To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter presents agreements between Indigenous peoples and governments, specifically those in Bangladesh and Mexico that focus on their roles in promoting sustainable development. The introduction sets the stage for subsequent discussions by emphasizing the importance of global legal and policy frameworks in shaping these agreements, with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and the global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The two case studies from Bangladesh and Mexico are then analysed, shedding light on the unique characteristics, provisions, and outcomes of agreements between Indigenous peoples and governments in these contexts. A comparative analysis is conducted to identify commonalities, differences, and lessons learned from these case studies. Ultimately, the chapter concludes by highlighting the significance of ongoing dialogue, collaboration, and respect for Indigenous rights in achieving sustainable development goals globally. It underscores the importance of incorporating Indigenous perspectives and aspirations into the design and implementation of such agreements.
The aim of this review is to examine why cultural food security and cultural food sovereignty should be prioritised and embedded within conventional food security frameworks. It demonstrates how culturally grounded, community-driven approaches foster more just, sustainable, and empowering food systems for ethnically diverse, Indigenous, and local communities, while highlighting the limitations of conventional metrics that overlook socio-cultural, political, and ecological dimensions essential to resilience. Conventional food security focuses on access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food, often sidelining access to culturally appropriate and spiritually meaningful foods that are integral to cultural identity and tradition (cultural food security) and the authority and decision-making power held by local people over their foodways (cultural food sovereignty). Its market-based, individualistic measurement paradigms further neglect collectivist, traditional, and spiritual food values, resulting in assessments that may conform to global standards yet produce flawed outcomes, misaligned interventions, and continued marginalisation of ethnically diverse, Indigenous and local communities. Drawing on socio-cultural, political, economic, and environmental frameworks, the review demonstrates how food sovereignty and cultural food security provide more sustainable, equitable, and empowering pathways for communities. It underscores the need for community-driven, culturally grounded food policies.
To estimate the prevalence of nutrition security and examine its association with community food environment factors, including food access and affordability.
Design:
This cross-sectional study used data from the 2012-2013 National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey, including its restricted-use Geography Component (FoodAPS-GC). Household nutrition security measure was derived by combining self-assessed food security and self-rated diet quality indicators into four categories: food secure with high diet quality (FSHD), food secure with low diet quality (FSLD), food insecure with high diet quality (FIHD), and food insecure with low diet quality (FILD). Only FSHD households were considered nutrition secure. Multinomial logit analysis identified factors associated with nutrition security.
Participants:
4,685 households with primary respondents aged 20 years or older
Setting:
Nationally representative sample of US households
Results:
Approximately 31.0% of households were classified as nutrition insecure, including 15.0% as FSLD, 9.3% as FIHD, and 6.7% as FILD. The remaining 69.0% were nutrition secure (FSHD). Nutrition insecurity was significantly associated with younger age, lower educational attainment, lower income, obesity, smoking, and poorer self-rated health. Food environment factors, including low geographic access to food and higher local food prices, were not significantly associated with nutrition security. Relying on someone else’s car to reach a primary food store was linked to higher odds of nutrition insecurity.
Conclusions:
The proposed nutrition security measure can be used to monitor nutrition security in national surveys. Comprehensive measures of the food environment are needed to understand its relationship with nutrition security and to guide targeted policy interventions.
Household food insecurity has previously been associated with psychological distress, and subsequently, poorer diet quality. Further understanding of this relationship is required to improve nutritional outcomes, with food-related concerns suggested as one potential mechanism. Therefore, the current pre-registered (https://osf.io/zd3ak) study conducted cross-sectional secondary analyses of Wave 6 (October 2022–January 2023) of the Food and You 2 survey administered in adults aged 16 years and over across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (N = 2315), to explore the differential prevalence of food-related concerns in people experiencing food insecurity. Exploratory analyses also identified characteristics of food support users (food bank or social supermarket; N = 467) and quantified associations between food support use and the same food-related concerns. People experiencing marginal (OR = 1.43, p = 0.02) and low food security (OR = 1.51, p = 0.02) (relative to high food security) were significantly more concerned about food prices, but this association was not seen in people experiencing very low food security. Both food bank and social supermarket use were predicted by very low food security (food bank OR = 6.05, p < 0.001; social supermarket OR = 2.40, p = 0.02) and having a long-term health condition (food bank OR = 3.91, p = 0.00; social supermarket OR = 3.17, p = 0.00). Food bank users were less concerned about healthy eating (OR = 0.33, p = 0.00) whereas social supermarket users were less concerned about food prices (relative to non-users) (OR = 0.40, p = 0.01). Food-related concerns, particularly regarding food prices, are differentially associated with food security status and food support use. Findings could support specific interventions to promote better diet quality and improve health and wellbeing in populations experiencing food insecurity.
