Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T01:24:32.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Hierarchy I: Phrase Structure and Grammatical Functions

from Part I - Configuration and Hierarchy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  aN Invalid Date NaN

Ian Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

This chapter looks at the syntactic, i.e. phrase-structural, definitions of grammatical functions put forward in Chomsky (1965), which we restate using X-bar theory. We then submit these definitions to the ‘relational-grammar critique’, to adopt a term coined by Baker (2001), which suggests not just that Chomsky’s definitions are incorrect, but that something closer to the traditional idea that grammatical functions are primitives of syntactic theory is the right approach. One aspect of this critique is that constituency tests do not give clear results in many languages (English being something of an exception). Instead, we propose that asymmetries in c-command relations can provide us with a more reliable and general guide to constituency, and hence phrase-structural relations. This allows us to maintain a configurational definition of grammatical relations. In the final section of this chapter, we look at a construction which appears to centrally involve grammatical functions: the passive. We will see how the passive can be elegantly and usefully defined in purely phrase-structural terms. The conclusion is that grammatical relations can be reduced to phrase-structural relations, and as such are not primitive elements of syntactic theory. This is an important step in establishing the primacy of configurational, hierarchical, phrase-structural relations.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Continuing Syntax
Hierarchy and Locality
, pp. 29 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Primary Sources

Baker, M. 2001. Phrase structure as a representation of grammatical relations. In Davies, William D. & Dubinsky, Stanley (eds.), Objects and Other Subjects: Grammatical functions, functional categories and configurationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2152.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 6475.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 116.Google Scholar
McCloskey, J. 1997. Subjecthood and Subject Positions. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 197235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Carnie, A. 2013. Syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, Chapters 4, 5, 17.Google Scholar
Freidin, R. 1992. Foundations of Generative Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Guéron, J.. 1999. English Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell, Chapter 4.Google Scholar
Poole, G. 2002. Syntactic Theory. London: Palgrave, Chapter 5.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. 1997. Comparative Syntax, London: Arnold, Chapters 1 and 3.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. 2023. Beginning Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapter 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D. 1977. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–89.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. & Postal, P.. 1983a. Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. In Perlmutter, D. (ed.), Studies in Relational Grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 81128.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. & Postal, P.. 1983b. Towards a universal characterisation of passivisation. In Perlmutter, D. (ed.), Studies in Relational Grammar 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 329.Google Scholar
Akkuş, F., Legate, J., Ringe, D. & Šereikaitė, M.. 2020. On passives. Language 96: 771818.Google Scholar
Baker, M., Johnson, K. & Roberts, I.. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–51.Google Scholar
Bruening, B. 2013. By phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16:141.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00171.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8: 81120.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. 2024. Principles of argument structure: a Merge-based approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/15436.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallulli, D. 2007. Rethinking the passive/anticausative distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 38 (4): 770–80.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×