To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We examine the response of the exchange rate to monetary policy shocks using structural vector autoregression (SVAR). The SVAR approach in this study differs from previous studies by incorporating uncertainty measures and employing shock-restricted identification constraints. Using structural shocks that are in accordance with the event and external variable constraints, we demonstrate that the US exchange rate appreciates immediately in response to contractionary monetary policy shocks, with the maximum appreciation occurring within one to two months. Our finding highlights the importance of allowing contemporaneous interaction between interest rate and exchange rate, as facilitated by the shock-restricted SVAR, and accounting for uncertainties to address the puzzle of the exchange rate response.
This chapter begins by considering the problem of acquiring a certain amount of tax from the individuals in a society in conjunction with assigning a specific quantity of subsidy to the same set of individuals in an inequality-minimizing manner, where the tax and the subsidy sizes need not be the same (see Chakravarty and Sarkar, 2022). The tax-collection-subsidy provision scheme we are considering here can be viewed as follows: tax payments are made by the individuals to the government, and subsidy (benefit/transfer) payments are made from the government to the individuals. If the sizes of the total tax and total subsidy are the same, then Fei's (1981) inequality-minimizing solution for a balanced budget plan becomes a particular case of the tax-subsidy allocation program considered here. However, Fei's analysis has a limitation; it does not consider the practical problem where the before- and after-tax total incomes may differ. In general, total tax levied on a set of individuals is higher than the total transfer made to them. The administration may be required to make welfare payments on an absolute basis – for instance, when the individuals in a society get affected by some natural calamity such as cyclone and flood. It may become essential for the administration to spend money on an urgent basis for the maintenance or construction of a public good. All these expenditures are generally financed from the taxes raised from the individuals.
In the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean (SEMed) region, the transition to low-carbon power must be achieved while ensuring security of supply, affordability and development. Using the Just and Sustainable Energy Transition framework and a neo-institutional lens, we analysed 470 study–country–family observations (2000–2025) across 11 jurisdictions and 7 instrument families to create an institutional mechanism map. Three regularities stand out. Systems performance signals dominate in nine countries, primarily through time-differentiated pricing, settlement discipline and codified connection, queuing and curtailment rules. Financing and integration risks are often addressed together where auctions, revenue-support schemes, published access terms and standardised long-term contracts coexist with system rules. Equity-related signals arise where prosumer compensation and reconciliation rules influence participation and cost sharing at the retail margin. These patterns provide an interpretive basis for sequencing constraint-led reforms in SEMed power systems that target binding risks while respecting fiscal and distributional constraints.
In the theory of distribution in economics, equality assessments have generally been formulated on the basis of the distribution of some individual achievement – health, income, literacy, opportunity, and so on – across the population. Thus, equality is a multifaceted phenomenon. Equality becomes an issue of scrutiny in multiple dimensions, and it is not reducible to equality in one sphere only (Sen, 2009). Although a great many problems have been addressed and resolved, new problems are being posed and analyzed. (For a recent discussion on equality from different perspectives, see Piketty, 2022.)
The choice of a specific dimension of wellbeing is certainly a matter of value judgment. In this book we will consider income as the only dimension of human wellbeing because the main body of the book, Chapters 4–8, will study income taxation and subsidy allocation from different standpoints, covering a wide range of topics. Since people also care about other dimensions, our focused analysis does not express the view that they are less important for human welfare.
Social policy makers often become concerned with low equality because low equality means high income gaps between the rich and the poor. This may give rise to social disorder and lead to civil wars. Following the publication of Russett's (1964) seminal article, many researchers have attempted to determine the relationship between inequality and conflict. Nonetheless, it has sometimes been argued in the literature that the relationship between inequality and conflict is a debatable issue.
