To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
1. Prof. E. T. Copson has discussed the well-known problem of a circular disc kept at a constant potential Vo in an external field of potential Φ by reducing it to the solution of two integral equations. Tho solution is however fairly simple if we use oblate spheroidal co-ordinates. This is due to the fact that in this system of coordinates the disc can be represented in terms of one co-ordinate only. This method is applied to the above problem and Copson's results are obtained. The solution when Vo is not constant, but any surface function of the disc, is also obtained.
The use of geodesic polar coordinates in the intrinsic geometry of a surface leads to the concept of a geodesic circle, i.e. the locus of points at a constant distance from the pole 0 along the geodesics through 0. A geodesic hypersphere is the obvious generalisation of this for a Riemannian Vn. We propose to consider more general central quadric hypersurfaces of Vn, which we define as follows. Let xi (i = 1, 2, …, n) be a system of coordinates in Vn, whose metric is gijdxidxj, and let aij be the components in the x's of a symmetric covariant tensor of the second order, evaluated at the point 0, which is taken as pole.
It has been well known for many years (2) that if Fμ(t) is the Fourier-Stieltjes transform of a bounded measure μ on the real line R, which is bounded away from zero, it does not follow that [Fμ(t)]−1 is also the Fourier-Stieltjes transform of a measure. It seems of interest (as was remarked, in conversation, by J. D. Weston) to consider measures on the half-line R+ = [0, ∞[, instead of on R.
Let E be n-dimensional (n≧2) real vector space with a nondegenerate symmetric scalar product (.|.):E × E → R1 with an arbitrary signature (p, n–p). Let us consider a second order partial differential equation (P.D.E.) of the form:
where φ is a given function of two variables, v is an unknown function (defined on an open subset 0 ⊂E), |∇ν|2: =(∇ν|∇ν) is the square of the gradient ∇ν of the function ν and ∇2, denotes the Laplace-Beltrami operator.
Let U be the open unit disk in the complex plane endowed with normalized Lebesgue measure m. will denote the usual Lebesgue space with respect to m, with 0<p<+∞. The Bergman space consisting of the analytic functions in will be denoted . Let μ be some positivefinite Borel measure on U. It has been known for some time (see [6] and [9]) what conditions on μ are equivalent to the estimate: There is a constant C such that
The object of this paper is to essay an analytical statement of the reduction of the integration of a canonic system of differential equations (into which time does not enter explicitly) to that of the partial differential equation of Jacobi and Hamilton; and to illustrate the principle of duality by an outline of the solution for the problem of two bodies both by the standard form of the equation referred to and by the analogous form which that principle involves. Most statements of the reduction are verifications and somewhat obscure the symmetry of the canonic form. The shortest procedure, of course, is by means of the well known theorem of Jacobi, and this verificatory method is followed by Tisserand, Charlier and Appell. Poincaré gives a proof depending on a simple form given by him to the conditions for a canonical change of variables, but again the statement lacks analytical form. The essentials of this proof will be given here, but in an entirely different way. An analytical treatment of the subject has been given by Professor L. Becker in his class lectures at Glasgow, but it has not been published.
The application of the hodograph method in problems in fluid dynamics dates back to the time of Helmholtz and Kirchhoff. The underlying principle is simple. It is in effect to rewrite the governing differential equations with the roles of the original dependent and independent variables reversed. Such a procedure is not uncommon in problems depending upon ordinary differential equations. For example, if the velocity of a particle in rectilinear motion is prescribed as a function of distance from a fixed point, the problem of finding the relation between its position and the time t can be solved by one quadrature if t is regarded as the dependent variable.
In the Proceedings of 1905–6 Mr Pinkerton gave an extension of the nine point circle to a nine point conic. This raises the question of the extension of the geometry of the circle and triangle to that of the conic and triangle. If a triangle with its associated system of lines and circles be orthogonally projected on a second plane we have a triangle with an associated system of lines and homothetic ellipses. Pairs of perpendicular lines are projected into lines parallel to pairs of conjugate diameters. Such lines will be called, for shortness, in the sequel, conjugate lines. In any relation between lengths of lines, these lengths will be replaced by their ratios to the lengths of the parallel radii of one of the homothetic ellipses.
The present paper contains solutions of the tensor generalisation of Laplace's Equation. The results obtained are summarised in the two theorems enunciated in § 1. They apply only to the case when the Riemannian space forming the background of the theory is flat. In the concluding paragraph a special case is considered, and it is shown that the present theory is closely connected with Whittaker's well known general solution of the ordinary Laplace's Equation.