We sought to describe perspectives among Black nursing professionals and community leaders regarding the return of genetic test results, and place perspectives into context with aggregated findings in the All of Us Research Program’s Data Browser.

Semi-structured, virtual interviews were held with adults (≥18 years of age) self-identifying as Black. A 2-step thematic analysis process was used to assess interviewee perspectives with (sub)themes identified in the literature across two topics: drug/medication response and hereditary disease risk. Themes were placed into context with Data Browser content, focusing on genes and their respective alleles with frequencies ≥0.10 in African ancestry populations in All of Us.

Interviewee perspectives aligned with previously identified major themes in the literature (motivations to engage or disengage; integrating research and care), with five (5) subthemes emerging across major themes. Seven (7) alleles were observed with frequencies ≥0.10 for three (3) pharmacogenomic (PGx) biomarkers in the Data Browser for African ancestry populations: CYP2C19 (SNV, 10-94761900-C-T; SNV,10-94775367-A-G; SNV 10-94781859-G-A), DPYD (SNV, 1-97883329-A-G; SNV, 1-97515839-T-C), UGT1A1 (insertion, 2-233760233-C-CAT; SNV, 2-233757136-G-A). Four (4) alleles were observed with frequencies ≥0.10 for three (3) genes implicated in hereditary disease risk, two of which contemporaneously hold PGx implications for African ancestry populations: CACNA1S (PGx, SNV, 1-201112815-C-T; SNV, 1-201110107-C-T), SCN5A (no PGx, SNV, 3-38603929-T-C), TP53 (PGx, SNV, 17-7676154-G-C).

Our findings convey important clinical and translational science considerations for individuals and community leaders of African ancestry and researchers seeking reputable, publicly available information to understand, communicate, and act on genomic findings.

Findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are synthesised through meta-analyses, which inform evidence-based decision-making. When key details regarding trial outcomes are not fully reported, knowledge synthesis and uptake of findings into clinical practice are impeded.

Our study assessed reporting of primary outcomes in RCTs for older adults with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Trials published between 2011 and 2021, which assessed any intervention for adults aged ≥65 years with a MDD diagnosis, and that specified a single primary outcome were considered for inclusion in our study. Outcome reporting assessment was conducted independently and in duplicate with a 58-item checklist, used in developing the CONSORT-Outcomes statement, and information in each RCT was scored as ‘fully reported’, ‘partially reported’ or ‘not reported’, as applicable.

Thirty-one of 49 RCTs reported one primary outcome and were included in our study. Most trials (71%) did not fully report over half of the 58 checklist items. Items pertaining to outcome analyses and interpretation were fully reported by 65% or more of trials. Items reported less frequently included: outcome measurement instrument properties (varied from 3 to 30%) and justification of the criteria used to define clinically meaningful change (23%).

There is variability in how geriatric depression RCTs report primary outcomes, with omission of details regarding measurement, selection, justification and definition of clinically meaningful change. Outcome reporting deficiencies may hinder replicability and synthesis efforts that inform clinical guidelines and decision-making. The CONSORT-Outcomes guideline should be used when reporting geriatric depression RCTs.

Unsupervised remote digital cognitive assessment makes frequent testing feasible and allows for measurement of learning across days on participants’ own devices. More rapid detection of diminished learning may provide a potentially valuable metric that is sensitive to cognitive change over short intervals. In this study we examine feasibility and predictive validity of a novel digital assessment that measures learning of the same material over 7 days in older adults.

The Boston Remote Assessment for Neurocognitive Health (BRANCH) (Papp et al., 2021) is a web-based assessment administered over 7 consecutive days repeating the same stimuli each day to capture multi-day-learning slopes. The assessment includes Face-Name (verbal-visual associative memory), Groceries-Prices (numeric-visual associative memory), and Digits-Signs (speeded processing of numeric-visual associations). Our sample consisted of200 cognitively unimpaired older adults enrolled in ongoing observational studies (mean age=74.5, 63% female, 87% Caucasian, mean education=16.6) who completed the tasks daily, at home, on their own digital devices. Participants had previously completed in-clinic paper-and-pencil tests to compute a Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite (PACC-5). Mixed-effects models controlling for age, sex, and education were used to observe the associations between PACC-5 scores and both initial performance and multi-day learning on the three BRANCH measures.

