ℝ3 with points on S, and prove the following:
Theorem 1. If E is a subset of ℝ3 of Lebesgue measure zero, then for µ almost all directions α, every plane normal to α intersects E in a set of plane measure zero.
Recently the notion of elementary symmetrization attracted new attention in the field of convex sets (see [L; W]), and it was proved that Minkowski's “Quermassintegrale” are decreased by elementary symmetrization. On the other hand, the concept of Schwarz symmetrization for Borel functions gained new interest from its possible applications in the field of elliptic partial differential equations (see [S1, S2, HI, T1, T2, HY1, HY2, GL1, GL2]).
A study complementary to Part 1 (Smith 1979) is made of the linear stability characteristics, at high Reynolds number (R), of Poiseuille How through tubes with closed cross-sections. The first significant deviation of the upper branch of the neutral stability curve (Part 1 having described the lower bilanch) from that of plane Poiseuille flow arises when the aspect ratio is decreased from infinity to O(R1/11). The axial wavenumber α on the upper branch is then O(R-1/11). A further decrease of the aspect ratio, to a finite value, forces this α to fall sharply to O(R-1). A similar phenomenon occurs for the lower branch (Part 1). Thus the two branches are likely to meet only when the aspect ratio becomes finite, with the neutrally stable disturbances then having very large axial length scales.
Let be a finite sequence of positive integers. If we want to show that contains primes, or at least almost-primes (i.e. numbers with few prime factors), sieve methods give better results if weights of a certain kind are attached to the elements of .
‘ … it will afford me much satisfaction if, by means of this book, I shall succeed in arousing interest among English mathematicians in a branch of pure mathematics which becomes the more fascinating the more it is studied.’
W. Burnside, in his preface to Theory of groups of finite order, 1897.
Preliminary definitions
It is presumed that the reader will already be familiar with the contents of this section. He is advised to read it quickly, in order to accustom himself to the notation which will be used throughout the rest of the book.
If X is a finite set, a permutation of X is a one-to-one correspondence (bisection) α : X → X. Two such permutations α, β can be composed to give the permutation αβ : X → X, which we shall define by the rule αβ(x) = α(β(x)). That is, we shall write functions on the left, and compose in the order compatible with this convention. Under the operation of composition the set of all permutations of X forms a group Sym(X), the symmetric group on X. If X is the set {1, 2, …, n}, we write Sn for Sym(X), and we have |sn | = n! where we use | to denote cardinality.
If G is a subgroup of Sym(X), then we shall say that the pair (G, X) is a permutation group of degree | x |, and that G acts on X. More generally, we shall meet the situation where there is a homomorphism g ⇝ ĝ of a group G into Sym(X): this will be called a permutation representation of G.
This book replaces an earlier one, entitled ‘Finite Groups of Automorphisms’ (No. 6 in the L. M. S. Lecture Note Series). When it became clear that the original book was still in demand, it was decided that a complete revision was preferable to a reprint. In this way we hoped to incorporate the fruits of experience, gleaned from readers' comments, and at the same time, to keep the book up-to-date by introducing some new material.
The entire book has been rewritten. In some sections of Chapters 1, 2 and 3 the earlier version has been followed quite closely, while in others (notably 1. 5, 1. 6, 2. 4, 2. 5, 3. 4, 3. 5), the material is treated differently. Chapter 4 (Groups and Graphs) is presented from a new viewpoint, beginning with the graphical representation of permutation groups. The algebraic theory of the adjacency matrix has been restricted to the case of strongly regular graphs, since the generalization to graphs of larger diameter is discussed elsewhere (reference [1] of Chapter 4). The material on the Higman-Sims group has been amplified. Chapter 5 (Maps) is completely new. We hope that its inclusion will lead to renewed interest in a subject where ideas from many different areas of mathematics come together.
We have tried to make the book suitable for use as a course text at advanced undergraduate or postgraduate level. For this reason, there are thirteen ‘project’ sections, which should provide a good test of a student's real understanding of the text. The topics treated in the project sections are occasionally needed in subsequent chapters. (See also the note below.)
‘The Descriptive-Geometry Theorem that any map whatever can have its divisions properly distinguished by the use of but four colours, from its generality and intangibility, seems to have aroused a good deal of interest some few years ago …’
P. J. Heawood, in his paper Map-Colour Theorem, 1890.
Maps and surfaces
In this chapter we shall discuss graphs realized by a set of points and lines on a closed orientable surface. Although this notion arises in a topological context, we shall show that it is possible to develop it by purely combinatorial arguments. The reader who is unfamiliar with the topology of surfaces should not be at a disadvantage.
We begin at an intuitive level. For our purposes, it is sufficient to say that a ‘surface’ is a compact topological space which has two special properties:
(i) it is locally homeomorphic to ordinary Euclidean 2-space;
(ii) it has a consistent global orientation.
The sphere and the torus are the simplest examples. The Euclidean plane is not compact, and so it is not a ‘surface’ for us; however, it may be made homeomorphic to a sphere by the addition of a single point, and so the two spaces have very similar properties. The Klein bottle is not allowed, since it has no consistent global orientation.
Let us suppose that a graph Γ is represented by a set of points and lines on a surface, in such a way that the lines intersect only at the points representing their end vertices.