To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Amid profoundly unstable and vulnerable times, conventional education systems continue to reflect the dominant ideology in modernity that has contributed to the current global polycrisis. This study explores how educators engage in vernacular pedagogical practices, locally grounded, relational and often situated outside standard curricula, that act as counterpoints to the conventional constraints using a Place-Based Education (PBE) approach. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 14 educators from the Southeast Michigan Stewardship (SEMIS) Coalition, the research investigates how educators experience job satisfaction, define their roles and navigate tensions between dominant norms and community-rooted learning. Findings suggest that educators embrace indeterminism as a source of creativity, responsiveness and growth, weaving together interlaced strands of personal, cultural and ecological meaning in their vernacular pedagogical practices. Educators carve out alternative ways of knowing and relating, positioning PBE as a cultural stance that enables responsive, locally rooted reform amid today’s complex, uncertain and interconnected crises.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, described by Chancellor Olaf Scholz as a Zeitenwende (turning point) triggered a fundamental rethinking of German foreign, security, and defence policy. This article conceptualises the invasion as a temporal shock to Germany’s ontological security. Building on the ‘temporal turn’ in International Relations, we argue that the war not only violated Ukraine’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity, but it also disrupted a broader sense of chronological continuity in European security, long defined by reduced defence spending and the assumption that interstate war was obsolete. Where previous studies have focused on the interrelationship of ontological security and temporality built around the concepts of biographical continuity, collective memory, and mnemonical security, this paper focuses instead on narrative disruption and the retiming of national security and identity via the perception of external shocks. We contend that the Zeitenwende narrative challenged historical concepts of German ontological security, such as Ostpolitik and Wandel durch Handel, that were deeply embedded in a strategic culture of military reticence by calling for the revitalisation of German military power. Yet this retiming remains constrained by incremental policy implementation and historical associations with Germany’s militaristic past, creating ongoing ontological insecurity about Germany’s role in European security.
The impact of two-dimensional (2-D) periodic forcing on transition dynamics in laminar separation bubbles (LSBs) generated on a flat plate is investigated experimentally. Laminar separation is caused by the favourable-to-adverse pressure gradient under an inverted modified NACA $64_3\text{-}618$ and periodic disturbances are generated by an alternating current dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator located near the onset of the adverse pressure gradient. Surface pressure and time-resolved particle image velocimetry measurements along the centreline and several wall-parallel planes show significant reductions in bubble size with active flow control. Periodic excitation leads to amplification of the Kelvin–Helmholtz (K–H) instability resulting in strong 2-D coherent roller structures. Spanwise modulation of these structures is observed and varies with the forcing amplitude. Intermediate forcing amplitudes result in periodic spanwise deformation of the mean flow at large wavelength ($\lambda _z/L_{b,5kVpp} \approx 0.76$). For high-amplitude forcing, the spanwise modulation of the mean flow agrees with the much smaller wavelength of the difference interaction of two oblique subharmonic modes ($\lambda _z/L_{b,5kVpp} \approx 0.24$). Modal decomposition shows nonlinear interaction of the forced 2-D mode leading to growth of subharmonic and harmonic content, and the observation of several half-harmonics ($[n+1/2]f_{\textit{AFC}}$) at intermediate forcing amplitudes. Strongest amplitudes of the 2-D mode and delay of transition downstream of the time-averaged reattachment are observed for the intermediate forcing amplitudes, previously only observed in numerical simulations. Consistent with numerical results, further increase of the forcing amplitude leads to rapid breakdown to turbulence in the LSB. This suggests that the most effective exploitation of the K–H instability for transition delay is connected to an optimal (moderate) forcing amplitude.
The chapter interrogates the value of applying the feminist judgment methodology (FJM) to the International Criminal Court (ICC), addressing skepticism about whether such projects are merely wishful thinking. Through the metaphor of fairy tales, McLoughlin examines tensions between feminist legal theory and judicial practice, arguing that feminist judgments are not simply acts of imagination but demonstrate real possibilities within existing legal frameworks. McLoughlin makes two key arguments for extending the FJM to the ICC. First, the ICC’s poor record on gender justice, including limited convictions for sexual and gender-based crimes, makes it an important site for feminist intervention. Second, the Rome Statute’s unrealised promise of gender justice - including provisions for gender expertise and representation - provides a firm foundation for feminist judicial approaches. The chapter concludes that feminist judgment writing serves to legitimise gender-sensitive approaches to international criminal law while acknowledging law’s limitations and demonstrates how the ICC’s commitment to gender justice could be meaningfully realised through feminist judicial practice.
