Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T03:12:54.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Knowing, believing, and acting as if you know

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2021

Dilip Ninan*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Tufts University, Miner Hall, Medford, MA02155, USA. dilip.ninan@tufts.edu; http://www.dilipninan.org

Abstract

Phillips et al. argue that our capacity for representing knowledge is more basic than our capacity for representing belief. But they remain neutral on the further claim that our “belief capacity” depends on our “knowledge capacity.” I consider how this further claim might help to explain some of the generalizations the authors catalog, and explore one way of understanding it.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

German, T. P., & Nichols, S. (2003). Children's counterfactual inferences about long and short causal chains. Developmental Science, 6(5), 514523. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Schulz, B., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). Knowing that P without believing that P. Noûs, 47(2), 371384. doi: 10.1111/nous.12022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. (1966). Knowledge: By examples. Analysis, 27(1), 111. doi: 10.2307/3326979.Google Scholar
Riggs, K. J., Peterson, D. M., Robinson, E. J., & Mitchell, P. (1998). Are errors in false belief tasks symptomatic of a broader difficulty with counterfactuality? Cognitive Development, 13(1), 7390. doi: 10.1016/s0885-2014(98)90021-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/019925656X.001.0001.Google Scholar
Yablo, S. (2014). Aboutness. Princeton University Press. doi: 10.23943/princeton/9780691144955.001.0001.Google Scholar