Dickite and kaolinite are polymorphs of Al4(Si4O10)(OH)8. Dickite traditionally is regarded as hydrothermal, based on field and laboratory evidence. Dickite and kaolinite occur in cavities in phylloid algal limestones, in interstices of biocalcarenites and sandstones, and along joints, fractures, and stylolites, in Pennsylvanian rocks exposed throughout 9600 square miles of southeastern Kansas. The stratigraphic interval of approximately 1100 ft extends from the Fort Scott Limestone (Desmoinesian) through the Lecompton Limestone (Virgilian). The best crystallized dickites are found in porous algal limestones as pockets of glistening white powder composed of well developed pseudohexagonal plates up to 40 μ across. Very well crystallized kaolinites occur similarly, except the crystals are much smaller. Less well crystallized dickites and b-axis disordered kaolinites occur in less porous rocks. Variations in crystal size and morphological development are genetically significant.

Dickite-kaolinite distribution is related to: (1) stratigraphic alternation of limestones and impervious shales; (2) gentle, westward regional dip; (3) thick, mound-like buildups of highly porous algal limestones, miles in length and width; (4) igneous intrusions (early Tertiary?) in Woodson and Wilson counties. Dickite is confined to an elliptical area 125 miles long northeast-southwest, extending 60 miles eastward from the intrusions. Dickite is associated preferentially with porous algal mounds. Kaolinite occurs in less porous rocks within the dickite area, and also is abundant well beyond. Heated groundwaters, possibly mixed with magmatic waters, moved readily up-dip and along strike outward from the intrusions through the conduit-like algal mounds; dickite was deposited from such solutions. Where water movement was restricted or where water had travelled tens of miles from the intrusions, water temperature fell below the limit for dickite crystallization, and kaolinite precipitated instead. Kansas dickite, unlike most other reported dickites, formed in rocks that were neither deeply buried nor extensively altered hydrothermally.

This article relates Chesterton’s theology, and that of other theologians, to existing theories of humor. It asks: With regard to the understanding of humor, what is offered by a theological perspective—especially by Chesterton’s theology—that cannot be supplied by philosophical and psychological theories? The article situates Chesterton’s work in relation to three theories of humor: the superiority theory, the release theory, and the incongruity theory. It then examines two important relationships: first, that between humor, worship, and joy; then, that between humor, cognition, and theology. While focusing on Chesterton’s writing, it also considers relevant aspects of the work of other thinkers, including Ian Ker, Duncan Reyburn, Thomas Aquinas, Søren Kierkegaard, Reinhold Niebuhr, Karl Rahner, Peter Berger, Ingvild Sælid Gilhus, Terry Lindvall, and Brian Edgar. The article concludes by suggesting the beginnings of an outline of a theology of humor.

A method is described for quantitatively expressing orientation of kaolinite particles in a wet clay mass. Wet clay is impregnated with a polyalcohol which permits grinding of a very flat surface (without disrupting the original fabric) for quantitative X-ray measurement. In the specific procedure discussed, a Norelco diffractometer equipped with a pole figure device and a Geiger detector was employed to measure by reflection the diffracted intensity of the 002 and 020 kaolinite reflections. The amplitude of the 002 peak to the amplitude of the 020 peak is called the peak ratio, PK, which quantitatively expresses particle orientation at any chosen angle to the specimen surface. Limits of orientation are random and maximum orientation. For the kaolinite tested, truly random orientation was achieved which gave a PR = 2.0. Maximum orientation found experimentally was PR = 200 for thoroughly dispersed slurry slowly dried on a glass slide. Vertical and lateral variations can be measured either continuously or in steps of any chosen size.

“Kaolinites” from classic, large deposits of kaolin are shown commonly in scanning electron micrographs to be mixtures, at least in part, in microdimensions, of kaolin-mineral polymorphs.

