Recent archaeological and remote sensing research in the Maya Lowlands has demonstrated evidence for extensive modification of the landscape in the forms of channeled fields and upland terraces. Scholars often assume these measures were taken primarily to intensify maize production; however, paleoethnobotany highlights a greater diversity of crops grown by the precolonial Maya. This study combines the growth requirements of 18 crops cultivated by ancient Maya farmers with lidar and other geospatial data in a suitability model that maps optimal areas for growth. These 18 crops cluster into five groups of crops with similar growth requirements. Across the study region, different groupings of crops had different suitability in and around different ancient Maya centers and agricultural features. This spatial variation in suitability reflects the heterogeneity of land resources and adaptations and contributes to existing conversations about economic and settlement organization in the study area. The results of this study serve as a foundation for future field studies and more complex spatial models.

This article examines the relationship between relationality and policy in tort law from an evolutionary perspective. While, as part of the regulatory system, tort law must evolve in response to structural and allocative policy concerns, its ability to do so is limited by the relational normative structure through which it operates and claims moral authority. This tension is often obscured in mainstream tort theory. Drawing on contractualist philosophy—which traces the implications of mutual recognition and respect across structural, allocative, and relational normative contexts—the article develops a principled reasoning framework that avoids rigid hierarchies and ad hoc balancing: negative policy reasons not to adopt tort norms take precedence in choices of regulatory regimes, while positive policy reasons must be diluted and integrated with relational reasons to shape the content of tort norms. This normative framework illuminates tort law’s ability to respond to complex normative challenges while retaining its integrity and unique value as a regulatory tool.

Machine listening takes place through sonification. Sound is treated as data by a computer that listens by deconstructing and reconstructing sound. To better explore the aesthetic, relational and ontological aspects of machine listening, this article reflects upon the Fourier analysis, which is vital for machine learning algorithms. It then outlines the listening modes articulated by French composer Pierre Schaeffer and updates them for the new material conditions of contemporary listening. It proposes that a new mode, identified while working with sonification, be added to Schaeffer’s classic array. It explores non-human listening among machines that listen with other concerns beyond the human need to interpret content. Thus, this article makes a particular strategic move: it centres around machine listening, which enables computers to perform analyses of a soundscape, and resynthesis, a mode of sonification that treats sound as data, to reintroduce the ‘sound object’ nature of resynthesised sounds. It looks at sonification through discourse analysis and media archaeology, and gives importance to experiments in art that privilege sensorial and affective dimensions often ignored by scientific approaches. It proposes that thinking about machine listening through sonification can assist in developing sensibilities that are more responsive to the present sonic ecologies between human and non-human listeners.

For 2025, three new additions will be made to the instructions for authors. This includes an updated policy on P values, more detailed instructions for educational studies, and the use of existing reporting guidelines for many study designs.

People of low socioeconomic status (SES) are often underrepresented in biomedical research. The importance of demographically diverse research samples is widely recognized, especially given socioeconomic disparities in health, but have been challenging to achieve. One barrier to research participation by low SES individuals is their distance from research centers and the difficulty of traveling. This article examines the promise of portable magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) for enrolling participants of diverse SES in structural neuroimaging studies, and anticipates some of the challenges, practical and ethical, that may arise in the course of such research.

Flanking policies – policies that aim to address potential negative effects of trade liberalization, and/or the concerns of domestic stakeholders regarding those negative effects, and that are either legally or factually linked to trade liberalization – have been a critical component of international trade policy since at least 1962. Over the years, however, flanking policies have changed. This Article argues that there is a heretofore unnoticed distinction between what I term first-generation flanking policies and second-generation flanking policies. Specifically, first-generation flanking policies target negative economic effects, or costs, of trade liberalization experienced within the enacting country. Trade adjustment assistance is the paradigmatic example. By contrast, second-generation flanking policies target non-economic costs that arise outside of the enacting country. Examples include the European Union's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, Deforestation-free Products Regulation, and the United States' Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Because second-generation flanking policies directly target foreign activity, they often employ more trade-distorting policies – tariffs, imports bans, and associated administrative hurdles for imports – than first-generation flanking policies, which more often relied on domestic subsidies. Moreover, they reflect a significant reorientation of the limits of state authority in international trade law. Whereas authority to tax and regulate production in international economic law has historically been based primarily on a territorial link to productive activity, second-generation flanking policies target production but rely on a territorial nexus with consumption of goods and services.

Fifty years ago, George J. Annas and Joseph Healey introduced the concept of a “patient rights advocate” in their seminal 1974 article published in the Vanderbilt Law Review. Annas expanded this vision in the ACLU Handbook, The Rights of Hospitalized Patients, later broadening its scope to all medical settings. This essay traces the evolution of patient advocacy, highlighting pivotal milestones: the advent of cancer navigators, the rise of the patient safety movement, the establishment of patient advocacy organizations, the development of Patient Advocate Offices in hospitals, and the emergence of independent advocates with board certification. It also examines the impact of advocacy on healthcare outcomes, costs, and patient-provider satisfaction, and explores future directions for this vital and growing profession.