Adherence was high with 96% of participants completing all seven days of consecutive assessment; demographic factors were not associated with differences in adherence. Younger participants had higher Day 1 scores all three measures, and learning slopes on Digit-Sign. Female participants performed better on Face-Name (T=3.35, p<.001) and Groceries-Prices (T=2.00, p=0.04) on Day 1 but no sex differences were seen in learning slopes; there were no sex differences on Digit-Sign. Black participants had lower Day 1 scores on Face-Name (T=-3.34, p=0.003) and Digit Sign (T=3.44, p=0.002), but no racial differences were seen on learning slopes for any measure. Education was not associated with any measure. First day performance on Face-Name (B=0.39, p<.001), but not learning slope B=0.008, p=0.302) was associated with the PACC5. For Groceries-Prices, both Day 1 (B=0.27, p<.001) and learning slope (B=0.02, p=0.03) were associated with PACC-5. The Digit-Sign scores at Day 1 (B=0.31, p<.001) and learning slope (B=0.06, p<.001) were also both associated with PACC-5.

Seven days of remote, brief cognitive assessment was feasible in a sample of cognitively unimpaired older adults. Although various demographic factors were associated with initial performance on the tests, multi-day-learning slopes were largely unrelated to demographics, signaling the possibility of its utility in diverse samples. Both initial performance and learning scores on an associative memory and processing speed test were independently related to baseline cognition indicating that these tests’ initial performance and learning metrics are convergent but unique in their contributions. The findings signal the value of measuring differences in learning across days as a means towards sensitively identifying differences in cognitive function before signs of frank impairment are observed. Next steps will involve identifying the optimal way to model multi-day learning on these subtests to evaluate their potential associations with Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers.

The primary intent of cancer treatment is either curative, prolongation of patient life, or to improve patient quality of life; however, treatments are associated with various side effects that may impact patient wellbeing. Thus, understanding the patients’ wellbeing from the patient’s perspective is essential as it could help enable the provision of the necessary support for patients throughout their cancer journey.

We analysed Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) questionnaire responses completed by 19,288 patients over 201,839 visits to our Cancer Centre. As part of their routine and standard of care, patients completing the questionnaire are asked to score 6 physical and 2 psychological symptoms as well as overall wellbeing using an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 means complete absence of the symptom or best overall wellbeing and 10 means worst possible symptom or worst overall wellbeing. We used the ESAS responses to characterise the relationship between the overall wellbeing score and concurrent symptoms scored by cancer patients.

Patients reported tiredness and nausea as the physical symptom causing the most and least distress respectively. Patients that reported severe (7–10) wellbeing also scored high mean scores for tiredness (6·2 ± 2·7), drowsiness (4·7 ± 3·1) and lack of appetite (4·4 ± 3·4). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis suggests higher odds for patients to report moderate-to-severe (4–10) wellbeing when they report moderate-to-severe concurrent symptoms compared to none-to-mild concurrent symptoms.

Our findings suggest that patients’ overall wellbeing as reported by the ESAS system is influenced by a number of concurrent symptoms. Tiredness was found to impact patients’ overall wellbeing to a greater extent than other concurrent symptoms. The sum of physical or psychological symptom scores was stronger indicators of a patient’s overall wellbeing compared to the scores of individual symptoms.

Aims and auditable outcomes: We aim to ensure 100% patients on clozapine have annual physical health checks. By ensuring all patients prescribed clozapine therapy receive an annual physical health check and medic review, we aim to improve patient safety and prevent serious harm from occurring in cases that could be avoided.

All patients aged over 18 years prescribed Clozapine, who were under the assessment and treatment service in Eastbourne, were identified using Carenotes, our electronic patient records system.

78% of patients on clozapine had been reviewed by a doctor in the past 12 months. 32% of patients had attended a physical health review within the past 12 months. One patient had not had a medical review for several years.

Our audit has shown that there are no clear guidelines on the long term monitoring of clozapine in regards to physical health reviews and psychiatric assessment. Using best practice it appears annual review should be the minimal standard, however further evaluation of this is recommended at trust level.

In response to these results and the current guidance, we would like to implement the following:

• • Create a database for all patients on Clozapine under the care of Eastbourne ATS.

