This article critically examines how Web3 decentralization policy trends impact global digital governance, questioning whether they genuinely distribute power or merely shift influence to a new, tech-savvy elite. Based on fieldwork in Silicon Valley since August 2022 and engagement with scholars and practitioners up to December 2025, the article provides a conceptual analysis with emerging empirical insights around the nascent global Web3 movement. While Web3 advocates challenge centralized data monopolies and traditional state structures, this analysis critiques the assumption that Web3 democratizes power, highlighting both its potential for inclusion and risks of exclusion, insofar as it may reinforce hierarchies rooted in technical expertise and digital access. While acknowledging the broader landscape of Web3 governance (including hybrid and federated models) and scoping the Global North and Global South contexts considering global adoption cases, the article particularly focuses on three post-Westphalian paradigms: (i) Network States, (ii) Network Sovereignties, and (iii) Algorithmic Nations. While Network States advocate for crypto-libertarian governance, Network Sovereignties and Algorithmic Nations emphasize cooperative governance aimed at empowering minority communities, such as indigenous groups, stateless nations, and e-diasporas, through decentralized, data-driven systems. By engaging with both the limitations and some promises, prospects, and pitfalls of Web3, this article questions whether Web3 can create a more inclusive global order or if influence is increasingly concentrated among a new elite. This article contributes to debates on sovereignty, governance, and citizenship by advocating hybrid policy frameworks that balance global and local dynamics, emphasizing solidarity, digital justice, and international cooperation for equitable Web3 governance.

Quantum technologies have the potential to play a significant role in future technological and economic advancement. However, our understanding of the specific narratives and topics present in national quantum technology policies is limited, even though these policies are vital for shaping global strategies, progress, and responsible development in the field. In this study, we use narrative policy analysis together with computational topic modeling to examine 55 governmental documents from 24 countries, covering over a decade. Using BERTopic modeling and the Narrative Policy Framework, the results reveal that national initiatives primarily focus on technological leadership for security and economic prosperity, assessing technological readiness, and, to a lesser extent, commercialization, and societal impacts. Over time, we see a trend toward greater alignment in the prevalence of these narratives, with different themes beginning to be considered more equally. Nevertheless, the narrative surrounding responsible quantum development and societal implications remains the least represented. The study shows the strategic priorities of the analyzed countries and introduces an innovative method for analyzing policy texts. Based on the results, we recommend a balanced regulatory approach for quantum technologies that promotes ethical innovation, supports inclusive technological ecosystems, and encourages global collaboration. Furthermore, we caution that an excessive emphasis on leadership and competition may lead to isolated innovation systems that could hinder progress, cooperation, and joint efforts.

Following Entman’s observation that policy frames define social problems, diagnose causes and suggest remedies, we examined the strategies that 12 U.S. governors (from states matched according to population size and density, demographic composition, per capita incomes, geographic proximity, and COVID-19 incidence) used to frame COVID-19 policy agendas. After scraping the governors’ statements about COVID-19 from press releases issued from January 2020 to May 2023 (N = 14,629), we leveraged ChatGPT (GPT) to identify and assess the intensity of public health, economic stability, and civic vitality frames. Subsequent analysis explored differences in the framing strategies according to the governors’ political party and gender. In the process, this study underscores the importance of AI prompt engineering to realize GPT’s transformative potential to facilitate communication research by efficiently identifying and assessing the content of policy frames.

Analyzing topics and emotions in social media activism offers valuable insights into the competing voices that shape digital discourse. However, existing research has largely neglected the influence of geographic and linguistic diversity on public dialogue during crises. To address this gap, it is essential to recognize the varied perspectives of local communities and language groups. Doing so helps uncover specific local needs, ensures more inclusive representation, and supports the development of solutions that are responsive to the local context. We leverage machine learning models to analyze 1,036,111 public tweets from the #NoMore movement, including tweets containing #NoMore, #EthiopiaPrevails, and #SayNoMore. Our analysis examined the differences in content, emotional responses, and user influence by comparing tweets from Ethiopia and the United States (US), as well as those written in English and Amharic. The findings reveal distinct societal perspectives, emotional expressions, and opinion dynamics. Ethiopian users emphasized local issues with higher fear and joy responses, while users from the US leaned toward peace-related themes with spikes in anger. Amharic tweets focused on domestic concerns with greater emotional intensity than English tweets. These insights help surface region and language-specific perspectives often marginalized in mainstream coverage, paving the way for more inclusive and effective approaches to societal challenges.