Integrated Soil Fertility Management (ISFM) refers to a holistic approach to managing soil fertility that combines a variety of techniques and practices to improve soil health and enhance agricultural productivity, particularly in smallholder farming systems. Despite the associated higher labor and other input demands associated with ISFM adoption, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the positive outcomes of these investments at the household level. Using data from 380 tomato farmers in three regions of Ghana, we explore the relationship between ISFM adoption and household welfare. The methodology employed relies on inverse probability weighting regression adjustment (IPWRA). The findings reveal that ISFM adoption positively impacts household welfare by increasing net income by GH₵436.88 ($60.43)/ha, improving household assets by GH₵518.17 ($71.67)/ha, enhancing food security by 1.23 points, and reducing household expenditure by GH₵57.39 ($7.94)/ha. The results highlight ISFM’s potential to enhance smallholder welfare through increased income, improved household assets, and better food security, contributing to poverty reduction and sustainable agricultural development. Policies should focus on improving access to fertilizers, seeds, and pesticides, coupled with extension services and farmer education programs to promote ISFM adoption. Tailored interventions targeting older and more experienced farmers, as well as household heads, are essential to overcome barriers to adoption and maximize the economic and welfare benefits of ISFM practices.
The rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system (RWCS), recognized as the world’s prime agricultural system, plays a pivotal role in global food security by providing employment for millions and ensuring a steady income, thereby serving as a cornerstone for farmers’ livelihoods and attracting numerous investors. However, the sustainability and efficiency of this critical system face momentous threats due to climate change, which affects both the quantity and quality of wheat and rice crops. Currently, the growth frequency of the RWCS has declined, principally due to evolving challenges such as weed infestation, delayed wheat sowing after rice harvest, soil salinity, and the prevalence of various diseases. Among these challenges, weeds pose a considerable threat to the cultivation of both rice and wheat. Seed germination, a crucial stage in the plant life cycle, is influenced by various factors, including dormancy, temperature, moisture, oxygen, and light. A comprehensive understanding of weed ecology is essential for identifying vulnerabilities that can be targeted for improved weed management. Population-based threshold models, including hydro-time and thermal time, provide insights into germination patterns, contributing to the overall fitness of weed species. The ability to predict species’ responses to climate change is paramount, and these models are effective in comprehending and controlling weed emergence behavior across diverse environments. Hence, this review paper emphasizes the reevaluation of current weed management practices, focusing on investigating ecologically sustainable approaches for efficient weed control.
This study tested the effects of soil amendment with orange peel powder (Citrus sinensis L.) on Brassica rapa growth, the performance of the aphid Myzus persicae Sulzer, and the foraging behaviour of its parasitoid Aphidius gifuensis Ashmead. Three peel: soil ratios (1:10, 1:15, 1:20 w/w) were compared with an unamended control. The 1:10 amendment significantly reduced seed germination, plant height, leaf size, and fresh weight, while the 1:20 amendment also decreased fresh weight. Aphid nymphal development was significantly delayed in the 1:10 and 1:15 treatments, and adult weight gain was reduced in the 1:15 treatment. Aphid population growth and parasitoid foraging time were unaffected across treatments. The results indicate that orange peel amendments can delay aphid development but also suppress plant growth at higher concentrations, highlighting the need for optimized application rates. This study supports further exploration of orange peel as a sustainable soil amendment in integrated pest management.
Food banks are a particular type of voluntary sector organization that bridges the government sector, private sector, and civil society. This special issue of Voluntas adds to the stream of research on the role of food banks in addressing food insecurity in high-income countries. We begin by outlining the concept of food insecurity and a number of direct responses to alleviating food insecurity at the household and individual level by governments and the voluntary sector. We then look at the potential and limitations of food banks in addressing food insecurity in high-income countries, distinguishing between anti-hunger research and research framed as addressing community food security. Based on the set of seven papers included in this special issue, we call for further research that bridges both these approaches.
In the last century, economic sanctions have been used with increasing frequency as a tool of global governance, as well as in foreign policy. At the same time, they have long been criticized for their lack of success in achieving the stated goals of the sanctioners. However, what has received far less attention is the question of whether, and when, it is legitimate to impose sanctions. It has become increasingly clear that the humanitarian impact of sanctions may be devastating, affecting healthcare and food security, as well as harming vulnerable populations such as migrants. Sanctions may interfere with the work of humanitarian aid organizations, create diplomatic problems, and undermine the autonomy of sovereign states. Further, there can be significant legal questions regarding the use of sanctions, whether they are imposed by states or by institutions of global governance.
