To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Fossil fuel companies no longer deny anthropogenic climate change in litigation, but they challenge the validity of climate science in establishing legal responsibility. Research on climate litigation, social movements, and legal mobilization has focused primarily on plaintiffs’ perspectives, showing how they use the judicial process as a site of knowledge production. This article shifts the focus onto defendants, conducting an analysis of scientific disputes in major climate change lawsuits and developing a typology grounded in both empirical analysis and theoretical insights for studying their arguments about science and evidence. Corporate defendants build evidentiary counter-narratives, challenge the substantive quality of plaintiffs’ claims, and contest the scientific integrity of compromising evidence. The future impact of such litigation will hinge on how courts evaluate climate research as legal evidence, and whether corporate defendants are successful in their efforts to reframe, undermine, and discredit the science.
To audit data on clinical outcomes and suicidal ideation, as part of a service evaluation, in individuals presenting with low mood at an Irish frontline, community-based, rural psychology service, to determine whether the intervention provided was effective in reducing suicidal ideation and low mood.
Method:
Clinical outcome data from 428 service users who scored in the clinical range for depression and who completed an intervention with the service were audited to determine if scores on suicidal and self-harm ideation – as measured by PHQ9 Q9 – changed between assessment and discharge.
Results:
91% of service users who scored in the clinical range for depression and expressed suicidal or self-harm ideation at assessment reported an improvement post-intervention. At discharge, 85% of these individuals no longer reported any suicidal or self-harm ideation. A majority (68.5%) of those who reported ideation at assessment, and a majority of those who did not report ideation (78%), achieved reliable change (i.e. an improvement of ≥5pts) in their final PHQ-9 scores. Clinical recovery was achieved by discharge in 69% of those without and 47% of those with ideation at assessment. Not reporting suicidal or self-harm ideation at assessment was statistically more likely to result in reliable change at discharge than reporting such ideation.
Conclusions:
Results from this clinical service evaluation suggest swift access to psychological intervention, by this rural, frontline primary care psychology service, was associated with reductions in levels of suicidal and self-harm ideation in those suffering from depressive symptoms in the clinical range.
This response provides two examples for which an understanding of the biology of stress has informed approaches to supporting children. In the first, educators at the University of Cambridge Primary School are trained to view children’s behavior as a reflection of their needs and to utilise a variety of support strategies, including coaching, non-violent communication, careful language choices and emotional health education. In the second, the Yoga Story Time project, implemented in an at-risk school in Sicily, aimed to support the well-being of children who had experienced trauma. Through interactive storytelling, creative activities and yoga poses, the project sought to improve children’s communication skills, emotional regulation and social interaction.
What would it mean to build an archive not of texts or images, but of tastes, sounds, silences, and gestures, the fleeting traces through which memory takes shape? This essay proposes “taste archives” as a method within the public humanities for engaging communities around everyday acts of remembering and belonging. Beginning with chai as a personal anchor of migrant memory, I move outward to imagine a framework for archiving food-related stories and practices. The process unfolds in three movements: (1) gathering oral histories through food-centered conversations; (2) recording recipes, smells, tastes, and the sonic-material rhythms that accompany them; and (3) curating these into accessible, community-based collections, whether in libraries, cultural centers, or digital spaces. Along the way, I reflect on questions of consent, ownership, and the difficulty of translating sensory experience into archival form. “Taste archives,” I suggest, democratize heritage by placing ordinary rituals-meals, drinks, shared preparation at the center of cultural memory. By making the invisible histories of migration and daily life tangible and audible, the public humanities can reimagine the archive itself as something that can be sipped, smelled, and heard: a living practice of remembering together.