The dynamics of information diffusion on social media platforms vary significantly between individual communities and the broader population. This study explores and compares the differences between community-based interventions and population-wide approaches in adjusting the spread of information. We first examine the temporal dynamics of social media groups, assessing their behavior through metrics such as time-dependent posts and retweets. Using functional data analysis, we investigate Twitter activities related to incidents such as the Skripal/Novichok case. We present three ways to quantify disparities between communities and uncover the strategies used by each group to promote specific narratives. We then compare the impact of targeted, community-based interventions with that of broader, population-wide responses in shaping the diffusion of information. Through this analysis, we identify key differences in how communities engage with and amplify information, revealing distinct patterns in the diffusion process. Our findings provide a comparative framework for understanding the relative consequences of different intervention strategies, offering insights into how targeted and broad approaches influence public discourse across social media platforms.

As data are becoming increasingly important resources for municipal administrations in the context of urban development, formalization of urban data governance (DG) is considered a prerequisite to systematic municipal data practice for the common good. Unlike for larger cities, it is unclear how common such formalized DG is in rural districts and small towns. We therefore mapped the current status quo in small municipalities in Germany as a case exemplifying the broader phenomenon. We systematically searched online for policy documents on DG in all metropolitan regions, all rural districts, and a quota sample of nearly a sixth of all German small towns. We then performed content analysis of the identified documents along predefined categories of urban development. Results show that hardly any small towns dispose of relevant policy documents. Rural districts are somewhat more active in formally defining DG. Identified policy documents tend to address mostly economic activities, social infrastructure, and demography, whereas Housing and Urban design and public space are among the least mentioned categories of urban development.

This review examines the legal, voluntary, and technical mechanisms that govern the ownership of nonpersonal agricultural data generated by IoT-enabled farm machinery, sensors, and related systems. Given that this data is not subject to personal data protection legislation such as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), its governance presents distinct challenges requiring alternative governance approaches. Drawing on 63 peer-reviewed studies published over the last decade, this review proposes an integrated conceptual framework comprising legal enforcement, voluntary governance, and technical enforcement mechanisms. A distinctive contribution of the study is to show that data ownership in agriculture becomes meaningful at the moment of data sharing, where rights claims are made visible, contested, or constrained, and that these three governance pathways must be understood jointly rather than in isolation. The analysis demonstrates that although farmers generate vast quantities of nonpersonal data, no existing legal framework explicitly grants them ownership, leaving ownership to be ambiguously allocated or de facto transferred through contracts in ways that limit their ability to contest access or downstream use. Technical mechanisms promise automated enforcement and accountability but risk codifying existing power asymmetries when the encoded rules reflect opaque or exclusionary terms. We argue for a shift from “ownership” to “data sovereignty” understood as the sustained capacity to define, monitor, and revoke conditions of data use. Achieving this requires three interlinked pillars: enforceable baseline access and use rights for farmers, accessible and preferably open-source technical infrastructure, and participatory governance arrangements.

Governments across the world are leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to render services to citizens. Emerging economies are not left behind in this transformation but remain a gaping distance behind in their integration into public-sector service delivery compared to the private sector. To ensure the effective integration of AI services by government agencies to serve citizens, it is necessary to understand the constellation of factors driving user adoption of AI. Therefore, this study answers the question: how can government-initiated AI services be successfully accepted by citizens? Leveraging non-probability sampling, a snowball sample of 245 tertiary student-workers from across Ghana was surveyed to solicit their knowledge, attitudes, readiness, and use intentions towards AI-enabled government services. The data were analysed using FsQCA and complemented by PLS-SEM to confirm the findings. The findings reveal four unique configurations, summarised into two broad groups; AI enthusiasts and AI sceptics that drive AI adoption in government services. Positive readiness factors, such as knowledge of AI and optimism towards AI, characterise AI enthusiasts. In contrast, those described as AI sceptics still adopt government AI services despite their reservations and general distrust. AI sceptics are a delicate group that sit at the boundary between adoption and rejection, requiring special attention and strategies to orient them towards adoption. The study recommends effective education and trust-building strategies to foster AI adoption in government services. The findings are essential for driving the efficient implementation of AI-enabled services among working-class citizens in emerging economies.

