If G and H are elementarily equivalent groups (that is, no elementary statement of group theory distinguishes between G and H) then the definable subgroups of G are elementarily equivalent to the corresponding ones of H. But G′ of G, consisting of all products of commutators [a, b] = a−1b−1ab of elements a and b of G, may not be definable. Must G′ and H′ be elementarily equivalent?

The collection of all self-maps on a non-empty set X under composition is known in algebraic semigroup theory as the full transformation semigroup on X and is written x. Its importance lies in the fact that any semigroup S can be embedded in the full transformation semigroup (where S1 is the semigroup S with identity 1 adjoined, if S does not already possess one). The proof is similar to Cayley's Theorem that a group G can be embedded in SG, the group of all bijections of G to itself. In this paper X will be a finite set of order n, which we take to be and so we shall write Tn for X.

In [6] the question of the existence of perfect e-codes in the infinite family of distance-transitive graphs Ok was considered. It was pointed out that it is difficult to rule out completely any particular value of e because of the difficulty of working with the sphere packing condition. For e= 1, 2, 3 it can be seen from the results of [6] that the condition given by the generalisation of Lloyd's theorem is satisfied for infinitely many values of k. We shall show that this is not the case for e=4 and we shall prove that there are no perfect 4-codes in Ok.

Throughout kwill denote a field. If a group Γ acts on aset A we say an element is Γ-orbital if its orbit is finite and write ΔΓ(A) for the subset of such elements. Let I be anideal of a group algebra kA; we denote by I+ the normal subgrou(I+1)∩A of A. A subgroup B of an abelian torsion-free group A is said to be dense in A if A/B is a torsion-group. Let I be an ideal of a commutative ring K; then the spectrum Sp(I) of I is the set of all prime ideals P of K such that I≤P. If R is a ring, M is an R-module and x ɛ M we denote by the annihilator of x in R. We recall that a group Γ is said to have finite torsion-free rank if it has a finite series in which each factoris either infinite cyclic or locally finite; its torsion-free rank r0(Γ) is then defined to be the number of infinite cyclic factors in such a series.

Let G be a group and K be a complete ultrametric valued field. Let AP(G, K) be the algebra of the generalized almost periodic functions of G in K. We have shown in a previous paper that when AP(G, K) has an invariant mean, then any almost periodic linear representation is quasi-reducible. Here, we show that with the same hypothesis, any topologically irreducible almost periodic linear representation is finite dimensional; also, any almost periodic linear representation is the topological sum of irreducible representations. Furthermore, we obtain a Peter-Weyl theorem for the algebra AP(G, K).

We use the technical tools of Hopf algebra theory.

A tight Riesz group is a partially ordered group which satisfies a strengthened form of the Riesz interpolation property. The term “tight” was introduced by Miller in [8], and the tight interpolation property has been considered in papers by Fuchs [3], Miller [8, 9], Loy and Miller [7] and Wirth [12]. If the closure of the cone P, in the interval topology, of such a partially ordered group G contains no pseudozeros, then is itself the cone of a partial order on G. Loy and Miller found of particular interest the case in which this associated partial orderis a lattice order. This situation was then considered in reverse by A. Wirth [12] who investigated under what circumstances a lattice ordered group would permit the existence of a tight Riesz order (called a compatible tight Riesz order) for which the initial lattice order is the order defined by the closure of the cone of the tight Riesz order.Wirth gave two fundamental anduseful characterizations of those subsets of the cone of a lattice ordered group that canbe the strict cone of a compatible tight Riesz order; one is in terms of archimedean classes and the other is an elementwise characterization. Although Loy, Miller and Wirth restricted their attention to abelian groups, much of what they do carries over verbatim to nonabelian groups. In the main result of this paper (Theorem 2.6) a description of the strict cone of a compatible tight Riesz order on a lattice ordered group Gis given in terms of the prime subgroups of G.This is particularly useful when one is attempting to identify the compatible tight Riesz orders on some particular lattice ordered group or class of lattice ordered groups, since it narrows down to a convenient family of subsets the possible candidates for strict cones of compatible tight Riesz orders. These can then be tested under Wirth's criteria. This technique is illustrated in § 5, where the compatible tight Riesz orders are determined o a lattice ordered group of the type V(Γ, Gγ), where Γ is of finite width, and in § 6, where two examples are considered.

In a recent paper [4] Bennett and Kalton characterized dense, barrelled subspaces of an arbitrary FK space, E. In this note, it is shown that if E is assumed to be an AK space, then the characterization assumes a simpler and more explicit form.

