We prove several results showing that every locally finite Borel graph whose large-scale geometry is ‘tree-like’ induces a treeable equivalence relation. In particular, our hypotheses hold if each component of the original graph either has bounded tree-width or is quasi-isometric to a tree, answering a question of Tucker-Drob. In the latter case, we moreover show that there exists a Borel quasi-isometry to a Borel forest, under the additional assumption of (componentwise) bounded degree. We also extend these results on quasi-treeings to Borel proper metric spaces. In fact, our most general result shows treeability of countable Borel equivalence relations equipped with an abstract wallspace structure on each class obeying some local finiteness conditions, which we call a proper walling. The proof is based on the Stone duality between proper wallings and median graphs (i.e., CAT(0) cube complexes). Finally, we strengthen the conclusion of treeability in these results to hyperfiniteness in the case where the original graph has one (selected) end per component, generalizing the same result for trees due to Dougherty–Jackson–Kechris.

We prove that there exists a left-c.e. Polish space not homeomorphic to any right-c.e. space. Combined with some other recent works (to be cited), this finishes the task of comparing all classical notions of effective presentability of Polish spaces that frequently occur in the literature up to homeomorphism.

We employ our techniques to provide a new, relatively straightforward construction of a computable Polish space K not homeomorphic to any computably compact space. We also show that the Banach space $C(K;\mathbb {R})$ has a computable Banach copy; this gives a negative answer to a question raised by McNicholl.

We also give an example of a space that has both a left-c.e. and a right-c.e. presentation, yet it is not homeomorphic to any computable Polish space. In addition, we provide an example of a $\Delta ^0_2$ Polish space that lacks both a left-c.e. and a right-c.e. copy, up to homeomorphism.

In a paper from 1980, Shelah constructed an uncountable group all of whose proper subgroups are countable. Assuming the continuum hypothesis, he constructed an uncountable group G that moreover admits an integer n satisfying that for every uncountable $X\subseteq G$, every element of G may be written as a group word of length n in the elements of X. The former is called a Jónsson group, and the latter is called a Shelah group.

In this paper, we construct a Shelah group on the grounds of $\textsf {{ZFC}}$ alone – that is, without assuming the continuum hypothesis. More generally, we identify a combinatorial condition (coming from the theories of negative square-bracket partition relations and strongly unbounded subadditive maps) sufficient for the construction of a Shelah group of size $\kappa $, and we prove that the condition holds true for all successors of regular cardinals (such as $\kappa =\aleph _1,\aleph _2,\aleph _3,\ldots $). This also yields the first consistent example of a Shelah group of size a limit cardinal.

In this paper we first consider hyperfinite Borel equivalence relations with a pair of Borel $\mathbb {Z}$-orderings. We define a notion of compatibility between such pairs, and prove a dichotomy theorem which characterizes exactly when a pair of Borel $\mathbb {Z}$-orderings are compatible with each other. We show that, if a pair of Borel $\mathbb {Z}$-orderings are incompatible, then a canonical incompatible pair of Borel $\mathbb {Z}$-orderings of $E_0$ can be Borel embedded into the given pair. We then consider hyperfinite-over-finite equivalence relations, which are countable Borel equivalence relations admitting Borel $\mathbb {Z}^2$-orderings. We show that if a hyperfinite-over-hyperfinite equivalence relation E admits a Borel $\mathbb {Z}^2$-ordering which is self-compatible, then E is hyperfinite.

We prove that any compact R-analytic group is linear when R is a pro-p domain of characteristic zero.

The distinction of the semantic spaces of elements and types is common practice in practically all type systems. A few type systems, including some early ones, have been proposed whose semantic space has functions only, i.e., depending on the context functions may play element roles as well as type roles. All of these systems are either lacking expressive power, in particular, polymorphism, or they violate uniqueness of types. This work presents for the first time a function-based type system in which typing is a relation between functions and which is using an ordering of functions to introduce bounded polymorphism. The ordering is based on an infinite set of top objects, itself strictly linearly ordered, each of which characterizes a certain function space. These top objects are predicative in the sense that a function using some top object cannot be smaller than this object. The interpretation of proposition as types and elements as proofs remains valid and is extended by viewing the ordering between types as logical implication. The proposed system can be shown to satisfy confluence and subject reduction. Furthermore one can show that the ordering is a partial order, every set of expressions has a maximal element, and there is a (unique) minimal, logically strongest, type among all types of an element. The latter result implies an alternative notion of uniqueness of types. Strong normalisation is the deepest property and its proof is based on a well-founded relation defined over a subsystem of expressions without eliminators. Semantic abstraction of the objects involved in typing, i.e., to use functions in element as well as type roles in a relational setting, is the major contribution of function-based type systems. This work shows that dependent products are not necessary for defining type systems with bounded polymorphism, rather it presents a consistent system with bounded polymorphism and minimal types where typing is a relation between partially ordered functions.