Narratives shape public perceptions and policymaking around emerging technologies like quantum technologies (QTs), yet what narratives develop across different societal domains remains underexplored. This study analyzes narratives about QTs in 36 government documents, 163 business reports, and 2023 media articles published over the past 23 years, using a mixed-methods approach that combines topic modeling with qualitative thematic analysis. We find that the dystopian or utopian extremes associated with technologies such as artificial intelligence are largely absent from discourse about QTs. Media coverage tends to cover a broad range of topics, while business and government narratives emphasize technical milestones, economic competitiveness, and national security, frequently at the expense of questions about ethics, equity, and accessibility. We discuss the implications of this focus, particularly the risk that an emphasis on zero-sum geopolitical competition could foster a more closed and fragmented innovation ecosystem.

Blockchain technology has attracted attention from public sector agencies, mainly for its perceived potential to improve transparency, data integrity, and administrative processes. However, its concrete value and applicability within government settings remain contested, and real-world adoption has been limited and uneven. This raises questions regarding the conditions that promote or impede adoption at the institutional level. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis is employed in this research to explore how the combined effects of national-level regulatory clarity, financial provision, digital readiness, and ecosystem engagement shape patterns of blockchain adoption in the European public sector. Rather than identifying any single factor as decisive, our findings reveal a plurality of institutional paths leading to high adoption intensity, with regulatory certainty and European Union funding appearing most frequently on high-consistency paths. In contrast, digital readiness indicators and national research and development budgets are substitutable, challenging resource-based perceptions of technology adoption and supporting a configurational understanding that accounts for institutional interdependence and contextuality. We argue that policy strategies cannot look for overall readiness but should place key institutional strengths relative to local conditions and public value objectives.

This article examines the governance challenges of human genomic data sharing. The analysis builds upon the unique characteristics that distinguish genomic data from other forms of personal data, particularly its dual nature as both uniquely identifiable to individuals and inherently collective, reflecting familial and ethnic group characteristics. This duality informs a tripartite risk taxonomy: individual privacy violations, group-level harms, and bioterrorism threats. Examining regulatory frameworks in the European Union (EU) and China, the article demonstrates how current data protection mechanisms—primarily anonymisation and informed consent—prove inadequate for genomic data governance due to the impossibility of true anonymisation and the limitations of consent-based models in addressing the risks of such sharing. Drawing on the concept of “genomic contextualism,” the article proposes a nuanced framework that incorporates interest balancing, comprehensive data lifecycle management, and tailored technical safeguards. The objective is to protect individuals and underrepresented groups while maximising the scientific and clinical value of genomic data.

This article examines the implications of adopting a socio-technical perspective on the design and implementation of GovTech solutions. To observe the phenomenon, it adopts a case study approach focusing on the WiseTown solution and its City Digital Twin (CDT), developed by the Italian company TeamDev. The article investigates how integrating social factors, such as urban governance, with technical elements, like data analysis and modeling, can enhance the conceptualization, design, and implementation of user-centric, data-driven digital solutions as part of a broader digital transformation strategy. The article explores an Italian best practice that is developing four dimensions of the GovTech socio-technical framework: Governance Structures, Institutional Arrangements, User and Context Understanding, and Technological Development. It critically examines and discusses the challenges and opportunities associated with the adoption of CDTs and their impact on public policy implementation. The analysis is centered on two main aspects that emerged from the case study: data integration and sharing within CDTs, and the social implications associated with data usage for decision-making. Ultimately, the article explores the role of stakeholder collaboration (public-private partnerships) and the creation of innovation ecosystems—GovTech ecosystem in this specific case—to inform and steer policymaking through and beyond the adoption of CDTs.