United States sanctions undermine Iran’s ability to import critical agricultural products, especially wheat. Despite long-standing exemptions for humanitarian trade, sanctions have fragmented Iran’s wheat-supply chain, deterring major commodities traders, interrupting payment channels, and delaying shipments. While Iran does continue to import wheat to meet its food security needs, commodities traders can extract a higher price from Iranian importers, citing the unique challenges of exporting to the country. In this way, sanctions contribute to structurally higher prices for wheat in Iran. The country’s growing dependence on wheat imports, driven by demographic changes and worsening climate conditions, has made these disruptions more acute. Efforts to mitigate these effects, such as humanitarian trade arrangements launched by multiple US administrations, have largely failed due to bureaucratic inefficiencies and financial sector overcompliance. As a result, Iranian households have had to contend with significant food inflation, even for staples such as bread. Considering that the negative humanitarian effects of sanctions are both persistent and systemic and have been long known to US officials, it is difficult to conclude that the effects are truly unintended.
In 2018, domestic food production plummeted in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea, DPRK) and has not recovered. United Nations agencies reported that the economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) were consequential in the decrease in food production. What has been little reported, however, is the scale of damage to the DPRK food economy from sanctions. The vast majority of the population of 26 million rely on domestic food production to survive. Imports of vehicles, including tractors, spare parts, irrigation equipment, and all technology essential for producing food are banned by the expanded UN sanctions of 2016 and 2017. Oil imports, necessary for crucial aspects of food production (the DPRK is not an oil-producer), from transport to fertilizer production, are capped at an annual amount lower than the amount that South Korea consumes in one day. Without these essential inputs, domestic food production cannot recover. This was not a new scenario for North Koreans. The abrupt end of subsidized trade from Russia, Eastern Europe, and China at the end of the Cold War provided the proximate cause of the famine of the 1990s that had killed up to half a million people. The UN sanctions of 2016 and 2017 reproduced the conditions that generated famine in the 1990s.
In an era of interconnected crises – from climate change to biodiversity loss – transformative solutions require collaboration at scale. This chapter explores how public-private-philanthropic partnerships (4Ps) can unlock new funding models, amplify impact, and drive systemic change. It introduces pooled funds as a game-changing approach, demonstrating how aggregating resources across sectors can mobilize capital for high-impact initiatives.
Through compelling case studies, the chapter illustrates how aligned interests between businesses, governments, and philanthropy can catalyze sustainable development – from empowering smallholder farmers to financing global land restoration efforts. It also confronts the challenges hindering 4Ps from reaching their full potential and offers actionable strategies for overcoming them.
Urban agriculture on extensive green roofs (EGRs), which are lightweight, shallow-profile systems with low maintenance, presents a viable opportunity to enhance food production and ecosystem services in cities. However, the harsh environmental conditions typical of EGRs pose challenges for crop cultivation, especially regarding water availability. This study investigates whether facilitative interactions with a common green roof cover species, Sedum, with bush beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) as our model crop, can improve crop performance under water stress. We tested 48 EGR modules with three planting designs (no Sedum, artificial Sedum, and live Sedum) under two watering regimes (high and low) at a green roof testing facility in Toronto, Canada, and measured above- and belowground functional traits of beans to assess productivity and trait plasticity. Results revealed that water availability had a greater influence on bean performance than planting design, where beans grown with artificial Sedum under high watering showed the highest shoot biomass and yield, while performance declined significantly under low water conditions, particularly with live Sedum. Leaf physiological traits were largely unaffected by treatment, likely due to the variable rooftop conditions, and root traits were significantly influenced by both water availability and planting design. Hypervolume analyses showed that beans exhibited greater root trait plasticity than Sedum, suggesting a stronger capacity to adapt to water stress. Contrary to the hypotheses, live Sedum did not consistently facilitate bean performance, and potential competitive interactions may have outweighed any stress-ameliorating effects. These findings show water management as the main management variable for crops on EGRs. To transition EGRs into viable agricultural spaces, future strategies should explore alternative facilitative species, nutrient amendments, and microbial inoculations to support crop resilience.