In the income distribution literature attempts were made to relate the concept of “bipolarization,” “shrinking middle class,” to the population share in some well-defined middle-income group of the society. Thus, in a highly polarized society individuals are disproportionately placed in the upper and lower ends of the income distribution. Such movements of the individuals toward the extremes are likely to have negative consequences on social and political relations. In Chapter 1 we have argued that a well-off and sizable middle-income group of an economy contributes to the wellbeing, peace, and democracy of the society in many ways. Therefore, a desirable objective of a policy planner is to recommend policies that can make the society less bipolarized or, equivalently, more depolarized. The subject of this chapter is to present an analytical discussion on depolarization.
The aforementioned notion of polarization contrasts with the concept of income “multipolar” polarization, suggested by Esteban and Ray (1994) (see also Duclos, Esteban, and Ray, 2004; Esteban and Ray, 2012). The three properties that are taken to be innate to this concept of polarization are (i) polarization is a matter of subgroups, (ii) with two or more subgroups, polarization increases when “within-group” dispersion reduces, and (iii) polarization increases when “between-group” distances rise. Properties (ii) and (iii) represent respectively the “identification”/attachment and “alienation”/detachment components of polarization.
This chapter considers whether, and under what conditions, private firms can productively combine existing patent assets to support the dissemination and use of green technology. It assesses the unique challenges that face the organizers of private patent commons in the green technology sector. To do so, it first reviews prior efforts to form green patent commons, as well as recent commons proposals that have not yet been implemented. Next, it asks why these efforts have not been successful in achieving their respective goals. Finally, it offers suggestions for future planners seeking to promote the global dissemination and use of patented green technologies through the formation of commons structures.
This paper presents an illustrated tutorial for conducting an embedded Mixed-Method Social Network Analysis (MMSNA) to examine the dynamic interplay between human agency and social networks. We draw on an empirical study in education that investigated how teachers enact relational agency within their school networks to support the integration of migrant students. We propose a replicable method and stepwise procedure for designing, implementing and evaluating an embedded MMSNA. While the potential of MMSNA has long been recognized across disciplines, its purpose and operationalization are often underexplained. We illustrate how MMSNA can be used to analyze both network structures and the agency of actors embedded within them, in alignment with specific research objectives and theoretical perspectives.
John Rawls proposed a theory of justice for the basic structure of society. Surprisingly, his suggestions for tax institutions were not well articulated. Rawls’s principles of justice do not prescribe a unique set of tax recommendations, but his remarks on tax matters reflect his vision of society as a cooperative venture in which everyone must work. This paper makes two contributions. First, it offers a chronological, systematic, and contextual analysis of what Rawls wrote on taxation. Rawls’s comments on taxation reveal his lifelong concern for preserving market incentives and his rejection of ability-to-pay as a principle of taxation. Second, the paper argues that some of Rawls’s tax proposals belong to nonideal theory because they depend on a conception of individuals in tension with the conception of moral persons developed in his theory.
This article explores possible connections between health crises, economic policy choices, and the rise of populist movements, drawing on evidence from the interwar period. It considers how differing policy responses to the Great Depression may have been associated with contrasting trajectories in both public health and political developments. In Germany, the adoption of austerity measures in the early 1930s appears to have coincided with worsening economic conditions, declining health indicators, and growing electoral support for far-right movements. By contrast, expansionary initiatives introduced under the New Deal in the U.S. were likely accompanied by strengthened social protections, improvements in health outcomes, and what some observers have interpreted as a mitigation of pressures toward political radicalisation. Taken together, these historical experiences offer insights into contemporary developments, where perceived inadequacies in responding to intertwined health and economic crises could potentially contribute to eroding institutional trust and increasing receptiveness to populist narratives.
This paper presents a new series of Mexico’s foreign trade for the period 1821–1870, using foreign sources to reconstruct it, given the scarcity of Mexican-origin data. It then employs the new series with a twofold purpose: to indicate the type of economy and society that they reveal, showing the kind of articles that the country acquired and sent to the exterior, on the one hand, and building some of the measures used in the international literature to assess the performance of the external sector, on the other. In the end, the paper evaluates the functioning of the Mexican economy that those series expose.