In many African countries, limited population data pose a challenge for tax administrations struggling with informal economies. This study examines Uganda’s integration of national ID data into tax registration through “Instant TIN,” an interface linking the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) with the National Identification and Registration Agency (NIRA) and the Uganda Registration Service Bureau (URSB). This reform aims to streamline taxpayer registration and improve data quality. Using a mixed-methods approach—combining interviews with government officials and administrative data analysis—we identify three key findings. First, Instant TIN registrants differ significantly from those using the conventional process. They are more likely to be individuals, female, younger, and previously informal, highlighting the reform’s role in bringing in marginalised taxpayers. Second, Instant TIN improves data quality. It reduces TIN duplications for individuals and enhances contact accuracy, decreasing invalid or missing email addresses by eight percentage points and invalid phone numbers by six. However, it worsens sector data quality, increasing missing or incorrect sector information by 12 percentage points. Third, while Instant TIN reduces duplication, manual data entry, and administrative burdens, challenges remain. Infrequent updates in external datasets and a lack of validation within the interface increase administrative costs and complicate taxpayer engagement. Additionally, mandatory in-person updates and invalid contact details add to compliance burdens. Overall, Uganda’s experience highlights both the potential and limitations of integrating national ID data for tax administration, offering insights for other countries considering similar reforms.

Cyber risk is an important consideration in today’s risk management and insurance industries. However, the statistical features of cyber risk, including concerns of solvency for cyber insurance providers, are still emerging. This study investigates the dynamics of ransomware severity, specifically focusing on different statistical dimensions of extortion payments from ransomware attacks across various ransomware strains and/or variants. Our results indicate that extortion payments are not identically distributed across ransomware strains/variants, and thus violate necessary assumptions for solvency determinations using classical ruin theory. These findings emphasize the importance of re-examining these assumptions under empirical data and implementing dynamic cyber risk modelling for portfolio losses from extortion payments from ransomware attacks. Additionally, such findings suggest that removing coverage for extortion payments from insurance policies may protect cyber insurance firms from insolvency, as well as create a potential deterrence effect against ransomware threat actors due to lack of extortion payment from victims. Our work has implications for insurance regulators, policymakers, and national security advisors focused on the financial impact of extortion payments from ransomware attacks.

Societal challenges such as climate change and health inequalities require complex policy decisions, for which governmental organizations rely on a good information position. Having access to data from various domains is seen as a facilitator of making evidence-informed decisions that are more legitimate and less uncertain. To identify and make data available that is stored at various organizations, stakeholders participate in sociotechnical networks, also known as data ecosystems. Data ecosystems aimed at addressing societal challenges are characterized as complex because knowledge about societal issues is uncertain, information is scattered among (governmental) actors, collaboration extends beyond existing organizational networks, and values and interests of network actors can be conflicting. In this translational article, we examine how to successfully establish and maintain data ecosystems aimed at addressing societal challenges, given these complexities. We analyze two cases of successful data ecosystems in the Netherlands and present five narratives about how these data ecosystems navigated these complexities. We find that establishing collaboration among network actors, using bottom-up approaches, contributed to the success of both cases. The cases created structures in which participants were able prioritize the right questions, find common interests, and work together. The narratives present insights for government officials about collaboration in data ecosystems and add to the literature by highlighting the importance of organizational capabilities.

The use of large language models (LLMs) has exploded since November 2022, but there is sparse evidence regarding LLM use in health, medical, and research contexts. We aimed to summarise the current uses of and attitudes towards LLMs across our campus’ clinical, research, and teaching sites. We administered a survey about LLM uses and attitudes. We conducted summary quantitative analysis and inductive qualitative analysis of free text responses. In August–September 2023, we circulated the survey amongst all staff and students across our three campus sites (approximately n = 7500), comprising a paediatric academic hospital, research institute, and paediatric university department. We received 281 anonymous survey responses. We asked about participants’ knowledge of LLMs, their current use of LLMs in professional or learning contexts, and perspectives on possible future uses, opportunities, and risks of LLM use. Over 90% of respondents have heard of LLM tools and about two-thirds have used them in their work on our campus. Respondents reported using LLMs for various uses, including generating or editing text and exploring ideas. Many, but not necessarily all, respondents seem aware of the limitations and potential risks of LLMs, including privacy and security risks. Various respondents expressed enthusiasm about the opportunities of LLM use, including increased efficiency. Our findings show LLM tools are already widely used on our campus. Guidelines and governance are needed to keep up with practice. Insights from this survey were used to develop recommendations for the use of LLMs on our campus.