Longer life expectancy and growing income inequality have prompted an increasing interest in understanding the impact of ageing on nutritional requirements in order to optimise intakes, increase the number of years lived in good health and reduce morbidity and associated health and social care costs. Food insecurity reduces access to nutritious and healthy food. Understanding the evidence base on the impacts of food insecurity and the maintenance of food security for older people is crucial to informing policy and intervention. The increase in numbers of older people experiencing food insecurity is a public health emergency and is associated with under and malnutrition. Food insecurity can be experienced at any stage of the life course but has been more widely studied with families and children where poverty is a major driver. Food insecurity in later life has been less well explored by academics, but differs from that experienced in earlier years due to additional complexities, as physical and cognitive health amplify the impact of poverty. Additionally, factors which can appear to be relatively small in impact can act in a cumulative way to push people towards food insecurity. This review will draw on research about older people’s food practices, contexts and experiences in relation to food insecurity in later life and offers a model of food insecurity that has the potential to guide focused public health efforts in order to support the older population to be food secure.
Household food security plays a critical role in determining the nutritional status of children, which in turn impacts their growth and development. This study assessed factors influencing household food security and childhood nutritional status and explored the relationship between these variables in Namutumba District. A total of 299 child-caregiver pairs participated in the study. Data were collected through structured interviews and analyzed, with multi-level mixed effects generalized linear models to examine factors associated with severe household food insecurity and children’s nutritional status. Multilinear regressions were used to evaluate the relationship between severe household food insecurity and child nutritional status. The results revealed that most households (60.2%) were severely food insecure. A double burden of malnutrition was observed, with 28.0% of children stunted and 2.8% overweight or obese. Factors positively associated with improved household food security included secondary-level education (p = 0.011), medium to high wealth percentile (p < 0.001), and the presence of at least one income-earning household member (p = 0.045). Conversely, lack of access to agricultural land, food stocks, and access to treated drinking water were significantly linked to severe food insecurity (p < 0.001). Severe food insecurity was positively associated with wasting (β = 0.81, p = 0.007) and negatively associated with stunting (β = −0.37, p = 0.039). In conclusion, multiple factors influence household food security, and the nutritional status of children aged 24–59 months. A comprehensive, food systems-based approach may be key to addressing malnutrition in Namutumba District.
This study examines the critical situation faced by Sudan’s Agricultural Plant Genetic Resources Conservation and Research Centre (APGRC) during an ongoing civil war. The center houses over 17,000 accessions of diverse crop species, including globally significant collections of sorghum and pearl millet, which represent an irreplaceable repository of agricultural biodiversity. Recent militant attacks have severely damaged the center’s infrastructure and collections, threatening decades of conservation. Through an analysis of recent reports and institutional documentation, we document the APGRC’s history and achievements, assess current conflict impacts, and propose a framework for recovery and long-term resilience. The international response, including emergency seed rescue operations and safety duplication at the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, demonstrates the vital importance of global cooperation in preserving plant genetic resources during armed conflicts. This case highlights the vulnerability of ex-situ conservation facilities in politically unstable regions and the need for decentralized conservation networks, robust safety duplication systems, and sustained international support.
We presented a phased recovery plan that addresses immediate needs, medium-term stabilization, and long-term resilience building. The global community has a shared interest in preserving the unique crop diversity of Sudan, particularly its drought-tolerant sorghum and millet varieties, which may be the key to agricultural adaptation to climate change. The response to the APGRC crisis demonstrates the recognition of this shared interest; however, sustained commitment is needed to ensure the long-term conservation of Sudan’s irreplaceable plant genetic heritage
Continued global environmental degradation generates risks to human health, for example, through air pollution, disease, and food insecurity. This study focuses on these three types of health impact and explores what drives these risks. The risks can arise from diverse causes including political, economic, social, technological, legal/regulatory, and environmental factors. We assembled diverse experts to work together to produce ‘system maps’ for how risks arise, identifying monitoring ‘watchpoints’ to help track risks and interventions that can help prevent them materialising. We critically appraise this pilot methodology, in order to improve our capacity to understand and act to protect human health.
Technical summary
Systemic risks arise through a process of contagion across political, economic, social, technological, legal/regulatory, and environmental systems. The highly complex nature of these risks prevents probabilistic assessment as is carried out for more conventional risks. This study critically explores a new approach based on participatory systems mapping with experts from diverse backgrounds helping to appraise these risks and identify data and monitoring ‘watchpoints’ to track their progress. We focus on three case studies: air quality, biosecurity, and food security. We assembled 36 experts selected in a stratified way to maximise cognitive diversity, plus 14 members of the interdisciplinary project team. Across 7 workshops, we identified 39 ‘risk cascades’, defined as pathways by which systemic risk can have negative impacts on human health, and we identified 681 watchpoints and interventions. We identify a broad range of interventions to reduce risk, exploring systems approaches to help prioritise these interventions; for example, understanding co-benefits in terms of reducing multiple different types of risk, as well as trade-offs. In this paper, we take a reflective approach, critically discussing constraints and refinements to our pilot methodology, in order to enhance capacity to appraise and act on systemic risks.