Artificial mixtures of selected kaolin polymorphs simulating the natural mixtures, also micrographed, show crystallinities intermediate between the crystallinities of the end members in X-ray powder diffractograms. Thus, apparent crystallinity interpreted from diffractograms of a kaolin specimen may be a product of kaolin-mineral mixture in microdimensions as well as from ordering in the crystals. Evaluation of the crystallinity of a kaolin from powder diffraction may be suspect if independent means, such as SEM, are not used to assess the monomineralic character of that kaolin specimen.

Analogous to the apparent crystallinity of a “kaolinite” being the product of a mixture, so may other widely ranging properties of “kaolinite” be products of kaolin-mineral mixtures in microdimensions. These properties include DTA, IR, chemical composition, free energies of formation, and industrial applications.

Specifications for a monomineralic, nearly ideal kaolinite are considered—the Keokuk geode variety possesses desired crystallographic and chemical properties.

Feroxyhite (δ′-FeOOH) in association with goethite and lepidocrocite was found as a dominant mineral in some rusty precipitates from Finland. These precipitates formed in the interstices of sand grains from rapidly flowing, Fe(II)-containing water which was very quickly oxidized as it flowed through the sediment. The mineral is distinguished from other FeOOH forms and from ferrihydrite mainly by its X-ray powder diffractogram. Further characteristics are an acicular morphology (possibly thin, rolled plates), an internal magnetic field at 4°K of ∼510 kOe, Fe-OH stretching bands at ∼2900 cm−1 and Fe-OH bending bands at 1110, 920, 790, and 670 cm−1, and an oxalate solubility between ferrihydrite and goethite or lepidocrocite. Feroxyhites with very similar properties were synthesized by oxidation of an Fe(II) solution with H2O2 at a pH between 5 and 8.

Other layer silicates are consistently present as impurities in natural montmorillonite samples. They have a distinctly different morphology from the common montmorillonite particles. The selected area electron diffraction (SAD) of these impurities display unusually sharp spot patterns with triclinic, monoclinic and hexagonal symmetries. These impurities are most likely micas, which are easily detectable with X-rays in the coarser fractions (> 10 μm) of the samples.

The crystal structure model with the space group C2 for montmorillonite single layer has an unusual configuration of OH’s and vacancies for a dioctahedral layer silicate. Our intensity calculations do not bring a conclusive evidence for distinguishing the two possible space groups C2 and C2/m on the observed SAD patterns of montmorillonite.

The SAD of the thin montmorillonite flakes in Cheto, Camp-Berteaux and Wyoming samples display uniform ring, circular arcs and spotty ring patterns, respectively. These patterns indicate different modes of association of crystallites or different arrangements of elementary layers within them.

The current situation in Dutch museum archives is heavily influenced by developments in the museum sector in recent decades. The privatization of Dutch museums in the 1990s and the subsequent variations in legal character among these institutions has resulted in inconsistent management structures and inexplicit legal obligations, which have slowed the development of a cohesive approach to the management of museum archives in the Netherlands. Research conducted by Roosmarijn Ubink into the current state of information and archive management in the Dutch museum sector has revealed a structural lack of resources and frameworks for the management of museums’ institutional archives. Beginning in 2022, museum archivists and information professionals in the Netherlands have come together to respond to this situation.

Chlorite and illite are the major clay minerals in silicate assemblages from a rock salt bed in the Vernon Formation (Upper Silurian) at Retsof, New York. Textural features and Br content of the salt indicate precipitation from shallow marine brine with no subsequent postdepositional recrystallization. Sample mounting procedure for electron microprobe analysis involves clay particle dispersion, sedimentation, and transferral to a planar silver print surface. The 001 face of the flake, rather than the conventional polished plane, constitutes the analyzed surface. Microprobe analysis of the chlorite (80 grains from four samples) yields a mean aggregate Mg-rich clinochlore composition of

$$(M{g_{4.51}}Fe_{0.23}^ + A{l_{1.21}})(A{l_{1.09}}S{i_{2.91}}){O_{10}}{(OH)_{8,}}$$

$${{\rm{K}}_{0.85}}(A{l_{1.61}}Fe_{0.20}^{3 + }M{g_{0.23}})(A{l_{0.76}}S{i_{3.24}}){O_{10}}{(OH)_2}$$

Diagenesis effected improved crystallinity and undoubtedly involved isochemical recrystallization of the bulk silicate assemblage. Metasomatism of the assemblage during diagenesis, however, appears to be negligible.

