Anningite-(Ce) ideally (Ca0.5Ce4+0.5)(VO4), was found within a phosphate coprolite from the sand-dominated sediments of the Gara Samani Formation, Algeria. As a tetragonal anhydrous vanadate, this mineral is classified in the xenotime group. It occurs in rock cavities and forms small (typically up to 100 μm in length) sheaf-like aggregates composed of crystals 30–40 μm in length and ∼7 μm in diameter. Anningite-(Ce) crystals are green with a vitreous lustre. No cleavage is observed and the fracture is uneven or conchoidal. Its empirical formula, calculated on the basis of 4 oxygen atoms, can be written as (Ca0.52Ce4+0.47Y3+0.01)Σ1.00[(VO4)0.88(PO4)0.05(SO4)0.06(SiO4)0.01]Σ1.00. The calculated density is 3.887 g/cm3. Anningite-(Ce) is tetragonal with space group I41/amd and unit-cell parameters a = 7.1500(4) Å, c = 6.3343(7) Å, and V = 323.82(5) Å3. Anningite-(Ce) is isostructural with wakefieldite-(Ce).

Elaborately zoned blue–grey tourmaline from the Dorothy China Clay Pit, St. Austell, Cornwall, UK reveals a history of hydrothermal activity in an open system. At least five distinct generations of tourmaline are identified within a single crystal. They are characterised by complex replacement textures displaying dissolution and reprecipitation features and compositional variations identified using optical microscopy, BSE-imaging and EPMA. The Li-rich, alkali-poor rossmanite core of the grain is considered as generation 1 tourmaline. Generation 2 tourmaline comprises a more Na-rich species, especially elbaite. Generation 3, partially replacing the core, is richer in Fe, and is mostly schorl and foitite. Generation 4, primarily Fe-rich dravite, forms an Mg-enriched rim around generations 1–3. Generation 5 fluor-schorl replaces all previous tourmaline generations and parts of the quartz matrix. Each generation corresponds to a chemically distinct fluid event suggested by dissolution textures and compositionally differing overgrowths. Infiltration of B-bearing, neutral-to-acidic fluids facilitated the growth of tourmaline. These fluids contained varying amounts of major elements reflected in the changing tourmaline composition. Dissolution probably occurred because of an increase in fluid pH or a change in major cation abundances. Generation 1 tourmaline crystallised in equilibrium with a Li-rich, Na-poor granitic host rock. From generations 1 to 3, fluids generally increased in Na and Fe while decreasing in Al and Li. Fluids increased in F at generation 3, followed by the influx of more oxidising, Mg-enriched fluids at generation 4. The final generation 5 represents a return to compositions richer in Fe and F. The episodic changes in fluid composition preserved by each generation of tourmaline records fluid infiltration. These differing compositions might reflect, in part, progression of kaolinisation of the host granites or changes in the magmatic–hydrothermal fluids. The St. Austell kaolinite deposits formed from hydrothermal alteration of the preexisting granite through multiple stages of reactive fluid infiltration as recorded in tourmaline.

Pseudosection modelling of a relict garnet-core in Palaeoproterozoic rocks from the Gridino area in the southern Belomorian belt of Karelia reveals peak-pressure eclogite-facies conditions of 610–650°C, 18–20 kbar for two retro-eclogite samples and 610–665°C, 23–26 kbar for a rare Mg-rich biotite-orthopyroxene eclogite, suggesting low initial metamorphic field gradients of 6.6–10°C/km. This confirms an earlier finding in Karelia and, considering other Palaeoproterozoic eclogite occurrences worldwide, that ‘cold’ subduction conditions, characteristic of modern-style subduction, occurred during the Palaeoproterozoic, ∼2 Ga ago, for the first time in Earth history. However, compositions of most other phases in the retro-eclogite were reset by diffusion, deformation and recrystallisation during subsequent pressure release and heating to variable degrees, a reason for earlier overestimations of temperatures. By contrast, peak-pressure conditions for a biotite paragneiss (640–740°C, 15–18 kbar) that occurs close to the biotite-orthopyroxene eclogite locality already show an early resetting of its initial assemblage. High-pressure granulite-facies peak-temperature conditions of the retro-eclogite at 712± 5°C, 9–12 kbar (along a field gradient of 20°C/km) were determined by Zr-in-rutile thermometry and quartz-in-garnet elastic barometry. These conditions were dated by a Rb/Sr mineral isochron for the biotite-orthopyroxene eclogite at 1830±20 Ma for the first time. Using existing ages for the peak-pressure conditions, possible slow overall exhumation rates of <0.9 mm/y between eclogite and the granulite-facies stages could be determined that are compatible with erosion as the main exhumation mechanism. The peak-temperature conditions were possibly established by thermal relaxation during early exhumation. However, a younger Rb/Sr mineral isochron for the biotite paragneiss indicates a characteristic Sr-isotopic disequilibrium distribution caused by diffusion during slow cooling between ∼1800 and 1750 Ma during later exhumation.

I consider the conditions for defining a mineral by its dominant end-member formula. One can calculate the end-member proportions of the end-members of a mineral provided that the end-members are linearly independent (i.e. they are phase components of the mineral); the result includes the dominant end-member of the mineral. If the end-members used in this calculation are not linearly independent, the corresponding set of simultaneous equations is indeterminate. One may remove an end-member from the system, removing the linear dependence; however, any end-member formula may be removed, leaving various sets of end-members that function as phase components. Each set of end-members produces a different solution for the end-member proportions. Each set of positive end-member proportions may (or may not) result in a different dominant end-member; however, within the compositional limits of the species, the same end-member is dominant over all others calculated with different combinations of component end-members. Problems previously encountered in attempting to calculate the dominant end-member formula were due to (1) using mineral formulae that do not accord with the requirements of stoichiometry, and (2) using end-members that are not components of the system. Where the set of end-members chosen to relate mineral composition to end-member proportions contains an end-member that is a linear combination of the other end-members, one must calculate the end-member proportions for all distinct subsets of linearly independent end-members. The dominant end-member over all sets of end-member proportions with all proportions positive is the dominant end-member. Thus for any mineral formula, the dominant end-member formula may be identified and serves to uniquely characterize and identify the mineral. The arguments used here are illustrated by reference to the minerals of the garnet supergroup.

