Part II - Locality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Continuing SyntaxHierarchy and Locality, pp. 195 - 323Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Primary Sources
Huang, C.-T. J. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT; published in 1998 as Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J, Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Yafei, Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 260–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secondary Sources
Corver, N. & Nunes, J. (eds.), 2007. The Copy Theory of Movement. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, J. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Chapter 1.10.7551/mitpress/4241.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I. 2010. Agreement and Head-Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Chapter 1.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzmann, M. 2006. Resumptive Prolepsis: A study in indirect A′-dependencies. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. 1993. Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 103–38.Google Scholar
Munn, A. 1994. A minimalist account of reconstruction asymmetries. In Gonzàlez, Mercè (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 24. Vol. 2. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, 397–410.Google Scholar
Sportiche, D. 2005. Division of labor between Merge and Move: Strict locality of selection and apparent reconstruction paradoxes. MS, UCLA. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000163/current.pdf.Google Scholar
Sportiche, D. 2006. Reconstruction, binding, and scope. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Vol. IV. Oxford: Blackwell, 35–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, W. 2013. Being progressive is just a phase: Dividing the functional hierarchy. PhD dissertation, University of Ghent.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. 2001. What VP-ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In Baltin, M. & Collins, C. (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 439–80.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H. 1995. Verbal morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the minimalist program. In Campos, Hector & Kempchinsky, Paula (eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 251–75.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1969. Guess who? Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 5(1): 252–86.Google Scholar
Thoms, G. 2018. Varieties of English. In van Craenenbroeck, J. & Temmerman, T. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1020–38.Google Scholar
Hankamer, J. & Sag, I.. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.Google Scholar
Van Craenenbroeck, J. & Temmerman, T. (eds.), 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, especially the editors’ Introduction and Chapter 2 by Jason Merchant. Chapters 28–38 present case studies of individual languages, which are of obvious interest if you know or like the relevant languages. See also in particular the chapters on predicate ellipsis (Albrecht & Harwood, Chapter 21) and nominal ellipsis (Saab, Chapter 22).Google Scholar
Barbosa, P. 2019. Pro as a minimal nP: Towards a unified approach to prodrop. Linguistic Inquiry 50: 487–526.Google Scholar
Li, Y.-H. A. 2017. Argument ellipsis and the structures of noun phrases. MS, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Tomioka, S. 2003. The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross-linguistic implications. In Schwabe, Kerstin & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), The Interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted structures. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 321–40.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.