Social media summary
How can we act on the risks from air pollution, disease, and food insecurity? Insights from a new systemic risk assessment methodology.
Food insecurity is a global issue. The objective is to summarise the literature identifying the main outcomes related to out-of-school hours interventions that provide food for low-income families with school-aged children, how they impact school-aged children and their families, and to identify gaps in knowledge. This review covered the main types and dimensions proposed in the literature. One author independently selected the studies, and an independent reviewer randomly reviewed them. Any paper meeting the inclusion criteria was considered regardless of geographical location. Papers were predominantly from the US, UK and Australia, including school-aged children from low-income families. Ninety-four articles were included relating to holiday clubs (n = 38), breakfast clubs (n = 45) and after-school clubs (n = 11). Key outcomes were healthy eating, academic, social, physical activity, nutritional education and financial outcomes. Clubs were consistent regarding the positive social and financial outcomes. There was variation in the primary aim, either to improve healthy eating or to feed children, regardless of nutritional quality. None of the studies reported children’s health outcomes. This review identified the key outcomes of interventions for low-income families outside of school hours in the literature. It highlights the consistent positive social outcomes across the three intervention types and the discrepancy in the nutritional value of the food provided. Few studies examined the attainment impact of holiday clubs, with no evidence on how they could impact term-time attendance. This highlights the need to analyse secondary data to understand further the attainment and attendance impact on children attending these interventions over time.
This cross-sectional study examined the association between diet price and diet quality in a national sample of Australian adults (n 1956). Diet recall data from the 2020 International Food Policy Study were linked to a national food and beverage price dataset. Daily diet price was calculated by summing the median non-promotional prices of all foods and beverages recorded in diet recall data, priced per gram (or millilitre) and adjusted for edible portions. Diet quality was determined using the Australian Dietary Guideline Index 2013 (scored out of 115). Linear regression models tested the association between the diet price (per dollar and per ten-dollar increments) and diet quality, adjusted for education, age and sex. A positive association was observed, where diet quality increased by 0·09 units (95 % CI 0·05, 0·14) for every $AU 1 increase in diet price. Daily diet price explained approximately 8 % of the variation in diet quality across the sample (R2 = 0·08). When categorised in ten-dollar increments, participants with diet prices < $AU 10/d had a lower mean diet quality score (51·96) compared with all other diet price categories, 5–6 points lower than those whose diet was > $30/d. Diet price appeared to be a modest yet significant determinant of diet quality for Australian adults in 2020. Additional analyses are needed to investigate these associations during recent food inflation. As diet quality appears to be lowest for people who spend the least on food, government action to increase priority communities’ food budgets may help improve the nutritional quality of population diets.
To examine how home food inventories and food procurement practices changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design:
Cross-sectional baseline data from a randomised controlled trial of a home food environment intervention. Telephone interviews were conducted from October 2020 to December 2022.
Setting:
Four 2–1–1 United Way agencies in Georgia, USA.
Participants:
2–1–1 clients (n 602); 80·6 % identified as Black and 90·9 % as women. Mean age was 42·8 (sd = 11·80). The majority were food insecure (73·4 %) and received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits (65·8 %).
Results:
A majority of participants reported smaller inventories of fresh fruits and vegetables (65·1 %) and unhealthy snacks (61·6 %) in the home relative to before COVID-19. The majority (55·8 %) also reported decreased shopping for fruits and vegetables and decreased use of fast food for family meals (56·1 %). Over half (56·2 %) started to use a food pantry, and 44·9 % started ordering groceries online due to COVID-19. A COVID-19 stressors scale was significantly associated with decreased odds of a smaller fresh fruit and vegetable inventory (OR = 0·61, CI 0·51, 0·73) and a smaller unhealthy snack inventory (OR = 0·86, CI 0·74, 0·99). COVID-19 stressors were also associated with changed food procurement practices, including increased online grocery shopping (OR = 1·19, CI 1·03, 1·37), and starting to use a food pantry (OR = 1·31, CI 1·13, 1·51).
Conclusions:
The pandemic had a significant impact on home food inventories and procurement practices. Understanding how major events such as pandemics affect home food environments may help to stave off negative nutritional outcomes from similar events in the future.