Fanfaniite, Ca4Mn2+Al4(PO4)6(OH)4·12H2O, from the Hühnerkobel pegmatite mine, Bavaria, has been characterised by chemical analyses and synchrotron single-crystal diffraction. The average crystal structure was refined in space group C2/c (cell parameters a = 10.055(2), b = 24.132(5), c = 6.2590(10) Å, β = 91.35(3)°) to compare with reported monoclinic structures of other calcioferrite-group minerals with general formula Ca4AB4(PO4)6(OH)4·12H2O, A = Mn2+, Fe2+, Mg, B = Al, Fe3+. The average structure contains disordered half-occupied A sites and associated coordinated water molecules. The diffraction data for fanfaniite contains weak reflections that violate the c-glide condition, as also reported for montgomeryite, and in addition contains extremely weak, diffuse reflections requiring a doubling of a, as reported for kingsmountite. Structure refinements were conducted for the noncentrosymmetric C2 model used for montgomeryite and for the P$\bar 1$ model used for kingsmountite. The fanfaniite diffraction data is better explained by the triclinic model with doubled a cell parameter, although the extent of ordering of the A-site cations is considerably lower (56%) than reported for kingsmountite (85%). If the C2 model contributes, it can only be at the scale of the unit cell.

Modern supply chains are vital to global commerce, but they are also major contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. As climate change intensifies, achieving carbon neutrality – particularly through supply chain decarbonisation – has become a global imperative. While organisations have made strides in reducing direct emissions, addressing indirect supply chain emissions presents greater complexity and urgency. We invite academic contributions that examine the challenges, enablers, potential risks, strategic approaches and innovative practices related to decarbonisation across a wide range of sectors, including manufacturing, service industries and humanitarian logistics. Emphasis is placed on holistic, multi-stakeholder approaches aligned with the GHG Protocol. The issue welcomes interdisciplinary research employing varied methodologies – ranging from empirical studies to conceptual frameworks – to inform practice, policy and sustainability transitions. By showcasing sector-specific insights and cross-cutting solutions, this issue aims to advance knowledge and action in building low-carbon, resilient supply chains.

The ETn homologous row of the epidote–törnebohmite polysomatic series is considered, which includes minerals of the epidote (n = 0) and gatelite (n = 1) supergroups and radekškodaite group (n = 2). The crystal structures of members of the series are based upon the alternation of epidote (E) and törnebohmite (T) two-dimensional modules. The aristotype structure types of the members of the row crystallise in the P21/m space group with the unit-cell parameters a ≈ 8.90, b ≈ 5.65, c ≈ (10.10 + 7.50n) Å, β ≈ 116.5° and V ≈ (455 + 338n) Å3. The general formula for the members of the row can be expressed as A2(n+1)Mn+3[Si2O7][SiO4]2n+1Xn+2 (X = O, OH and F). The structure model for the hypothetical ET3 member of the series is constructed and the general formulae are derived for the calculation of the number of atoms per unit cell and the number and multiplicities of the atom sites for any value of n. The concept of K-sequence is introduced that is analogous to the concept of a Wyckoff sequence. The general formulae for the information-based complexity parameters are derived for the ETn homologous row of the epidote–törnebohmite polysomatic series with different parities of n. The present absence of the members of the series with n > 2 reflects the entropic restrictions on the polysomatic series that confirm the principle of maximal simplicity for modular inorganic structures.

The new mineral wiperamingaite, NaCaFe3+Al(PO4)F5(OH)·H2O, was found at the Wiperaminga Hill West Quarry, Boolcoomatta Reserve, Olary Province, South Australia, Australia where it has formed by hydrothermal alteration of triplite–zwieselite. Wiperamingaite occurs in a matrix of quartz, minor triplite and pyrite in association with fluorite, bermanite, leucophosphite and phosphosiderite. Crystals are transparent to translucent, brownish-orange to brownish-pink tablets, up to 0.25 mm across. The mineral has a white streak and vitreous lustre. It is brittle with a splintery fracture. The calculated density is 3.11 g/cm3. Optically, the mineral is biaxial (–) with α = 1.538(2), β = 1.599(2), γ = 1.614(2) (white light); 2V = 52(2)°; distinct r > v dispersion; orientation: X = a, Y = b, Z = c; pleochroism: X colourless, Y brown yellow, Z yellow; Y > Z > X.

Electron microprobe analysis provided the empirical formula Na0.97Ca1.01Fe3+0.92Al1.11(PO4)0.97F4.85(OH)1.32·0.95H2O. Wiperamingaite is orthorhombic, P212121, a = 5.3537(11), b = 5.5911(11), c = 26.279(5) Å, V = 786.6(3) Å3 and Z = 4. The structure of wiperamingaite contains chains of cis-corner connected Feφ6 octahedra (φ = O, OH and H2O) running parallel to [010] decorated with corner-connected PO4 tetrahedra. Adjacent chains link by corner-connection between the octahedra and tetrahedra to form sheets parallel to the (001) plane. Alφ6 octahedra (φ = O and F) attach to both sides of the sheets via corner-sharing with PO4 tetrahedra. Naφ11 polyhedra share edges and faces to form a layer between the sheets that links to the sheets via Alφ6 octahedra and Caφ8 polyhedra.