Quick and accurate forecasts of incidence and mortality trends for the near future are particularly useful for the immediate allocation of available public health resources, as well as for understanding the long-term course of the pandemic. The surveillance data used for predictions, however, may come with some reporting delays. Consequently, auxiliary data sources that are available immediately can provide valuable additional information for recent time periods for which surveillance data have not yet become fully available. In this work, a set of Google search queries by individual users related to COVID-19 incidence and mortality is collected and analyzed. The information from these queries aims to improve quick forecasts. Initially, the identified search query keywords were ranked according to their predictive abilities with reported incidence and mortality. After that, the ARIMA, Prophet, and XGBoost models were fitted to generate forecasts using only the available reported incidence and mortality (baseline model) or together with combinations of searched keywords identified based on their predictive abilities (predictors model). In summary, the inclusion of top-ranked keywords as predictors significantly enhanced prediction accuracy for the majority of scenarios in the range from 50% to 90% across all considered models and is recommended for future use. The inclusion of low-ranked keywords did not provide such an improvement. In general, the ranking of predictors and the corresponding forecast improvements were more pronounced for incidence, while the results were less pronounced for mortality.

The ongoing development of a Swiss Health Data Space (SHDS) presents an opportunity to transform health delivery and care by enabling large-scale secondary health research. The successful implementation of the SHDS depends on its trustworthiness, as public trust is closely linked to public participation in data-sharing initiatives. We conducted four focus groups across the German-, French-, and Italian-speaking regions of Switzerland to identify public expectations and requirements related to the attributes that define a trustworthy SHDS. The participants discussed four fictitious case studies on: (1) consent management; (2) record linkage via the national social security number; (3) national data coordination center; and (4) cross-border data exchange. To best inform Swiss policy, we held a panel discussion with patient experts and healthcare professionals to translate the focus group findings into governance and public communication recommendations. Policy recommendations are proposed based on insights from the fictitious case studies discussed with participants, accompanied by guidance on implementation measures that contribute to proactively building trust in the development of the SHDS. Communication recommendations are further provided, highlighting that the success of the SHDS will depend on early and continuous trustworthy public communication efforts that actively engage the Swiss public, address their concerns, and foster support throughout its development. Overarching these efforts will be a foundational governance approach that meaningfully involves relevant stakeholders and members of the Swiss public, while allocating appropriate responsibility to maintain trustworthiness of the SHDS.

National digital ID apps are increasingly gaining popularity globally. As how we transact in the world is increasingly mediated by the digital, questions need to be asked about how these apps support the inclusion of disabled people. In particular, international instruments, such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, spotlight the need for inclusive information and communication technologies. In this paper, we adopt a critical disability studies lens to analyse the workings of state-designed digital IDs—Singpass app—and what they can tell us about existing ways of designing for digital inclusion. We situate the case of the Singpass app within the rise of global digital transactions and the political-technical infrastructures that shape their accessibility. We analyse the ways Singpass centres disability, the problems it may still entail, and the possible implications for inclusion. At the same time, we uncover the lessons Singpass’s development holds for questions of global digital inclusion.

As digital welfare systems expand in local governments worldwide, understanding their implications is crucial for safeguarding public values like transparency, legitimacy, accountability, and privacy. A lack of political debate on data-driven technologies risks eroding democratic legitimacy by obscuring decision-making and impeding accountability mechanisms. In the Netherlands, political discussions on digital welfare within local governments are surprisingly limited, despite evidence of negative impacts on both frontline professionals and citizens. This study examines what mechanisms explain if and how data-driven technologies in the domain of work and income are politically discussed within the municipal government of a large city in the Netherlands, and its consequences. Using a sequential mixed methods design, combining automated text-analysis software ConText (1.2.0) and text-analysis software Atlas.ti (9), we analyzed documents and video recordings of municipal council and committee meetings from 2016 to 2023. Our results show these discussions are rare in the municipal council, occurring primarily either in reaction to scandals, or in reaction to criticism. Two key discursive factors used to justify limited political discussion are: (1) claims of lacking time and knowledge among council members and aldermen, and (2) distancing responsibility and diffusing accountability. This leads to a ‘content chopping’ mechanism, where issues are chopped into small content pieces, for example technical, ethical, and political aspects, and spreading them into separate documents and discussion arenas. This fragmentation can obscure overall coherence and diffuse critical concerns, potentially leading to harmful effects like dehumanization and stereotyping.