Let R denote the space of real numbers and let D(R) denote the family of all functions mapping R into R that are (finitely) differentiable at each point of R. Since the composition f o g of two differentiable functions is also differentiable and since the composition operation is associative, it follows that D(R) is a semigroup with this operation. Such semigroups have been studied previously. Nadler, in [4], has shown that the semigroup of al differentiable functions mapping the closed unit interval into itself has no idempotent elements other than the identity function and the constant functions. The proof of that result carries over easily to the semigroup D(R).

Let D be a domain in Euclidean space of d dimensions and K a compact subset of D. The well known Harnack inequality assures the existence of a positive constant A depending only on D and K such that (l/A)u(x)<u(y)<Au(x) for all x and y in K and all positive harmonic functions u on D. In this we obtain a global integral version of this inequality under geometrical conditions on the domain. The result is the following: suppose D is a Lipschitz domain satisfying the uniform exterior sphere condition—stated in Section 2. If u is harmonic in D with continuous boundary data f then

where ds is the d — 1 dimensional Hausdorff measure on the boundary ժD. A large class of domains satisfy this condition. Examples are C2-domains, convex domains, etc.

The nth order polylogarithm Lin(z) is defined for |z| ≦ 1 by

([4, p. 169], cf. [2, §1. 11 (14) and § 1. 11. 1]). The definition can be extended to all values of zin the z-plane cut along the real axis from 1 to ∝ by the formula

[2, §1. 11(3)]. Then Lin(z) is regular in the cut plane, and there is a differential recurrence relation [4, p. 169]

It is convenient to extend the sequence Lin(z) backwards in the manner suggested by (2) and define

Then Li1(z)= – log(l–z), and Lin(z) is a rational function of z for n= 0, – 1, – 2,…. Formula (2) now holds for all integers n.

Let G, H, K be groups such that G is normal in K and G ⊆ H ⊆ K. Let I(H, K) be the set of inner automorphisms of K restricted to H; thus α ∊ I(H, K) if and only if, for some κ∊ K, α(h) = k-1hk for all h ∊ H. Let φ be an isomorphism of H/G onto a subgroup Hφ/G of K/G. An isomorphism Φ of H onto H(φ) is called an extension of ø if

Φ(h)G = φ(hG) for all h∊H.

Suppose that G is a p-primary abelian group. The subgroup G[p] = {x∈G:px=0} is called the socle of G and any subgroup S of G[p] is called a subsocle of G. If each subsocle of G supports a pure subgroup, then G is said to be pure-complete [1]. It is well known that, if G a direct sum of cyclic groups, then G is necessarily pure-complete. Further results about pure-complete groups are contained in [1] and [3].

1. It is a well known theorem due to Frobenius that the number of solutions of the equation

Xn = 1

in a finite group G, is a multiple of the greatest common divisor (n, g) of n and the order g of G. Frobenius himself proved later that the number of solutions of the equation

Xn = a

where a is a fixed element of G, is a multiple of (n, ga), ga being the order of the centralizer Z(a) of ain G.

The relation ℛ* is defined on a semigroup S by the rule that ℛ*b if and only if the elements a, b of S are related by the Green's relation ℛ in some oversemigroup of S. A semigroup S is an E-semigroup if its set E(S)of idempotents is a subsemilattice of S. A left adequate semigroup is an E-semigroup in which every ℛ*-class contains an idempotent. It is easy to see that, in fact, each ℛ*-class of a left adequate semigroup contains a unique idempotent [2]. We denote the idempotent in the ℛ*-class of a by a+.

Given a probability space (X, ℱ, μ) and a σ-algebra A ⊂ ℱ, arguably the most powerful tool in gaining information about an ℱ-measurable function f from restricted knowledge of -measurability is that of the conditional expectation E(f | ); written throughout the remainder of this note. Two properties of conditional expectation that may be exploited to gain information, but which also limit conditional expectation's use are the following.

On a semigroup S let the relation ℛ*, sometimes denoted by ℛ, be defined by xℛ*y[(sx = txsy = ty]. A semigroup S is called left type-A, iff the set Es of idempotents of S forms a semilattice under multiplication, each element x of Sis ℛ* related to a (necessarily unique) idempotent x+, and xe = (xe)+x for all x ∈ S, е ∈ Es.

Let X be a complex Banach space. For any bounded linear operator T on X, the (spatial) numerical range of T is denned as the set

If V(T) ⊆ R, then T is called hermitian. Vidav and Palmer (see Theorem 6 of [3, p. 78] proved that if the set {H + iK:H and K are hermitian} contains all operators, then X is a Hilbert space. It is natural to ask the following question.

The object of this paper is to evaluate a few infinite integrals involving E-functions by applying the Parseval-Goldstein [1] theorem of Operational Calculus; that, if

and

then

when the integrals are convergent.