This paper proposes a method for reconstructing three-dimensional turbulent flows from sparse measurements without the need for ground truth data during training. A weight-sharing network is developed to infer the full flow fields from measurements of velocity sampled at three planes and boundary pressure at one additional plane, inspired by experimental configurations. The weight-sharing network shares identical parameters along homogeneous directions, which results in efficient data utilization and reduced computational memory requirements. First, we compare the weight-sharing network to the PC-DualConvNet, adapted from prior work, by reconstructing a 3D Kolmogorov flow from noise-free measurements with a snapshot-enforced loss. Both networks accurately recover time-averaged 3D flow fields and the correct energy spectrum up to wavenumber 10. The weight-sharing network has the ability to infer flow structures distant from measurement planes. Second, we carry out reconstruction from measurements corrupted with white noise (SNR 15) using a mean-enforced loss. We show that, for the weight-sharing network, validation sensor loss on unseen data decreases with training sensor loss—unlike PC-DualConvNet. This shows that the training sensor loss is a good estimate of the generalization error. The weight-sharing network offers good generalization, parameter efficiency, and hyperparameter robustness. The proposed method opens the possibility of three-dimensional flow reconstruction from experiments.
Populations of Paracentrotus lividus have been widely studied across their geographic range due to their key role as herbivores capable of transforming benthic communities. However, no comprehensive population assessment had previously been conducted in the Canary Islands. We carried out an extensive survey between 2006 and 2009 across five islands and the northern islets of Lanzarote, sampling both intertidal and subtidal habitats. Sea urchin abundance, algal composition, and physical variables were recorded to identify spatial patterns in population distribution. Macroalgal assemblages were grouped into functional categories: turf, Lobophora, brown erect algae, red bushy algae, and crustose corallines. Lobophora showed a strong negative relationship with P. lividus abundance, whereas brown erect algae were associated with the highest sea urchin densities. Island identity emerged as a major structuring factor, particularly in the subtidal, revealing a clear archipelagic gradient: populations were nearly absent in the westernmost island (El Hierro) and progressively more abundant toward the eastern islands. Wave exposure also significantly influenced abundance and size structure, although effects differed between habitats. In subtidal zones, P. lividus was more abundant in exposed areas, whereas intertidal densities peaked at intermediate exposure levels. At smaller spatial scales, substrates characterized by higher structural complexity and porosity supported greater sea urchin abundance. By integrating environmental drivers across spatial scales, this study highlights the combined influence of habitat structure, algal composition, and hydrodynamic conditions in shaping P. lividus distribution, providing a baseline for future management and conservation strategies in oceanic island systems.
A global increase in severe group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections has been reported following the COVID-19 pandemic, but data from Asia remain limited. We examined epidemiology and clinical characteristics of severe paediatric GAS infections across 86 Japanese hospitals, focusing on patients under 18 years of age, hospitalized between 1 January 2019 and 31 March 2024. Severe GAS infection was defined by the isolation of GAS from sterile sites, or from non-sterile sites under specific conditions, such as streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS). A total of 83 cases were analysed. Cases increased from the summer of 2023, exceeding pre-pandemic levels. The median age was 4 (interquartile range: 1–8) years, with the highest number among 1-year-olds. No cases were reported in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Only 6% (5/83) of the cases had preceding GAS pharyngitis. Pneumonia was the most prevalent diagnosis (25%), with 76% of these cases being complicated by empyema, often necessitating intensive care or surgical intervention. Only 17% (14/83) of cases were reported as STSS in Japan’s national surveillance system. This study represents the first multicentre nationwide hospital-based investigation of severe paediatric GAS infections in Japan, identifying the recent increase in cases, thereby highlighting limitations of current STSS-based surveillance.
Hostility towards parties has never ceased; revisiting Hans Kelsen’s ideas is particularly significant today when critiques of parties are meeting the revival of the myth of People as One, which Kelsen devoted much of his work as a legal scholar and political theorist to opposing. Kelsen addressed the issue of parties at two significant historical moments when the constitutional government was succumbing to the assault of autocracy (Fascism and Nazism) and revolutionary experimentations (Bolshevism) and when parties regained momentum with the Cold War. These were two very different circumstances: in the former, the issue was opposing and resisting monocratic dictatorship; in the latter, the issue was defending party pluralism within liberal democracy itself. Kelsen never resorted to ‘militant democracy’ to protect democracy. The reason was both theoretical and empirical. As a ‘formalist’, Kelsen kept substantive politics out of procedural politics, which he considered normative or ‘not metaphysical’ because its task was channelling public doing and not achieving certain specific goals; the sole purpose of the rules of the game was the exercise and reproduction over time of political freedom. Therefore, pluralism, legal equality, and individual liberties were non-negotiable norms of democracy, whose process was based on the spirit of compromise and majority rule.