This chapter explores the role of Human Impact Units (Hu) and regenerative authentication credits in transforming environmental, social, and governance (ESG) governance into a more transparent and equitable knowledge commons. The authors argue that current ESG valuation models, particularly those rooted in carbon-centric methodologies, fail to capture the full spectrum of ESG impacts and often lead to “greenwashing.” By shifting the focus to noncarbon-based valuation mechanisms, such as the Hu and RACs frameworks, the chapter demonstrates how ESG efforts can be more accurately monetized, fostering greater trust and transparency in ESG claims. The authors build the theoretical foundation by proposing the concept of “ESG as knowledge commons” for managing environmental commons, and suggest that “truth” serves as the shared resource, documented through blockchain. Specifically, RACs utilize a blockchain-based framework to ensure data permanence and immutability while allowing for controlled transparency. This research underscores the permanence of truth, enabled by the network’s immutability. Overall, RACs offer an alternative governance model to traditional ESG approaches, leveraging the polycentric nature of blockchain networks to effectively address the uncertainty inherent in the ESG industry.
Tech innovations have the potential to disrupt traditional banking by unbundling banking, money, and payments; however, their impact on the cross-border payments system (CBPS) – which still relies on correspondent banking (CoBanking) networks – remains uncertain. This uncertainty is compounded by the literature’s tendency to distinguish between cash clearing and credit and to focus on the latter. Challenging this distinction, the article offers a historical perspective on the role of credit in CoBanking and international payments. It reveals the deep-rooted importance of credit in the CBPS and highlights correspondent banks’ role in providing it. But deep-rooted does not mean static. Indeed, changes in bank-intermediated trade finance practices during and after WWI reshaped the London-based CoBanking network. Furthermore, cash clearing and credit operations remained remarkably congruent until at least the 1980s, as reflected in banks’ internal organisation, reporting, and contemporaries’ descriptions of the payment system. The article argues that adopting a definition of payment systems that integrates both cash clearing and credit is essential to understanding the history of CoBanking and how it supports the CBPS. It suggests that relying on tech firms to provide the elastic payments infrastructure the economy requires could equate to jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Many mergers and acquisitions (M&As) fail, and an emerging body of literature highlights the role of prejudice in derailing the M&A process. While prejudice is frequently observed in M&As, strategies to mitigate these biases remain underexplored. Adopting a qualitative case study approach, this study focuses on Chinese acquisitions in the UK and examines how managers from both the acquired and acquiring organizations navigate prejudice through emotional sensemaking. The findings demonstrate that emotional sensemaking plays a critical role in shaping the post-acquisition integration (PAI) process and its outcomes. Specifically, sensemaking supported by emotional intelligence facilitates the accommodation or reduction of prejudice, while emotionally unintelligent sensemaking tends to reinforce it. By focusing on the dynamic, interactive emotional exchanges between managers at the micro level, this study offers a fresh lens on the integration process beyond traditional strategic or structural explanations. The study contributes to the literature by advancing the understanding of micro-level emotional sensemaking in the PAI, emphasizing the dynamic, interactive nature of emotional sensemaking between acquirer and acquiree managers, and its impact on the integration process and outcomes.
Given data’s characteristics as a nonrivalrous, inexhaustible resource, some interpretation is necessary to apply Ostrom’s design principles to the challenge of data governance – starting with the question of boundaries. Building upon the Governing Knowledge Commons framework, this chapter argues that boundaries around data resources can be drawn through the intentional development and application of values statements. Since the potential value of data often increases in relation to the number of its users and potential uses, values statements set normative expectations around the kinds of processes and outcomes that are considered desirable – what do we think is good, and how do we agree to do this work? These statements functionas a kind of boundary object that can give shape to a community’s identity and, in turn, aid in the development of new institutional strategies to protect that identity. After considering this function in the context of examples – ranging from abstract signifiers such as “open data” and “smart cities,” to bundled declarations such as the CARE principles, to specific examples of environmental data commons – this chapter concludes by offering practical guidance for the development of values statements through democratic writing processes and collective choice-making.