To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The concept of a hermitian element of a Banach algebra was first introduced by Vidav [21] who proved that, if a Banach algebra 𝒜 has “enough” hermitian elements, then 𝒜 can be renormed and given an involution to make it a stellar algebra. (Following Bourbaki [5] we shall use the expression “stellar algebra” in place of the term “C*-algebra”.) This theorem was improved by Berkson [2], Glickfeld [10] and Palmer [17]. The improvements consist of removing hypotheses from Vidav's original theorem and in showing that Vidav's new norm is in fact the original norm of the algebra. Lumer [13] gave a spatial definition of a hermitian operator on a Banach space E and proved it to be equivalent to Vidav's definition when one considers the Banach algebra 𝓛(E) of continuous linear mappings of E into E.
The aim of this paper is to give certain conditions characterizing ruled affine surfaces in terms of the Blaschke structure (∇, h, S) induced on a surface (M, f) in ℝ3. The investigation of affine ruled surfaces was started by W. Blaschke in the beginning of our century (see [1]). The description of affine ruled surfaces can be also found in the book [11], [3] and [7]. Ruled extremal surfaces are described in [9]. We show in the present paper that a shape operator S is a Codazzi tensor with respect to the Levi-Civita connection ∇ of affine metric h if and only if (M, f) is an affine sphere or a ruled surface. Affine surfaces with ∇S = 0 are described in [2] (see also [4]). We also show that a surface which is not an affine sphere is ruled iff im(S - HI) =ker(S - HI) and ket(S - HI) ⊂ ker dH. Finally we prove that an affine surface with indefinite affine metric is a ruled affine sphere if and only if the difference tensor K is a Codazzi tensor with respect to ∇.
Let X be an F-space (complete metric linear space) and suppose g:[0, 1] → X is a continuous map. Suppose that g has zero derivative on [0, 1], i.e.
for 0≤t≤1 (we take the left and right derivatives at the end points). Then, if X is locally convex or even if it merely possesses a separating family of continuous linear functionals, we can conclude that g is constant by using the Mean Value Theorem. If however X* = {0} then it may happen that g is not constant; for example, let X = Lp(0, 1) (0≤p≤1) and g(t) = l[0,t] (0≤t≤1) (the characteristic function of [0, t]). This example is due to Rolewicz [6], [7; p. 116].
The development of the theory of absolute integrals derives from certain key facts. Among them are:
(I) An integral is a positive linear functional on a vector lattice, which is continuous in a certain sense.
(II) A function equal almost everywhere to a summable function is itself summable.
(III) Every measurable function is the pointwise limit of a sequence of elementary step functions.
A device that often plays an important role in measure theory, but which has not beenfully exploited in the theory of abstract integrals is that of
(IV) the smallest class containing a given class and having a certain property
(such as being a σ-ring of sets). It is our purpose in this paper to examine the theory of abstract real-valued absolute integrals axiomatically, in such a way as to isolate and clarify the roles of (I) through (IV).
is known as Airy's Integral since, when z is real, it is equal to the integral
which first arose in Airy's researches on optics. It is readily seen that w= Ai(z) satisfies the differential equation d2w/dz2 = zw, an equation which also has solutions Ai(ωz), Ai(ω2z), where ω is the complex cube root of unity, exp 2/3πi. The three solutions are connected by the relation.
An N-tuple ℐ= (T1…, TN) of commuting contractions on a Hilbert space H is said to be a joint isometry if for all x in H, or, equivalently, if Athavale in [1] characterized the joint isometries as subnormal N-tuples whose minimal normal extensions have joint spectra in the unit sphere S2N−X a geometric perspective of this is given in [4]. Subsequently, V. Müller and F.-H. Vasilescu proved that commuting N-tuples which are joint contractions, i.e. , can be represented as restrictions of certain weighted shifts direct sum a joint isometry. In this paper we adapt the canonical models of [3], and also construct a new canonical model, which completes the previous descriptions by showing joint isometries are indeed restrictions of specific multivariable weighted shifts [2].
Let Q(S) denote the maximal right quotient semigroup of the semigroup S as defined in [4]. In this paper, we initiate a study of Q(S) when S is a semilattice of groups. A structure theorem for such semigroups is given by Theorem 4.11 of [2].
