Longevity risk significantly impacts the reserve adequacy ratio of annuity issuers, thereby reducing product profitability. Effectively managing this risk has thus become a priority for insurance companies. A natural hedging strategy, which involves balancing longevity risk through an optimised portfolio of life insurance and annuity products, offers a promising solution and has attracted considerable academic attention in recent years. In this study, we construct a realistic portfolio scenario comprising annuities and life insurance policies across various ages and genders. By applying Cholesky decomposition, we transform the portfolio into an uncorrelated linear model. Our objective function minimises the variance in portfolio value changes, allowing us to explore the impact of mortality on longevity risk mitigation through natural hedging. Using actuarial mathematics and the Bayesian MCMC algorithm, we analyse the factors influencing the hedging effectiveness of a portfolio with minimised variance. Empirical findings indicate that the optimal life-to-annuity ratio is influenced by multiple factors, including gender, age, projection period, and forecast horizon. Based on these findings, we recommend that insurance companies adjust their business structures and actively pursue product innovation to enhance longevity risk management.

This paper presents an actuarially oriented approach for estimating health state utility values using an enhanced EQ-5D-5L framework that incorporates demographic heterogeneity directly into a Generalised Linear Model (GLM). Using data from 148 patients with Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in South Africa, an inverse Gaussian GLM was fitted with demographic variables and EQ-5D-5L domain responses to explain variation in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Model selection relied on Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, and residual deviance, and extensive diagnostic checks confirmed good calibration, no overdispersion, and strong robustness under bootstrap validation. The final model identified age, gender, home language, and financial dependency as significant predictors of perceived health, demonstrating that utility values differ meaningfully across demographic groups. By generating subgroup-specific estimates rather than relying on uniform value sets, the framework supports more context-sensitive cost-effectiveness modelling and fairer resource allocation. Although developed in the South African NSCLC setting, the methodology is generalisable and offers actuaries and health economists a replicable tool for integrating population heterogeneity into Health Technology Assessment, pricing analysis, and value-based care.

An increasing number of reports highlight the potential of machine learning (ML) methodologies over the conventional generalised linear model (GLM) for non-life insurance pricing. In parallel, national and international regulatory institutions are accentuating their focus on pricing fairness to quantify and mitigate algorithmic differences and discrimination. However, comprehensive studies that assess both pricing accuracy and fairness remain scarce. We propose a benchmark of the GLM against mainstream regularised linear models and tree-based ensemble models under two popular distribution modelling strategies (Poisson-gamma and Tweedie), with respect to key criteria including estimation bias, deviance, risk differentiation, competitiveness, loss ratios, discrimination and fairness. Pricing performance and fairness were assessed simultaneously on the same samples of premium estimates for GLM and ML models. The models were compared on two open-access motor insurance datasets, each with a different type of cover (fully comprehensive and third-party liability). While no single ML model outperformed across both pricing and discrimination metrics, the GLM significantly underperformed for most. The results indicate that ML may be considered a realistic and reasonable alternative to current practices. We advocate that benchmarking exercises for risk prediction models should be carried out to assess both pricing accuracy and fairness for any given portfolio.

The goal of the Paris Agreement is to prevent global temperatures from rising by more than 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursue efforts to limit them to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. This requires a significant reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions and achieving net zero emissions by 2050. Portfolio alignment metrics are forward-looking metrics intended to help investors understand whether their investment portfolios are on track to meet the Paris Agreement goals. They also aim to encourage capital flows towards activities needed for a net zero transition. Since 2020, several metrics have been put forward by industry groups and explored in technical papers. Companies and actuaries have been exploring the practicalities of these metrics and starting to incorporate them into investment reporting and design. But this has not been without key challenges. The Net Zero and Implications for Investment Portfolios working party aims to help actuaries improve their understanding of what net zero means for an investment portfolio and what the key mechanisms are to achieve this, as well as key challenges to date and the outlook for development.

Federated Learning is a novel method of training machine learning models, pioneered by Google, aimed for use on smartphones. In contrast to traditional machine learning, where data is centralised and brought to the model, Federated Learning involves the algorithm being brought to the data, ensuring privacy is preserved. This paper will demonstrate how insurance companies in a market could use this technique to build a claims frequency neural network prediction model collectively by combining and using all of their customer data, without actually sharing or compromising any sensitive information with each other. A simulated car insurance market with 10 players was created using the freMTPL2freq dataset. It was found that if all insurers were permitted to share their confidential data with each other, they could collectively build a model that achieved 5.57% of exposure weighted Poisson Deviance Explained (% PDE) on an unseen sample. However, if they are not permitted to share their customer data, none of them can achieve more than 3.82% exposure weighted PDE on the same unseen sample. With Federated Learning, they can retain all of their customer data privately and construct a model that achieves a similar level of accuracy to that achieved by centralising all the data for model training, reaching 5.34% exposure weighted PDE on the same unseen sample.