We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In this paper, we study how close the terms of a finite arithmetic progression can get to a perfect square. The answer depends on the initial term, the common difference and the number of terms in the arithmetic progression.
Among the values of a binary quadratic form, there are many twins of fixed distance. This is shown in quantitative form. For quadratic forms of discriminant −4 or 8 a corresponding result is obtained for triplets.
Cassels has described a pairing on the 2-Selmer group of an elliptic curve which shares some properties with the Cassels–Tate pairing. In this article, we prove that the two pairings are the same.
A Lehmer number is a composite positive integer n such that ϕ(n)|n − 1. In this paper, we show that given a positive integer g > 1 there are at most finitely many Lehmer numbers which are repunits in base g and they are all effectively computable. Our method is effective and we illustrate it by showing that there is no such Lehmer number when g ∈ [2, 1000].
We study the elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem over finite extension fields. We show that for any sequences of prime powers (qi)i∈ℕ and natural numbers (ni)i∈ℕ with ni⟶∞ and ni/log (qi)⟶0 for i⟶∞, the elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem restricted to curves over the fields 𝔽qnii can be solved in subexponential expected time (qnii)o(1). We also show that there exists a sequence of prime powers (qi)i∈ℕ such that the problem restricted to curves over 𝔽qi can be solved in an expected time of e𝒪(log (qi)2/3).
In Gun and Ramakrishnan [‘On special values of certain Dirichlet L-functions’, Ramanujan J.15 (2008), 275–280], we gave expressions for the special values of certain Dirichlet L-function in terms of finite sums involving Jacobi symbols. In this note we extend our earlier results by giving similar expressions for two more special values of Dirichlet L-functions, namely L(−1,χm) and L(−2,χ−m′), where m,m′ are square-free integers with m≡1 mod 8 and m′≡3 mod 8 and χD is the Kronecker symbol . As a consequence, using the identities of Cohen [‘Sums involving the values at negative integers of L-functions of quadratic characters’, Math. Ann.217 (1975), 271–285], we also express the finite sums with Jacobi symbols in terms of sums involving divisor functions. Finally, we observe that the proof of Theorem 1.2 in Gun and Ramakrishnan (as above) is a direct consequence of Equation (24) in Gun, Manickam and Ramakrishnan [‘A canonical subspace of modular forms of half-integral weight’, Math. Ann.347 (2010), 899–916].
Erdős and Szekeres [‘Some number theoretic problems on binomial coefficients’, Aust. Math. Soc. Gaz.5 (1978), 97–99] showed that for any four positive integers satisfying m1+m2=n1+n2, the two binomial coefficients (m1+m2)!/m1!m2! and (n1+n2)!/n1!n2! have a common divisor greater than 1. The analogous statement for k-element families of k-nomial coefficients (k>1) was conjectured in 1997 by David Wasserman.
Erdős and Szekeres remark that if m1,m2,n1,n2 as above are all greater than 1, there is probably a lower bound on the common divisor in question which goes to infinity as a function of m1 +m2 .Such a bound is obtained in Section 2.
The remainder of this paper is devoted to proving results that narrow the class of possible counterexamples to Wasserman’s conjecture.
Borel conjectured that all algebraic irrational numbers are normal in base 2. However, very little is known about this problem. We improve the lower bounds for the number of digit changes in the binary expansions of algebraic irrational numbers.
We prove that, under suitable conditions, a Jacobi Poincaré series of exponential type of integer weight and matrix index does not vanish identically. For the classical Jacobi forms, we construct a basis consisting of the ‘first’ few Poincaré series, and also give conditions, both dependent on and independent of the weight, that ensure the nonvanishing of a classical Jacobi Poincaré series. We also obtain a result on the nonvanishing of a Jacobi Poincaré series when an odd prime divides the index.
It is well known that if a convex hyperbolic polygon is constructed as a fundamental domain for a subgroup of SL(2,ℝ), then its translates by the group form a locally finite tessellation and its side-pairing transformations form a system of generators for the group. Such a hyperbolically convex fundamental domain for any discrete subgroup can be obtained by using Dirichlet’s and Ford’s polygon constructions. However, these two results are not well adapted for the actual construction of a hyperbolically convex fundamental domain due to their nature of construction. A third, and most important and practical, method of obtaining a fundamental domain is through the use of a right coset decomposition as described below. If Γ2 is a subgroup of Γ1 such that Γ1=Γ2⋅{L1,L2,…,Lm} and 𝔽 is the closure of a fundamental domain of the bigger group Γ1, then the set is a fundamental domain of Γ2. One can ask at this juncture, is it possible to choose the right coset suitably so that the set ℛ is a convex hyperbolic polygon? We will answer this question affirmatively for Hecke modular groups.
