Individuals differ in a range of processes related to reading comprehension, including working memory capacity, decoding skills, inference making and main idea identification. In this exploratory study, we examined evoked potential N400 amplitude during reading comprehension tasks and focused on identifying the main idea in the text, modulated by working memory capacity. Participants included monolinguals or bilinguals who were either typical readers (n = 33) or had been diagnosed with dyslexia (n = 19). Analyses revealed significant group differences for main idea conditions. Participants with dyslexia showed greater N400 amplitude than typical readers, particularly in the right hemisphere, when the main idea was in the last position in the paragraph. There were no significant differences in performance between bilinguals and monolinguals, which does not support the idea of a cognitive advantage for bilingualism. It was noteworthy that, if they had dyslexia, they were similarly negatively impacted by their reading disability. Findings highlight the processing advantages typical readers have relative to dyslexia.

The overturning of the landmark Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade (1973) in the United States during the summer of 2022 with Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization eliminated the nearly 50-year constitutional right to abortion, leading to the introduction of numerous new restrictions. This article examines how the language used in federally proposed anti-abortion legislation has evolved in the aftermath of the Roe decision. By exploring the gender and power dynamics that shape the contemporary abortion debate, alongside feminist legal theory, this study analyzes the language and effects of five bills that have been introduced since the ruling. After analyzing the proposed bills, there was a noticeable shift in anti-abortion strategies by Republican elected officials. Rather than directly criminalizing pregnant individuals, these bills target abortion providers, state funding, and the dissemination of information. This indirect approach sets to restrict abortion access by making it practically unattainable for many regardless of its legality.

We define two types of the α-Farey maps Fα and $F_{\alpha, \flat}$ for $0 \lt \alpha \lt \tfrac{1}{2}$, which were previously defined only for $\tfrac{1}{2} \le \alpha \le 1$ by Natsui (2004). Then, for each $0 \lt \alpha \lt \tfrac{1}{2}$, we construct the natural extension maps on the plane and show that the natural extension of $F_{\alpha, \flat}$ is metrically isomorphic to the natural extension of the original Farey map. As an application, we show that the set of normal numbers associated with α-continued fractions does not vary by the choice of α, $0 \lt \alpha \lt 1$. This extends the result by Kraaikamp and Nakada (2000).

In this study, we present data from two experiments investigating the effect of prosodic focus marking on German L1 and L2 speakers’ interpretation of pronouns. Experiment 1 tested L2 speakers’ interpretation of personal and demonstrative subject pronouns. Experiment 2 examined L1 and L2 speakers’ interpretation of unaccented and accented personal subject and object pronouns. The results of experiment 1 reveal that L2 speakers are sensitive to the different functions of the two subject pronouns. However, grammatical role and focus marking influenced referential choice to similar degrees for both pronouns, suggesting that L2 speakers’ weighting of these linguistic factors differs from that of L1 speakers. Experiment 2 showed L1 and L2 speakers to prefer the subject referent for both subject and object pronouns. Referent preference reversal is only observed with the accented subject pronoun in L1 speakers. Ultimately, this study emphasizes the varying levels of sensitivity to grammatical role and information structure observed not only for the different pronoun types but also among different speaker groups.

By 2050, 1.31 billion people will be living with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Those with social disadvantage experience greater diabetes prevalence, morbidity and mortality. Gestational diabetes (GDM) is an established factor for T2DM, with 3–4 times greater risks among women who are Black, Hispanic and South and South East Asians. Lifestyle interventions that include diet and physical activity reduce T2DM in at-risk populations, including women with prior GDM, regardless of ethnicity. However, migrant women from non-Western backgrounds are less likely to engage with the programme despite its efficacy. This review paper aims to describe the social disparities in GDM globally, with a focus on equity issues and interventions in Australia. It outlines a five-part approach to solutions that move us towards equity in reach and uptake for women from non-Western migrant backgrounds in Australia. Culturally inclusive solutions start with evaluating reach in underserved groups through equity audits or stratified analyses and identifying groups where reach is low. Community partnerships can then be formed with key actors across health and social sectors identified through stakeholder mapping. Effective reach strategies, including implementation and evaluation plans, will be co-developed through these partnerships, addressing risk factors, enablers and barriers to a healthy lifestyle. Solutions that integrate medical and social services, such as social prescribing, could facilitate healthy lifestyle choices through restructuring the social environment of the individual. These steps lead to interventions that promote social cohesion and resilience, enabling individuals to attain health and well-being in the face of external challenges.

Led by national policy, standardisation has enhanced hospital discharge communication to primary care over recent decades. However, discharge summary content standards and their corresponding templates can be over-relied on by authors, risking the exclusion of important contextual and explanatory information for patients with more complex care.

This information can be critical for GPs to deliver high quality, safe, and efficient post-discharge care, especially for this patient cohort which can be at higher risk of avoidable harm from suboptimal communication. Discharge summary authors can lack sufficient understanding of the recipient primary care perspective to mitigate this issue and communicate effectively through standardised letter templates. Strengthening this interprofessional understanding is an essential next step to improve discharge communication.

In response to this challenge, we propose the basis of a new framework of interprofessional discharge communication that accounts for the different paradigms of specialism and generalism and supports summary authors to tailor their content to the patient’s post-discharge care.