In his fundamental paper, “On the structure of semigroups” [6], J. A. Green has examined certain important minimal conditions which may be satisfied bya semigroup S.We say that S satisfies the minimal condition on principal left ideals if every set of principal left ideals of S contains a minimal member with respect to inclusion:this condition is denoted by ℳ1. The corresponding conditions on principal rightideals and principal two-sided ideals are denoted by ℳr and ℳ1 respectively. The purpose of the present paper is to give some further results concerning these three conditions.Extensive use is made of the work of A. H. Clifford ([3] and [4]) onminimal ideals.
The notions of isoparametric maps and submanifolds in semi-Riemannian spaces are the generalizations of such notions in Riemannian spaces. The generalizations are different according to the purposes. We take the definitions as in the Riemannian case. Quadratic isoparametric maps and submanifolds are interesting examples which can be studied in detail. In this paper we study what we call quadratic isoparametric systems. In fact we give a classification of such systems of codimension 2. We use three different methods to show that quadratic isoparametric submanifolds of codimension 2 are homogeneous. The classification of quadratic isoparametric systems is done algebraically. By this we have changed the geometric problem of classifying quadratic submanifolds of codimension 2 into the algebraic problem of classifying quadratic isoparametric systems of codimension 2. The classification of such systems with arbitrary codimension is still open.
In [10], C. Sundberg uses a clever argument involving an idea of Davie and Jewell [13] to prove an isomorphism theorem for a very general class of operators. A related spectral inclusion theorem is an immediate consequence of the proof of this result, as Sundberg points out. He goes on to list several well known examples that are applications of his main result and remarks that the proof of the McDonald–Sundberg theorem (c.f. [9]) can now be considerably simplified. The purpose of this note is to give further evidence of the utility of the criterion established in [10]. Here and throughout X denotes a compact Hausdorff space and A is a function algebra on X. The Shilovboundary of A is the minimal closed subset ∂(A) of X with the property that
In [6] the question of the existence of perfect e-codes in the infinite family of distance-transitive graphs Ok was considered. It was pointed out that it is difficult to rule out completely any particular value of [6] because of the difficulty of working with the sphere packing condition. For e = 1, 2, 3 it can be seen from the results of [6] that the condition given by the generalisation of Lloyd's theorem is satisfied for infinitely many values of k. We shall show that this is not the case for e = 4 and we shall prove that there are no perfect 4-codes in Ok.
An algebra A = (L; ∨, ∧, *, +, 0, 1) of type (2, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0) is a doublep-algebra if (L; ∨, ∧, 0, 1) is a (0, l)-lattice in which * and + are unary operations of pseudocomplementation and dual pseudocomplementation determined by the respective requirements that x ≤ a* be equivalent to x ∧ a = 0, and that x ≥ a+ if and only if x ∨ a = 1.
In an earlier paper [5] we introduced the idea of an immersion f: Mm-ℝn with totally reducible focal set. Such an immersion has the property that, for all p ∈ M, the focal set with base p is a union of hyperplanes in the normal plane to f(M) at f(p). Trivially, this always holds if n = m + 1 so we only consider n > m + 1.
Darling [3] in 1932 and Bailey [2] in 1933 gave certain theorems on products of hypergeometric series. Again in 1948 Sears [4] used the relation which expresses the series in terms of M other series of the same type to derive transformations between products of both basic and ordinary hypergeometric series. In this paper I give certain general theorems on products of bilateral hypergeometric series together with some of their interesting special cases.
Here and throughout, A is a closed subalgebra of H∞ that contains the disk algebra and M(A) denotes the maximal ideal space of A. Because A contains the function fo(z) = z, we can define the fiber Mλ(A) of M(A) for λ ε ∂D (the unit circle) in the usual way; i.e., Mλ(A) = {φ ∈ M(A): fo(φ) = λ}. The Bergman space of the unit disk D is the L2(D, dx dy)-closure of A. Let be the orthogonal projection. For f ∈ L∞(D, dx dy), define the multiplication operator Mf: L2(D, dx dy)→ L2, (D, dx dy) by
In this paper, we continue the work initiated by Morris [5] and Saeed-ul-Islam [6,7] and determine complete sets of inequivalent irreducible projective representations (which we shall write as i.p.r.) of finite Abelian groups with respect to some additional factor sets.
We consider an Abelian group
which will be referred to as an Abelian group of type (a1, …, am).
Let U(RG) be the group of units of a group ring RG over a commutative ring R with 1. We say that a group is an SIT-group if it is an extension of a group which satisfies a semigroup identity by a torsion group. It is a consequence of the main result that if G is torsion and R = Z, then U(RG) is an SIT-group if and only if G is either abelian or a Hamiltonian 2-group. If R is a local ring of characteristic 0 only the first alternative can occur.