In this paper, we prove some one level density results for the low-lying zeros of families of L-functions. More specifically, the families under consideration are that of L-functions of holomorphic Hecke eigenforms of level 1 and weight k twisted with quadratic Dirichlet characters and that of cubic and quartic Dirichlet L-functions.
For two real characters ψ,ψ′ of conductor dividing 8 define where and the subscript 2 denotes the fact that the Euler factor at 2 has been removed. These double Dirichlet series can be extended to possessing a group of functional equations isomorphic to D12. The convexity bound for Z(s,w;ψ,ψ′) is |sw(s+w)|1/4+ε for ℜs=ℜw=1/2. It is proved that Moreover, the following mean square Lindelöf-type bound holds: for any Y1,Y2≥1.
We set up a formalism of endoscopy for metaplectic groups. By defining a suitable transfer factor, we prove an analogue of the Langlands–Shelstad transfer conjecture for orbital integrals over any local field of characteristic zero, as well as the fundamental lemma for units of the Hecke algebra in the unramified case. This generalizes prior work of Adams and Renard in the real case and serves as a first step in studying the Arthur–Selberg trace formula for metaplectic groups.
We determine the smallest possible canonical height for a non-torsion point P of an elliptic curve E over a function field ℂ(t) of discriminant degree 12n with a 2-torsion point for n=1,2,3, and with a 3-torsion point for n=1,2. For each m=2,3, we parametrize the set of triples (E,P,T) of an elliptic curve E/ℚ with a rational point P and m-torsion point T that satisfy certain integrality conditions by an open subset of ℙ2. We recover explicit equations for all elliptic surfaces (E,P,T)attaining each minimum by locating them as curves in our projective models. We also prove that for n=1,2 , these heights are minimal for elliptic curves over a function field of any genus. In each case, the optimal (E,P,T)are characterized by their patterns of integral points.
We use the theory of Kolyvagin systems to prove (most of) a refined class number formula conjectured by Darmon. We show that, for every odd prime p, each side of Darmon’s conjectured formula (indexed by positive integers n) is ‘almost’ a p-adic Kolyvagin system as n varies. Using the fact that the space of Kolyvagin systems is free of rank one over ℤp, we show that Darmon’s formula for arbitrary n follows from the case n=1, which in turn follows from classical formulas.
Soit A une variété abélienne définie sur un corps de nombres K, le nombre de points de torsion définis sur une extension finie L est borné polynomialement en terme du degré [L : K]. Lorsque A est isogène à un produit de variétés abéliennes simples de type GSp, c'est-à-dire dont le groupe de Mumford–Tate est « générique » (isomorphe au groupe des similitudes symplectiques) et vérifiant la conjecture de Mumford–Tate, nous calculons l'exposant optimal dans cette borne, en terme de la dimension des sous-variétés abéliennes de A. Le résultat est inconditionnel pour un produit de variétés abéliennes simples dont l'anneau d'endomorphismes est ℤ et la dimension n'appartient pas à un ensemble exceptionnel explicite S = {4, 10, 16, 32, …}. Par ailleurs nous prouvons, suivant une stratégie de Serre, que si la conjecture de Mumford–Tate est vraie pour des variétés abéliennes de type GSp, alors la conjecture de Mumford–Tate est vraie pour un produit de telles variétés abéliennes.
In this paper we define a p-adic analogue of the Borel regulator for the K-theory of p-adic fields. The van Est isomorphism in the construction of the classical Borel regulator is replaced by the Lazard isomorphism. The main result relates this p-adic regulator to the Bloch–Kato exponential and the Soulé regulator. On the way we give a new description of the Lazard isomorphism for certain formal groups. We also show that the Soulé regulator is induced by continuous and even analytic classes.
We prove an explicit formula for periods of certain automorphic forms on SO5 × SO4 along the diagonal subgroup SO4 in terms of L-values. Our formula also involves a quantity from the theory of endoscopy, as predicted by the refined Gross–Prasad conjecture.