We call for the co-development of this framework through a programme of applied research, alongside the exploration of primary–secondary care interface learning communities as a vehicle for interprofessional education. These initiatives can serve to augment the current strengths of standardised discharge summaries and mitigate their limitations, maximising the quality, safety, and efficiency of post-discharge care. Progress in this field can benefit wider cross-interface communications and practice and assist the NHS integration agenda.

In maximum likelihood factor analysis, we need to solve a complicated system of algebraic equations, known as the normal equation, to get maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs). Since this equation is difficult to solve analytically, its solutions are typically computed with continuous optimization methods, such as the Newton–Raphson method. With this procedure, however, the MLEs are dependent on initial values since the log-likelihood function is highly non-concave. Particularly, the estimates of unique variances can result in zero or negative, referred to as improper solutions; in this case, the MLE can be severely unstable. To delve into the issue of the instability, we algebraically compute all candidates for the MLE. We provide an algorithm based on algebraic computations that is carefully designed for maximum likelihood factor analysis. To be specific, Gröbner bases are employed, powerful tools to get simplified sub-problems for given systems of algebraic equations. Our algebraic algorithm provides the MLE independent of the initial values. While computationally demanding, our algebraic approach is applicable to small-scale problems and provides valuable insights into the characterization of improper solutions. For larger-scale problems, we provide numerical methods as practical alternatives to the algebraic approach. We perform numerical experiments to investigate the characteristics of the MLE with our two approaches.

It is well understood that safeguarding confidentiality is paramount to ensuring the success of research and the protection of participations. However, professional responsibilities and ethics of care can, at times, manifest in a requirement, or even a desire, to breach promises of confidentiality. We unpack this tension by drawing on research on the concepts of legal privilege, the right to report and the duty to report, the impacts of disclosures, as well as a study conducted with socio-legal and criminological researchers and criminalized or socially sanctioned communities who have participated in qualitative a research project. Our findings illustrate that while researchers with a clinical designation (e.g., nurses and social workers), enjoy clarity on professional duties, for researchers without such professional policies (e.g., criminologists) there is little guidance on when and how disclosures could and should take place. That said, when faced with the potential of actual and imminent threats of harm to an identifiable person, most researchers align with Supreme Court of Canada guidance, and would consider reporting, but with much deliberation regarding what constitutes harm, to whom one should report, and the consequences of disclosures. In the interests of contributing to this conversation, we conclude this paper with a decision-making framework that puts the Wigmore test into conversation with the Supreme Court of Canada’s 1999 Smith v Jones decision.

Do oral arguments influence state supreme courts, and if so, how? Focusing on a “thinking-fast” framework, this study analyzes 2014–2021 New York Court of Appeals oral arguments to test whether non-traditional factors such as expressed emotion can shape decisions. Empirical analysis drawn from textual data shows that oral arguments can explain decision-making, and that justices’ emotion during arguments likely plays a role. The findings challenge normatively rational models of judicial behavior by underscoring affective, real-time influences and highlight oral arguments as a consequential stage in subnational adjudication. This is the first evidence of their meaningful role in state supreme courts.

Earthworms are postdispersal seed predators that can influence weed communities in temperate agroecosystems. Recent studies have found that seed feeding by earthworms tends to be driven by the active selection of certain seed species rather than random encounter. Numerous seed traits are expected to affect seed selection by earthworms, including seed size, shape, coat hardness, and nutritional content. The impact of these traits on seed selection by earthworms tends to vary depending on seed species identity and earthworm species identity, rendering the outcome of earthworm–seed interactions hard to predict. We carried out laboratory experiments to investigate the impact of seed physical and chemical traits on seed choice by the common earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris). Seeds of six weed species typical of the Northern Great Plains agroecosystem, wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.), field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.), shepherd’s purse [Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.], catchweed bedstraw (Galium aparine L.), green foxtail [Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv.], and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), were offered to L. terrestris in multiple-choice feeding arenas. The results showed that seeds of S. arvensis and C. bursa-pastoris, both of which have high lipid content, were the most consumed. Seed ingestion was negatively influenced by irregular seed shapes and long seed length, but these physical traits did not override the strong preference for lipid-rich seeds. These findings suggest that seed selection by L. terrestris earthworms was strongly influenced by the lipid content of the seed when seed morphology (i.e., size and shape) varied within certain limits. Therefore, seed nutrients are likely to play an important role in weed seed choice by L. terrestris earthworms when seed physical traits do not impose major constraints on ingestion.

We prove motivic versions of mass formulas by Krasner, Serre, and Bhargava concerning (weighted) counts of extensions of local fields.

Program equivalence checking is the task of confirming that two programs have the same behavior on corresponding inputs. We develop a calculus based on symbolic execution and coinduction to check the equivalence of programs in a non-strict functional language. Additionally, we show that our calculus can be used to derive counterexamples for pairs of inequivalent programs, including counterexamples that arise from non-termination. We describe a fully automated approach for finding both equivalence proofs and counterexamples. Our implementation, nebula, proves equivalences of programs written in Haskell. We demonstrate nebula’s practical effectiveness at both proving equivalence and producing counterexamples automatically by applying nebula to existing benchmark properties.