• • Create a spreadsheet looked after by one member of admin staff to be updated regularly

• • The physical health lead nurse to be informed of physical health checks due by admin

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant nosocomial pathogen in the ICU. MRSA contamination of healthcare personnel (HCP) gloves and gowns after providing care to patients with MRSA occurs at a rate of 14%–16% in the ICU setting. Little is known about whether the MRSA isolates identified on HCP gown and gloves following patient care activities are the same as MRSA isolates identified as colonizing or infecting the patient.

From a multisite cohort of 388 independent patient MRSA isolates and their corresponding HCP gown and glove isolates, we selected 91 isolates pairs using a probability to proportion size (PPS) sampling method. To determine whether the patient and HCP gown or gloves isolates were genetically similar, we used 5 comparative genomic typing methods: phylogenetic analysis, spa typing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), large-scale BLAST score ratio (LSBSR), and single-nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis.

We identified that 56 (61.5%) of isolate pairs were genetically similar at least by 4 of the methods. Comparably, the spa typing and the LSBSR analyses revealed that >75% of the examined isolate pairs were concordant, with the thresholds established for each analysis.

Many of the patient MRSA isolates were genetically similar to those on the HCP gown or gloves following a patient care activity. This finding indicates that the patient is often the primary source of the MRSA isolates transmitted to the HCP, which can potentially be spread to other patients or hospital settings through HCP vectors. These results have important implications because they provide additional evidence for hospitals considering ending the use of contact precautions (gloves and gowns) for MRSA patients.

The North Carolina Legislature appropriated funds in 2016–2019 for the Healthy Food Small Retailer Program (HFSRP), providing small retailers located in food deserts with equipment to stock nutrient-dense foods and beverages. The study aimed to: (1) examine factors facilitating and constraining implementation of, and participation in, the HFSRP from the perspective of storeowners and (2) measure and evaluate the impact and effectiveness of investment in the HFSRP.

The current analysis uses both qualitative and quantitative assessments of storeowner perceptions and store outcomes, as well as two innovative measures of policy investment effectiveness. Qualitative semi-structured interviews and descriptive quantitative approaches, including monthly financial reports and activity forms, and end-of-programme evaluations were collected from participating HFSRP storeowners.

Eight corner stores in North Carolina that participated in the two cohorts (2016–2018; 2017–2019) of the HFSRP.

Owners of corner stores participating in the HFSRP.

All storeowners reported that the HFSRP benefitted their stores. In addition, the HFSRP had a positive impact on sales across each category of healthy food products. Storeowners reported that benefits would be enhanced with adjustments to programme administration and support. Specific suggestions included additional information regarding which healthy foods and beverages to stock; inventory management; handling of perishable produce; product display; modified reporting requirements and a more efficient process of delivering and maintaining equipment.

All storeowners reported several benefits of the HFSRP and would recommend that other storeowners participate. The barriers and challenges they reported inform potential approaches to ensuring success and sustainability of the HFSRP and similar initiatives underway in other jurisdictions.

To explore perceptions of how context shapes adolescent diet and physical activity in eight low- and middle-income (LMIC) sites at different stages of societal and economic transition.

Novel qualitative secondary analysis of eight data sets generated as part of the international Transforming Adolescent Lives through Nutrition (TALENT) collaboration.

Diverse sites in India and Sub-Saharan Africa.

Fifty-two focus group discussions with 491 participants (303 adolescents aged 10–17 years; 188 caregivers).

Analysis of pooled qualitative data identified three themes: (1) transitions in generational nutrition education and knowledge; (2) transition in caregiver–adolescent power balance and (3) the implications of societal and economic transition for diet and physical activity. Adolescents in urban and peri-urban areas could readily access ‘junk’ food. Diets in rural settings were determined by tradition, seasonality and affordability. Physical activity was inhibited by site-specific factors including lack of space and crime in urban settings, and the prioritisation of academic performance. Gender influenced physical activity across all sites, with girls afforded fewer opportunities.

Interventions to improve adolescent diet and physical activity in LMIC need to be complex, context-specific and responsive to transitions at the individual, economic and societal levels. Moreover, solutions need to acknowledge gender inequalities in different contexts, as well as structural and cultural influences on diet and physical activity in resource-limited settings. Programmes need to be effective in engaging and reconciling adolescents’ and caregivers’ perspectives. Consequently, there is a need for action at both the community-household level and also through policy.