We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Let P be a finite, connected partially ordered set containing no crowns and let Q be a subset of P. Then the following conditions are equivalent: (1) Q is a retract of P; (2) Q is the set of fixed points of an order-preserving mapping of P to P; (3) Q is obtained from P by dismantling by irreducibles.
An asymptotic expansion is obtained for this sequence, of interest in combinatorial analysis. Values are given for the constants appearing in the leading term and a numerical comparison made.
The letters a, b, n, m, t (perhaps with suffixes) always denote natural numbers. A, B, S denote finite sets of natural numbers. |A| stands for the cardinality of A.
For a given constant c > 1 we say that the set A has property α(c) if there are at most c|A| differences a − b ≥ 0 for a, b ∈ A.
A. J. W. Hilton [5] conjectured that if P, Q are collections of subsets of a finite set S, with |S| = n, and |P| > 2n−2, |Q| ≥ 2n−2, then for some A ∈ P, B ∈ Q we have A ⊆ B or B ⊆ A. We here show that this assertion, indeed a stronger one, can be deduced from a result of D. J. Kleitman. We then give another proof of a recent result also proved by Lovász and by Schönheim.
Let En+1, for some integer n ≥ 0, be the (n + 1)-dimensional Euclidean space, and denote by Sn the standard n–sphere in En+1, . It is convenient to introduce the (–1)-dimensional sphere , where denotes the empty set. By an i-dimensional subsphere T of Sn, i = 0 n, we understand the intersection of Sn with some (i+1)-dimensional subspace of En+1. The affine hull of T always contains, with this definition, the origin of En+1. is the unique (–1)-dimensional subsphere of Sn. By the spherical hull, sph X, of a set , we understand the intersection of all subspheres of Sn containing X. Further we set dim X: = dim sph X. The interior, the boundary and the complement of an arbitrary set , with respect to Sn, shall be denoted by int X, bd X and cpl X. Finally we define the relative interior rel int X to be the interior of with respect to the usual topology sphZ . For each (n–1)-dimensional subsphere of Sn defines two closed hemispheres of Sn, whose common boundary it is. The two hemispheres of the sphere Sº are denned to be the two one-pointed subsets of Sº. A subset is called a closed (spherical) polytope, if it is the intersection of finitely many closed hemispheres, and, if, in addition, it does not contain a subsphere of Sn. is called an i-dimensional, relatively open polytope, , or shortly an i-open polytope, if there exists a closed polytope such that dim P = i and Q = rel int P. is called a closed polyhedron, if it is a finite union of closed polytopes P1 …, Pr. The empty set is the only (–1)-dimensional closed polyhedron of Sn. We denote by the set of all closed polyhedra of Sn. is called an i-open polyhedron, for some , if there are finitely many i-open polytopes Q1 …, Qr in Sn such that , and dim . By we denote the set of all i-open polyhedra. Clearly for all , and each i-dimensional subsphere of Sn, , belongs to and to , For each i-dimensional subsphere T of Sn, set . A map is defined by , for all , and, for all .
In [1], A. H. Stone proved that for a cardinal number k ≥ 1 a set with a transitive relation can be partitioned into k cofinal subsets provided each element of the set has at least k successors. Using methods quite different from those of Stone, we show that for k ≥ ℵ0 the same condition on successors guarantees that a set on which there are defined not more than k transitive relations can be partitioned into k sets each of which is cofinal with respect to each of the relations. We also show that such a partition exists even if some of the relations are not transitive as long as the non-transitive relations have no more than k elements.