To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
When a shock wave moving through an isentropic ideal gas catches up with, and passes into a simple expansion wave, the shock decays. Because of this the gas will not be isentropic in the region behind the shock. The problem of determining the motion of the gas in this region is as yet unsolved. In this paper we introduce a simple compression wave behind the shock which catches up with it at the instant of its entry into the leading expansion wave. This second wave is chosen so as to counteract the decaying effect of the first, and keep the shock strength constant throughout the motion. We assume the first wave to be point-centred, and caused by the withdrawal of a piston at a finite velocity from a gas at rest in a shock tube. After a finite time the piston is halted causing the shock. The problem is then to determine the subsequent motion of the piston to produce a compression wave with the desired property.
Recently, the first author and, independently, A. V. Jategaonkar have shown that every factor ring of U(g), the universal enveloping algebra of a finite dimensional complex Lie algebra, has a primary decomposition if g is solvable and almost algebraic. On the other hand, a suitable factor ring of U(SL(2, ℂ) fails to have a primary decomposition (1).
Zubov states an elegant necessary and sufficient limit set condition for positive orbital stability of compact invariant sets in his book “Metody A. M. Lyapunova i ih Primenenie” [11]. Stated in terms of our terminology of L– for the negative limit set, Zubov's proposition is as follows: A necessary and sufficient condition for positive stability of a compact invariant set M isL–(X\M)∩M=Ø. Unfortunately, Zubov's condition L–(X\M)∩M=Ø has subsequently been shown to be necessary but not sufficient (see [9]). Bass and Ura devote considerable effort in [2] and [9[ to correcting Zubov's proposition and Desbrow obtains additional results principally concerning unstable sets in [6] and [7]. Ura gives his classical corrected prolongational version of Zubov's assertion on locally compact phase spaces in [9] and extends it to any closed invariant set with compact boundary on such spaces in [10].
The present paper is based on a method attributed to Euler of expressing as a continued fraction the logarithmic derivate of a solu tion of a linear differential equation of the second order. The method is particularly applicable to equations of hypergeometric type, and, in that connection, was previously employed by the present author as a means of adding to the number of known transformations of continued fractions.
Let B(H) be the algebra of bounded linear operators on a complex separable Hilbert space H. The problem of operator approximation is to determine how closely each operator T ∈B(H) can be approximated in the norm by operators in a subset L of B(H). This problem is initiated by P. R. Halmo [3] when heconsidered approximating operators by the positive ones. Since then, this problem has been attacked with various classes L: the class of normal operators whose spectrum is included in a fixed nonempty closed subset of the complex plane [4], the classes of unitary operators [6] and invertible operators [1]. The purpose of this paper is to study the approximation by partial isometries.
(1) If O be a given point in the plane of a given conic, the mutual relationship between point and conic is marked, first and foremost, by the existence of a certain determinate straight line (which is always real) known as the polar of O with respect to the conic. Next following the polar in natural order of sequence, come a certain pair of determinate straight lines:
The single real pair of common chords of the conic and a point circle at O.
The question of whether ribbon-disc complements—or, equivalently, standard 2-complexes over labelled oriented trees—are aspherical is of great importance for Whitehead’s asphericity conjecture and, if solved affirmatively, would imply a combinatorial proof of the asphericity of knot complements. We present here two classes of diagrammatically reducible labelled oriented trees.
The classical theorem of Müntz and Szász says that the span of
is dense in C[0,1] in the uniform norm if and only if . We prove that, if {λi} is lacunary, we can replace the underlying interval [0,1] by any set of positive measure. The key to the proof is the establishment of a bounded Remez-type inequality for lacunary Müntz systems. Namely if A ⊆ [0,1] and its Lebesgue measure µ(A) is at least ε > 0 then
where c depends only on ε and Λ (not on n and A) and where Λ:=infiλi+1/λi>1.
Recently J. M. Osborn has investigated the structure of a simple commutative non-associative algebra with unity element satisfying a polynomial identity, (4), (5) and (6). From his work it seems likely that if such an algebra is of degree three or more it is necessarily power-associative. In (4) he establishes a hierarchy of identities with the property that each identity is satisfied by an algebra satisfying no preceding identity. Following (5), (6),the next identity to consider is
where a, c and h are elements of the ground field.
1. The term Second Moment, which is already in frequent use, as applied to lines, areas and volumes, as well as masses, is preferable to the older term Moment of Inertia which properly applies only to masses.