An attempt has been made to assemble the best thermodynamic information currently available for soil minerals in the Al2O3-SiO2-H2O system at 25°C and 1 atm. Montmorillonite is included by considering its aluminum silicate phase. Diagrams are presented so that the stability of the minerals can be visualized in relation to the ionic environment. Although the Al2O3-SiO2-H2O system is a very simple one compared to soils and sediments, the stability diagrams depict a mineral stability sequence and mineral pair associations that are in good agreement with natural relations.

According to the stability diagram, mineral pairs that can form in intimate association are gibbsite-kaolinite, kaolinite-montmorillonite, and montmorillonite-amorphous silica. Forbidden pairs are amorphous silica-kaolinite, amorphous silica-gibbsite, and montmorillonite-gibbsite. The formation of intimate mixtures of three or more of these minerals is also forbidden. The stability diagrams predict ion activity relationships that are in reasonable agreement with those obtained from soils and sediments.

Amorphous silica probably limits high silica levels, with montmorillonite also forming at high silica levels. Kaolinite forms at intermediate and gibbsite at low silica levels. These minerals in turn probably control the activity of aluminum ions at a level appropriate to the pH. The formation of gibbsite, kaolinite, montmorillonite and amorphous silica appears to be controlled by a combination of kinetics and equilibria. That is, the kinetic dissolution of unstable silicates appears to control the H4SiO4 level. The new mineral(s) most stable at that H4SiO4 level appear to precipitate in response to solution equilibria.

New and published experimental data on hydrothermally treated (2-kbar water pressure, 300–400°C natural clay minerals is used to construct phase diagrams in composition and pressure-temperature space which define the phase relations of mixed layering solid solution in dioctahedral (illite-montmorillonite) and trioctahedral expanding chlorite and corrensite-like minerals. Three major relations are established:

1. (1) The R3+, i.e. Al13+ and/or Fe3+, content of the assemblage will control whether or not an expanding chlorite or corrensite phase will appear. These minerals are R3+-rich in composition as well as R2+ (Mg and Fe2+)-rich.

2. (2) Temperature-pressure variables control the type and composition of the mixed layered illite-montmorillonite mineral which is stable with aluminous phases. A sequence of different types of mixed layered ordering can be established which might be correlated with diagenetic or epimetamorphic grade.

3. (3) The presence of ‘metamorphic’ trioctahedral phyllosilicate phases, i.e. those due to the effects of earliest metamorphism, is correlated with the P-T-X variables. These phases include 7 Å chlorite (iron-rich), 14 Å chlorite and the expanding chlorite and corrensite-like minerals.

It is not possible to give absolute temperatures for the different reactions implied by the phase diagram due to the slow rate of crystallization in the experiments. However, the general sequence of assemblages and the phase relations proposed should correspond to those which are encountered in nature when pressure and temperature vary.

Transhumanists claim that futuristic technologies will permit you to live indefinitely as a nonbiological ‘posthuman’ with a radically improved quality of life. Philosophers have pointed out that whether some radically enhanced posthuman is really you depends on perplexing issues about the nature of personal identity. In this paper, I present an especially pressing version of the personal-identity challenge to transhumanism, based on the ideas of Derek Parfit. Parfit distinguishes two main views of personal identity, an intuitive, nonreductive view and a revisionary, reductive view. I argue that the standard rationale for wanting to become a posthuman makes sense only if the intuitive view is correct, but that the standard rationale for thinking that it is possible to become a posthuman makes sense only if the revisionary view is correct. Following this, I explain why the obvious responses are unsatisfactory or imply the need to rethink transhumanism in ways that make it much less radical and less appealing.