Benjamin Britten’s Noye’s Fludde (1958) was arguably the first community opera with an environmental message. It explored the potential extinction of animal and human life, and since then environmentalism as a social issue has begun to emerge in community operas as a distinctive trope. This article examines some more recent examples produced in the UK, from The Split Goose Feather (1979) by Christopher Brown, to Timber! (1990) by Timothy Kraemer, to Russell Hepplewhite’s Till the Summer Comes Again (2012) inspired by Glyndebourne’s wind turbine. It concludes with some reflections on the questions that arise in relation to contemporary opera, the environment and sustainability – notably how the professional operatic world can respond to concerns about the environment, and what steps are necessary to ensure the sustainability of opera for the future.
To synthesize evidence on the relations among multiple constructs, measures, or concepts, meta-analyzing correlation matrices across primary studies has become a crucial analytic approach. Common meta-analytic approaches employ univariate or multivariate models to estimate a pooled correlation matrix, which is subjected to further analyses, such as structural equation modeling. In practice, meta-analysts often extract multiple correlation matrices per study from various samples, study sites, labs, or countries, thus introducing hierarchical effect size multiplicity into the meta-analytic data. However, this feature has largely been ignored when pooling correlation matrices for meta-analysis. To contribute to the methodological development in this area, we describe a multilevel, multivariate, and random-effects modeling approach, which pools correlation matrices meta-analytically and, at the same time, addresses hierarchical effect size multiplicity. Specifically, it allows meta-analysts to test various assumptions on the dependencies among random effects, aiding the selection of a meta-analytic baseline model. We describe this approach, present four working models within it, and illustrate them with an example and the corresponding R code.
This paper explores the impact of handle silicon substrate resistivity on substrate noise coupling and its influence on the spectral purity of voltage-controlled oscillators (VCOs). Three VCOs were designed using the 28 nm fully depleted silicon-on-insulator (FD-SOI) technology and fabricated on process-of-reference wafer featuring a handle Si substrate resistivity value of 10 Ω.cm and also on high-resistivity (HR) Si handle wafer of 1 kΩ.cm. The output spectrum of the VCOs was measured under two conditions: with and without a 0 dBm noise signal injected into the substrate. The results demonstrate that passivated HR substrates achieve more than 26 dB reduction in parasitic spurs induced by substrate noise. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this work presents the first fabrication and measurement of VCOs on HR substrates in FD-SOI technology, highlighting their effectiveness in mitigating substrate noise coupling.
Answering a question of Kaye, we show that the compositional truth theory with the full collection scheme is conservative over Peano Arithmetic. We demonstrate it by showing that countable models of compositional truth which satisfy the internal induction or collection axioms can be end-extended to models of the respective theory.
The chapter reproduces Gopalan’s speech delivered at the International Criminal Court’s 20th anniversary conference at The Hague in 2022, examining intersectional approaches to investigating and prosecuting sexual and gender-based crimes in international criminal law. Gopalan explains intersectionality as an analytical framework that reveals how multiple identities and systems of oppression shape international crimes. Through case studies including Korean "comfort women," Srebrenica’s Muslim women, and Tamil male survivors in Sri Lanka, she demonstrates how factors like gender, colonialism, class, ethnicity, and religion intersect to create distinct patterns of harm and victimisation. Gopalan argues that while gender analysis has advanced understanding of sexual violence, examining gender alone is insufficient. Her analysis reveals how intersectional approaches can uncover overlooked structural inequalities and make visible what might otherwise remain unseen, enabling more comprehensive and survivor-responsive justice processes. The speech argues for expanding investigative and prosecutorial frameworks beyond single-axis analysis to better serve the complex realities of survivors.
Edited by
Marietta Auer, Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory,Paul B. Miller, University of Notre Dame, Indiana,Henry E. Smith, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts,James Toomey, University of Iowa
Edited by
Marietta Auer, Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory,Paul B. Miller, University of Notre Dame, Indiana,Henry E. Smith, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts,James Toomey, University of Iowa
Reinach believed that basic legal concepts exist, that their existence is independent of the positive law, and their existence is independent of moral obligation. In this idiosyncratic juxtaposition of positions, Reinach is joined by contemporary theorists drawing on evolutionary psychology and cognitive science in jurisprudence. But Reinach emphatically insisted that his claims were ontological, not psychological. This chapter explains why. For Reinach himself, the ontological status of legal concepts was one front in a broader debate over whether basic mathematical and logical concepts were true a priori or features of human psychology; a demonstrative project in the breadth of the a priori. But it is suggested that today’s theorists need not be as preoccupied with this distinction as Reinach was. Not only is the practical difference between ontological and evolutionary theories not as wide as Reinach seems to have assumed, but arguments for metaphysical reality in other domains are substantially less persuasive as applied to Reinach’s legal concepts.