Contemporary constitutional theorists typically assume that a system of constitutional adjudication inevitably stands in tension with a majoritarian understanding of democracy. Kelsen’s influential defence of constitutional review, by contrast, goes along with an affirmation of a procedural and majoritarian understanding of democracy. Did Kelsen fail to spot the supposed conflict between constitutional review and democracy? Or did he identify a solution to the counter-majoritarian difficulty? Michel Troper has vigorously argued that Kelsen’s defence of constitutional review is confused and fails to cohere with his conception of democracy. This chapter defends Kelsen’s argument for constitutional review against Troper’s charges. It argues both that Kelsen’s case for constitutional review is fundamentally sound and that it carries the potential to make an important contribution to contemporary debates on the legitimacy of judicial control of constitutionality. Kelsen’s argument for constitutional review offers a compelling case for constitutional review that focuses on the conditions of the proper functioning of electoral democracy rather than on the protection of liberal rights.
Multi-party, representative democracy is, according to Kelsen, an intrinsically fragile achievment – one that never can nor should be taken for granted. The fragility of multi-party democracies, based on party pluralism and free, competitive elections is the topic he explores in a lesser-know work published in the mid 1930s: La Dictature du Parti (1935). It focuses upon the underlying weaknesses of European interwar democracies which make possible their transformation into party dictatorships. The chapter explores Kelsen’s broader theoretical framework and contribution through a comparative analysis with those in the contemporaneous, early work of Franz Neumann, The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern Society (1936), which, through a critique of Kelsen’s legal positivism, developed a distinctive, sociological approach to the relationship between law and state. The comparison of the two works reveals the significant engagement of Continental political theory and jurisprudence, throughout the 1930s, with the question of the underlying fragility of European interwar democracies. It, thereby, adds depth and breadth to the study of the genesis of Kelsen’s theory of democracy allowing one to capture more vividly the argument at the core of his La Dictature du Parti: the transformation of democracy into autocracy rests not on the dissolution of the rule of law and the rise of a state without law (as for Neumann), but on the transformation of the very content of the legal system.
This article explores phenomenological open graphic notation as an effective scoring method for instrumentalists engaging with chaotic systems in interactive electroacoustic music. Open graphic notation has long provided composers with a means of fostering interpretative freedom in musical performance. The subjective nature of open graphic scores establishes a dynamic relationship between the score and the performer that parallels the interactions between musicians and chaotic systems in interactive electroacoustic music. Chaotic systems, characterised by their non-linear and unpredictable behaviour, often necessitate improvisatory approaches rather than reliance on fixed notation. However, notation can serve as a structural framework, affording composers greater formal control while supporting performers who may be less accustomed to improvisation. How, then, might notation be used with chaotic systems in interactive electroacoustic music? Drawing on phenomenological concepts such as the lived body, embodied action and Gestalt perception, this notational approach can provide a structured yet flexible means of guiding performer–system interactions. The author presents three recent compositions as case studies, demonstrating how phenomenological open graphic notation can shape and mediate the performer’s engagement with chaotic systems in interactive electroacoustic music.
This manifesto emphasises the need to move beyond traditional, siloed approaches to education and embrace transdisciplinarity, particularly in the context of the rapidly changing modern world. Transdisciplinary is about collaborating across the sciences and arts, and including the diverse voices beyond the academic, including those of children and families. The manifesto argues that this can help us move beyond simply preparing for a predicted future and instead enable us to actively shape it together. It explores the concept of transdisciplinary creativities, arguing that knowledge and understanding are not limited to language and traditional academic disciplines and that embodied experiences and engaging multiple senses are crucial for effective learning. This approach challenges the separation between humans and the natural world, recognising the interconnectedness of all things, and proposes that education becomes a process of ‘making-with’, where humans and non-humans engage in collaborative knowledge production.