The concept of stability has proved very useful in the field of Banach space geometry. In this note, we introduce and study a corresponding concept in the setting of Banach algebras, which we call multiplicative stability. As we shall prove, various interesting examples of Banach algebras are multiplicatively unstable, and hence unstable in the model-theoretic sense. The examples include Fourier algebras over noncompact amenable groups, $C^*$-algebras and the measure algebra of an infinite compact group.

In this paper we study logical bilateralism understood as a theory of two primitive derivability relations, namely provability and refutability, in a language devoid of a primitive strong negation and without a falsum constant, $\bot $, and a verum constant, $\top $. There is thus no negation that toggles between provability and refutability, and there are no primitive constants that are used to define an “implies falsity” negation and a “co-implies truth” co-negation. This reduction of expressive power notwithstanding, there remains some interaction between provability and refutability due to the presence of (i) a conditional and the refutability condition of conditionals and (ii) a co-implication and the provability condition of co-implications. Moreover, assuming a hyperconnexive understanding of refuting conditionals and a dual understanding of proving co-implications, neither non-trivial negation inconsistency nor hyperconnexivity is lost for unary negation connectives definable by means of certain surrogates of falsum and verum. Whilst a critical attitude towards $\bot $ and $\top $ can be justified by problematic aspects of the Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov interpretation of the logical operations for these constants, the aim to reduce the availability of a toggling negation and observations on undefinability may also give further reasons to abandon $\bot $ and $\top $.

The notion of global supervenience captures the idea that the overall distribution of certain properties in the world is fixed by the overall distribution of certain other properties. A formal implementation of this idea in constant-domain Kripke models is as follows: predicates $Q_1,\dots ,Q_m$ globally supervene on predicates $P_1,\dots ,P_n$ in world w if two successors of w cannot differ with respect to the extensions of the $Q_i$ without also differing with respect to the extensions of the $P_i$. Equivalently: relative to the successors of w, the extensions of the $Q_i$ are functionally determined by the extensions of the $P_i$. In this paper, we study this notion of global supervenience, achieving three things. First, we prove that claims of global supervenience cannot be expressed in standard modal predicate logic. Second, we prove that they can be expressed naturally in an inquisitive extension of modal predicate logic, where they are captured as strict conditionals involving questions; as we show, this also sheds light on the logical features of global supervenience, which are tightly related to the logical properties of strict conditionals and questions. Third, by making crucial use of the notion of coherence, we prove that the relevant system of inquisitive modal logic is compact and has a recursively enumerable set of validities; these properties are non-trivial, since in this logic a strict conditional expresses a second-order quantification over sets of successors.

In this paper, we show that $\mathsf {ZFC}+\mathsf {WA}_{n+1}$ implies the consistency of $\mathsf {ZFC}+\mathsf {WA}_n$ for $n\ge 0$. We also prove that $\mathsf {ZFC}+\mathsf {WA}_n$ is finitely axiomatizable, and $\mathsf {ZFC}+\mathsf {WA}$ is not finitely axiomatizable unless it is inconsistent.

We study the computational problem of rigorously describing the asymptotic behavior of topological dynamical systems up to a finite but arbitrarily small pre-specified error. More precisely, we consider the limit set of a typical orbit, both as a spatial object (attractor set) and as a statistical distribution (physical measure), and we prove upper bounds on the computational resources of computing descriptions of these objects with arbitrary accuracy. We also study how these bounds are affected by different dynamical constraints and provide several examples showing that our bounds are sharp in general. In particular, we exhibit a computable interval map having a unique transitive attractor with Cantor set structure supporting a unique physical measure such that both the attractor and the measure are non-computable.

Some informal arguments are valid, others are invalid. A core application of logic is to tell us which is which by capturing these validity facts. Philosophers and logicians have explored how well a host of logics carry out this role, familiar examples being propositional, first-order and second-order logic. Since natural language and standard logics are countable, a natural question arises: is there a countable logic guaranteed to capture the validity patterns of any language fragment? That is, is there a countable omega-universal logic? Our article philosophically motivates this question, makes it precise, and then answers it. It is a self-contained, concise sequel to ‘Capturing Consequence’ by A.C. Paseau (RSL vol. 12, 2019).

Using iterated Sacks forcing and topological games, we prove that the existence of a totally imperfect Menger set in the Cantor cube with cardinality continuum is independent from ZFC. We also analyze the structure of Hurewicz and consonant subsets of the Cantor cube in the Sacks model.

