The central Maya lowlands (CML) display an uncommon demographic history—the absence of a millennial population rebound from its former occupational peak, about 800 CE. Here we postulate why the loss of a well-populated CML during the Late Classic-Terminal Classic periods failed to regain substantial occupation during the subsequent 700-800 years before the Spanish conquest of the Maya realm. Updating the narrative of stressful human-environmental conditions, shifts in trade routes, and long-term paucity of occupation in the CML, we examine push-pull factors that affected Postclassic Maya population geography. These factors include population pressures, environmental hazards, resource conditions, and livelihood standards that existed in the Postclassic Period between northern and coastal lowlands and the CML. The advantages that the CML maintained before Postclassic times, foremost regaining superior environmental conditions for agriculture, were insufficient pull factors given the low levels of push factors in the northern and coastal lowlands. We draw attention to the under-treated problem—the failure of a population rebound in the CML—and encourage improvements in systematic data and analytics to address it, including consideration of non-material, socio-cultural factors.

English employs a variety of comparative formation strategies. Theoretical and corpus-based research has established that their distribution depends on a variety of factors. In this article, we take an experimental approach to test analytic, synthetic and double comparative forms in relation to register in American and British English. We report on a rating study investigating the appropriateness and interpretation in terms of evaluativity of the three comparative forms. Our findings confirm the hypothesis that the comparative variants are not considered equally appropriate, but the effect is not as strong as would be expected under the hypothesis that frequency of occurrence is directly related to linguistic judgments. The analytic and double comparative alternatives exhibit lower appropriateness levels than the synthetic comparative. Analytic and double comparative forms are rated as less appropriate in formal than in informal contexts, which did not show an effect on the synthetic form. Furthermore, the analytic variant shows a different behavior in terms of the interpretation than the other forms in that a stronger effect of evaluativity is detected. Limitations and future directions are discussed. Our study is the first to provide experimental evidence for certain hypotheses emerging from corpus-based research.

The experimentally backed and hitherto overlooked empirical observation of the paper is a contrast among indefinite Positive Polarity Items regarding their possibility of being rescued under certain operators with different rescuing potential. If/surprise/only/don’t think can rescue some-indefinites, suspending their anti-licensing (i.e., their impossibility to occur in the scope of a clausemate negation): while some-pronouns (in English and French) and des-indefinites in French exhibit the expected rescuability, English some-NPs remain unexpectedly degraded. Our account relies on the hypothesis that ‘rescuing’ is due to sentential negation being interpreted as ‘external’ (vs. nullified as in most literature). The definition we propose for external negation is syntactic: rescuing operators allow sentential negation to raise to an illocutionary functional projection above Tense Phrase (TP). Thus at LF (Logical Form), the negation takes that higher projection (rather than TP) as complement and becomes harmless for some-indefinites. The semantic correlate of this syntactic proposal is the interpretation of external negation as a propositional operator. As it involves the illocutionary periphery, rescuing is pragmatic in nature. The different rescuing potential between some-pronouns and some-NPs arises from the interplay between their distinct LF-representations and a minimal-event pragmatic constraint on rescuing.

The silent patent ductus arteriosus is currently considered a benign lesion with some practitioners dismissing these patients from cardiac follow-up. We present a 5-year-old male with no known cardiac history who presented with endarteritis in a silent patent ductus arteriosus and underwent successful antibiotic treatment and transcatheter device occlusion.

This article examines the place of colonial Jews and Judaism in the Protestant imagination through the history of Hebrew printing in early America. While scholarship in Christian Hebraism has emphasized points of commonality and interreligious dialogue through shared texts between Judaism and Christianity, this study explores treatments of Hebrew that foreclosed collaboration and conversation between the two groups. The essay offers the term “Protestant Hebrew” to describe how colonial Anglo-American Protestants performed Hebrew to support ministerial authority and to imagine a receptive English-speaking captive Jewish audience for their works. In contrast, diasporic Sephardic Jews treated Hebrew as a necessary instrument for sustaining identity and communication networks across the Atlantic. This disparity was most evident through the publishing culture around Hebrew text types. Colonial printing presses carried just enough Hebrew type for Protestant productions to occasionally adorn their text with Hebrew characters, but never enough to treat it as its own language. Limited types would become a point of frustration for Jewish and Protestant authors who had to rely on printers overseas or on manuscript circulation to publish in Hebrew to a wider audience. Protestant Hebrew demonstrates how the constraints of Anglo-Protestant culture could materialize through the very mechanisms of colonial publishing.

For American archaeology, ceramic styles have historically played a key role in assigning different regional and temporal cultural traditions. San Francisco is one of the earliest pottery styles in northwestern Argentina (NOA; 2000-1500 BP) and has been considered a chronological marker, as it laid the foundation for the development of other ceramic traditions in the NOA region during the Formative period. It is characterized by polished incised gray pieces, bichrome designs, and zooanthropomorphic or anthropomorphic pipes. Regarding the discovery of San Francisco pottery beyond what is considered its core area—the valley of the same name in the eastern part of Jujuy Province—various interpretations have been proposed over the past three decades. These range from the effective occupation of new territories to the exchange, circulation, or imitation of vessels. Based on the composition of ceramic pastes, this research suggests the existence of specific recipes, allowing for the identification of potential local productions and testing hypotheses about the circulation or non local production of San Francisco pottery. Furthermore, the frequent incorporation of grog (chamote) into the fabric is highlighted, reflecting a cohesive manufacturing tradition that persisted over the centuries.