To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This essay revisits the metanormative version of the motivational critique of contemporary conceptions of cosmopolitan justice. I distinguish two ways of understanding this critique as leveling the charge of infeasibility against cosmopolitanism. Cosmopolitan motivation can be understood to be infeasible because it is impossible or because it is not reasonably likely to be achieved if tried. The possibilistic understanding is not persuasive, given that examples show that cosmopolitan motivation is possible. The conditional probabilistic understanding is more compelling, by contrast, because under certain social conditions it may not be reasonably likely that cosmopolitan motivation is achieved if tried. I argue, however, that whether cosmopolitan motivation is infeasible in the conditional probabilistic sense depends on malleable social conditions, given that, according to a plastic account of the human moral mind developed by Allen Buchanan, social conditions can undermine or favor the formation of cosmopolitan motivation. I illustrate this plastic account by showing how it can explain recent anticosmopolitan orientations as “tribalistic” reflexes to global crises, like the COVID-19 pandemic, which involved competition for survival resources and (existential) threats. I conclude that cosmopolitan motivation is not infeasible under all social conditions and that cosmopolitanism therefore requires bringing about and maintaining those social conditions under which cosmopolitan motivation is feasible.
During minima of solar activity, it is possible to estimate the influence of convection zone turbulence on the magnetic flux tubes forming active regions (ARs), because the toroidal field of the old cycle weakens, and the new toroidal field is still weak. We analyzed ARs of solar minima between 23-24 and 24-25 solar cycles. ARs were classified as regular, irregular and unipolar spots. Regular ARs follow the empirical laws consistent with the Babcock–Leighton dynamo theory. We found that regular ARs dominate by flux and by number during the solar minima. Irregular ARs are mainly represented by bipolar structures of deformed orientation and contribute only one-third in the total flux and one-third in the total number. Very complex multipolar ARs are extremely rare. So, during solar minima the global dynamo still guides the formation of ARs, whereas the turbulence only slightly affects the toroidal flux tubes orientation.
Solar activity shows an 11-year (quasi)periodicity with a pronounced, but limited variability of the cycle amplitudes. The properties of active region (AR) emergence play an important role in the modulation of solar cycles and are our central concern in building a model for predicting future cycle(s) in the framework of the Babcock–Leighton (BL)-type dynamo. The emergence of ARs has the property that strong cycles tend to have higher mean latitudes and lower tilt angle coefficients. Their non-linear feedbacks on the solar cycle are referred to as latitudinal quenching and tilt quenching, respectively. Meanwhile, the stochastic properties of AR emergence, e.g., rogue ARs, limit the scope of the solar cycle prediction. For physics-based prediction models of the solar cycle, we suggest that uncertainties in both the observed magnetograms assimilated as the initial field and the properties of the AR emergence should be taken into account.
Systematic killing has long been associated with some of the darkest episodes in human history. Increasingly, however, it is framed as a desirable outcome in war, particularly in the context of military AI and lethal autonomy. Autonomous weapons systems, defenders argue, will surpass humans not only militarily but also morally, enabling a more precise and dispassionate mode of violence, free of the emotion and uncertainty that too often weaken compliance with the rules and standards of war. We contest this framing. Drawing on the history of systematic killing, we argue that lethal autonomous weapons systems reproduce, and in some cases intensify, the moral challenges of the past. Autonomous violence incentivizes a moral devaluation of those targeted and erodes the moral agency of those who kill. Both outcomes imperil essential restraints on the use of military force.
In 2022, the Camden Coalition Medical-Legal Partnership began providing civil and criminal legal services to substance use disorder patients at Cooper University Health Care’s Center for Healing. This paper discusses early findings from the program’s first year on the efficacy of the provision of criminal-legal representation, which is uncommon among MLPs and critical for this patient population. The paper concludes with takeaways for other programs providing legal services in an addiction medicine setting.
While the challenges of family law reform and barriers to justice are widely studied, there is a gap in our understanding of the gendered nature of the use of courts in West Africa. Through analysis of judicial decisions in Courts of First Instance (Tribunaux de Première Instance) in Allada and Cotonou, Benin, this article examines how women and men use lower courts in family law cases. This article finds that despite barriers to access to formal institutions, women use these courts in equal numbers as do men, and they use them for divorce, as well as to claim child custody, child-support and alimony. Men mostly use family law courts to determine paternity and to seek divorce. Despite a widespread lack of confidence in courts and tribunals, these Courts of First Instance are a tool for women to challenge social hierarchy and to claim rights for themselves and their children.