This paper focuses on the structurally complete extensions of the system $\mathbf {R}$-mingle ($\mathbf {RM}$). The main theorem demonstrates that the set of all hereditarily structurally complete extensions of $\mathbf {RM}$ is countably infinite and forms an almost-chain, with only one branching element. As a corollary, we show that the set of structurally complete extensions of $\mathbf {RM}$ that are not hereditary is also countably infinite and forms a chain. Using algebraic methods, we provide a complete description of both sets. Furthermore, we offer a characterization of passive structural completeness among the extensions of $\mathbf {RM}$: specifically, we prove that a quasivariety of Sugihara algebras is passively structurally complete if and only if it excludes two specific algebras. As a corollary, we give an additional characterization of quasivarieties of Sugihara algebras that are passively structurally complete but not structurally complete. We close the paper with a characterization of actively structurally complete quasivarieties of Sugihara algebras.

We investigate Steel’s conjecture in ‘The Core Model Iterability Problem’ [10], that if $\mathcal {W}$ and $\mathcal {R}$ are $\Omega +1$-iterable, $1$-small weasels, then $\mathcal {W}\leq ^{*}\mathcal {R}$ iff there is a club $C\subset \Omega $ such that for all $\alpha \in C$, if $\alpha $ is regular, then $\alpha ^{+\mathcal {W}}\leq \alpha ^{+\mathcal {R}}$. We will show that the conjecture fails, assuming that there is an iterable premouse M which models KP and which has a -Woodin cardinal. On the other hand, we show that assuming there is no transitive model of KP with a Woodin cardinal the conjecture holds. In the course of this we will also show that if M is a premouse which models KP with a largest, regular, uncountable cardinal $\delta $, and $\mathbb {P} \in M$ is a forcing poset such that $M\models "\mathbb {P}\text { has the }\delta \text {-c.c.}"$, and $g\subset \mathbb {P}$ is M-generic, then $M[g]\models \text {KP}$. Additionally, we study the preservation of admissibility under iteration maps. At last, we will prove a fact about the closure of the set of ordinals at which a weasel has the S-hull property. This answers another question implicit in remarks in [10].

We show that if a field A is not pseudo-finite, then there is no prime model of the theory of pseudo-finite fields over A. Assuming GCH, we extend this result to $\kappa $-prime models, for $\kappa $ an uncountable cardinal or $\aleph _\varepsilon $.

We argue that logicism, the thesis that mathematics is reducible to logic and analytic truths, is true. We do so by (a) developing a formal framework with comprehension and abstraction principles, (b) giving reasons for thinking that this framework is part of logic, (c) showing how the denotations for predicates and individual terms of an arbitrary mathematical theory can be viewed as logical objects that exist in the framework, and (d) showing how each theorem of a mathematical theory can be given an analytically true reading in the logical framework.

We argue that some of Brouwer’s assumptions, rejected by Bishop, should be considered and studied as possible axioms. We show that Brouwer’s Continuity Principle enables one to prove an intuitionistic Borel Hierarchy Theorem. We also explain that Brouwer’s Fan Theorem is useful for a development of the theory of measure and integral different from the one worked out by Bishop. We show that Brouwer’s bar theorem not only proves the Fan Theorem but also a stronger statement that we call the Almost-fan Theorem. The Almost-fan Theorem implies intuitionistic versions of Ramsey’s Theorem and the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem.

We study H-structures associated with $SU$-rank 1 measurable structures. We prove that the $SU$-rank of the expansion is continuous and that it is uniformly definable in terms of the parameters of the formulas. We also introduce notions of dimension and measure for definable sets in the expansion and prove they are uniformly definable in terms of the parameters of the formulas.

We prove various iteration theorems for forcing classes related to subproper and subcomplete forcing, introduced by Jensen. In the first part, we use revised countable support iterations, and show that 1) the class of subproper, ${}^\omega \omega $-bounding forcing notions, 2) the class of subproper, T-preserving forcing notions (where T is a fixed Souslin tree) and 3) the class of subproper, $[T]$-preserving forcing notions (where T is an $\omega _1$-tree) are iterable with revised countable support. In the second part, we adopt Miyamoto’s theory of nice iterations, rather than revised countable support. We show that this approach allows us to drop a technical condition in the definitions of subcompleteness and subproperness, still resulting in forcing classes that are iterable in this way, preserve $\omega _1$, and, in the case of subcompleteness, don’t add reals. Further, we show that the analogs of the iteration theorems proved in the first part for RCS iterations hold for nice iterations as well.