Edited by
Marietta Auer, Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory,Paul B. Miller, University of Notre Dame, Indiana,Henry E. Smith, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts,James Toomey, University of Iowa
Edited by
Marietta Auer, Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory,Paul B. Miller, University of Notre Dame, Indiana,Henry E. Smith, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts,James Toomey, University of Iowa
Reinach’s thesis that there is a legal a priori is as bold as it is interesting. It is bold because it excludes all sources of positive law and claims that certain legal propositions can be known independent of all actual legal systems. The thesis is especially interesting as it does not rely on natural law but rather on immediate insight into a priori legal propositions. Given the great variety of possible a priori propositions, the chapter focuses on necessary, essential, and nonpositive ones. All of them do not reveal a legal a priori, which casts the existence of a legal a priori into doubt. However, the phenomenon of self-evident propositions remains important. One just needs to analyse them differently with the help of nonpositive legal reasons.
Making sense of paradata as information on practices and processes is both a matter of theory and practice. This chapter introduces a comprehensive theoretical reference model for paradata and discusses its practical implications. Paradata is approached as a category of things that can be appropriated as being informative about processes and practices. Working knowledge on practices and processes, and the practices and processes themselves, can create paradata through both embodiment and acts of inscription. Paradata turns back to working knowledge through appropriation. Enactment turns paradata back to practices and processes. Paradata materialises as a process and network-like meshwork in space-time. It is perpetually in the making and stabilised momentarily only at times when it is taken into use.
Assessing fit in common factor models solely through the lens of mean and covariance structures, as is commonly done with conventional goodness-of-fit (GOF) assessments, may overlook critical aspects of misfit, potentially leading to misleading conclusions. To achieve more flexible fit assessment, we extend the theory of generalized residuals (Haberman & Sinharay, 2013), originally developed for models with categorical data, to encompass more general measurement models. Within this extended framework, we propose several fit test statistics designed to evaluate various parametric assumptions involved in common factor models. The examples include assessing the distributional assumptions of latent variables and the functional form assumptions of individual manifest variables. The performance of the proposed statistics is examined through simulation studies and an empirical data analysis. Our findings suggest that generalized residuals are promising tools for detecting misfit in measurement models, often masked when assessed by conventional GOF testing methods.
Paradata is a concept that is very much in the making. Its significance is not given and it can matter in different ways depending on context and how the notion itself is operationalised in use. Paradata complements earlier metainformation concepts for knowledge organisation in how it can facilitate systematising and making the complexity of data, practices and processes visible. As a mindset, paradata underlines the importance of being involved both in the theory and practice of how data is constantly being made and remade. There are, however, practical and ethical limits to what paradata can do and how far, and where are the limits of what is desirable to do with it. Ultimately, mastering the use of paradata and making it matter is also a question of literacy, tightly interwoven in the intricate meshwork of the social reality of the domains where it is put to work.
The chapter presents a dialogue between Mudukuti and Chappell, examining critical challenges facing the International Criminal Court (ICC) through the lens of Mudukuti’s experience as practitioner, advocate, and trainer. Drawing on her work at the ICC, domestic courts, and civil society organizations, Mudukuti highlights the urgent need for greater intersectionality in international criminal justice. The conversation focuses on institutional reform at the ICC, addressing the Court’s problematic staff composition where over half of professional positions are held by individuals from Western European and Other Groups. Mudukuti argues a lack of geographic, racial, and gender diversity in leadership affects how cases are approached, evidence is interpreted, and justice is delivered. The dialogue examines the role of civil society in advancing reform and the importance of amicus curiae briefs in bringing diverse perspectives to ICC cases, particularly regarding sexual violence. Mudukuti emphasizes that intersectionality requires transforming both institutional composition and judicial understanding through continuous learning and openness to different disciplinary perspectives.
One barrier to patients’ compliance in following instructions to take prescription medication is their memory of those instructions. Effective communication can be challenging with older adults, since people can use ineffective strategies to compensate for older adults’ presumed communication difficulties. The purpose of this study was to test whether older adults would benefit from gestures and/or props in hearing explanations of the appropriate use of prescription medication. Participants were 181 adults 65 years or older. They evaluated pharmacy students on their communication. Each participant watched video clips of pharmacy students explaining how to use fictional medications in three conditions: (1) speech only, (2) speech and gestures, and (3) speech and props. Participants were tested on their memory and rated the effectiveness of the communication of each pharmacy student. Participants showed no differences in memory across conditions. These findings do not support the use of gestures and/or props in effective communication with older adults.