To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This article examines the Puerto Rican legal mobilisations for the right to access public information through the lenses of activist-scholarship. Based on ethnographic research with Puerto Rican scholars, lawyers and civil society organisations, the article explores how they have used the legal system to demand greater transparency and accountability from the Puerto Rican government and the Federal Oversight and Management Board (FOMB). First, it engages with the efforts of Proyecto de Acceso a la Información, a law clinic and civil society organisation initiative aimed at securing access to public information, transparency and accountability in government. Second, it reflects on Sembrando Sentido’s efforts, an anti-corruption and transparency civil society organisation, to draft and enact a series of anti-corruption laws. These case studies illustrate how activist-scholarship shapes Puerto Rican society by using legal tools to challenge colonial legality and resist the imposition of neoliberal policies that exacerbate inequality and corruption.
The goal of this chapter is to introduce the concepts of Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. It begins with a discussion of the American Dream, the notion that the US is a land of opportunity, equality, and the rule of law, and that anyone can be successful if they work hard. This notion of the American Dream is challenged by evidence and discussed from the perspective of Naima Coster, a Black Latina award-winning author. The chapter reviews some characteristics of minoritized communities in the US, how they experience discrimination and barriers to achieve the dream, and some popular myths about racial/gender progress. The chapter defines Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, issues at the heart of demands to make the dream true. Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion represent a growing field of research, a set of initiatives, and social movements to rethink power asymmetries, how resources and opportunities are distributed, and why social hierarchies are maintained. The chapter includes a Food for Thought section on college student debt and the cycle of poverty. It ends with a discussion of Naima Coster, tokenism, and the need for structural change.
The end of the American Revolution energised concerns about the political, economic, and moral state of an empire that had become inextricable from the plantation economy and the transatlantic trafficking of enslaved Africans. Intent on forging an empire without slave-trading, some Cambridge students and fellows took a leading role in attacking the slave economy, enslavers, and the consumption and production of goods tied to the plantation economy. Other past and present Cambridge fellows, however, were emboldened by defeat in the Revolution to support enslavers, arguing that enslavement was the principal foundation of Britain’s rapidly growing economy and should remain entrenched in the British Caribbean. The problem of the slave trade was particularly evident in Britons’ engagement with West Africa, where antislavery activists, colonisers, and explorers had to negotiate and collaborate with local slave-traders and imperial companies to achieve their aims. These conflicts reveal the challenges and limitations of idealism when confronted with the realities of Britain’s slave empire.
Can political activism foster electoral participation? We investigate this question by examining the role of the British suffragists in fostering women’s electoral participation. While scholars have shown that women politicians increase women’s participation in politics, less attention has been paid to the role of activists. We fill this gap by studying the 1913 Pilgrimage, a large-scale nationwide march in support of women’s parliamentary suffrage. Using a novel database of geocoded electoral registers, we employ a differences-in-differences strategy to show that proximity to the Pilgrimage increased women’s registration in local elections. To explain this effect, we show that exposure to women activists spurred other women’s political mobilization, and that our results are not driven by an endogenous selection of the march path and cannot be attributed to mobilization by other movements or politicians. Our findings highlight that women’s activism can drive political participation even in the virtual absence of women politicians.
The rise of the knowledge economy draws workers towards concentrated skill clusters and creates political conflicts between urban high-opportunity areas and rural and suburban areas of lower dynamism. We advance the existing literature with a dynamic perspective by studying the political consequences of a structural pull into destinations that are typically more progressive than the places of origin. We create an innovative, multidimensional ‘opportunity map’ at the NUTS-3 level in Germany and merge this novel index with individual-level panel data to assess the political implications of residential relocation. Our findings consistently show that moving to opportunity results in stronger political integration, more left-leaning self-identification, and lower support for far-right parties. This article therefore underscores the role of structural change and internal migration in shaping political polarization: while economically motivated relocations to opportunity-rich destinations create significant progressive potential in knowledge hubs, the ongoing pull into thriving areas exacerbates resentments in low-opportunity places.
The goal of this chapter is to introduce anti-Asian racism and the COVID-19 pandemic. It begins with the story of Kristina Arevalo, an Asian American scholar pursuing a PhD in developmental psychology in New York City who experienced racial discrimination during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is consistent with the history of racial scapegoating in the US, a strategy of blaming Asian Americans for health and economic crises, as well as wars, that relies on fear and hate to justify violence against them. This chapter is informed by Asian critical race theory (AsianCrit), discusses who are Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders, some popular myths about them, and their place in a racial position model. It examines how anti-Asian racism is supported by the model minority myth, the Yellow Peril racist trope, the perpetual foreigner stereotype, and Orientalism. The chapter includes a Food for Thought section on the Delano grape strike and linked fate. It ends with a discussion of Kristina Arevalo and rethinking who is considered a “Real American.”
The goal of this chapter is to introduce xenophobia against Latinx immigrants. It begins with the story of Carlos Gregorio Hernández Vásquez, a boy from an Indigenous Maya village in Guatemala, an exceptional student who migrated to the US with his sister, was separated from her, and died in custody of US Border Patrol in 2019. The story of family separation of Carlos illustrates anti-immigration policies and xenophobia against asylum seekers, refugees, and undocumented immigrants in the US. Informed by Latinx critical race theory (LatCrit), this chapter discusses who are Latinx people, some popular myths about them, and how they are treated in the US under laws such as Arizona SB 1070 that criminalized undocumented immigrants. It examines the differences between internal and international migration, voluntary and involuntary migration, and emigration and immigration. The chapter includes a Food for Thought section on 9/11, the War on Terror, and Islamophobia. It ends with a discussion of Carlos Hernández and the need for immigration reform.
We develop a new scaling theory for the resistive tearing mode instability of a current sheet with a strong shear flow across the layer. The growth rate decreases with increasing flow shear and is completely stabilized as the shear flow becomes Alfvénic: both in the constant-$\varPsi$ regime, as in previous results, but we also show that the growth rate is in fact suppressed more strongly in the nonconstant-$\varPsi$ regime. As a consequence, for sufficiently large flow shear, the maximum of the growth rate is always affected by the shear suppression, and the wavenumber at which this maximum growth rate is attained is an increasing function of the strength of the flow shear. These results may be important for the onset of reconnection in imbalanced MHD turbulence.
Recently introduced parasites are predicted to cause more severe infections because of a lack of host-parasite co-evolution. When new parasites co-occur with similar parasites they may compete for resources within a host, with mixed species infections potentially resulting in antagonistic, synergistic or additive effects. We tested Ostrea chilensis flat oysters in New Zealand for infections by two species of haplosporidian oyster parasites. Bonamia exitiosa is an endemic parasite to New Zealand, whereas Bonamia ostreae is an introduced species first detected in New Zealand in 2015. We investigated the infection intensity of each parasite by estimating gene copy numbers using species-specific digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) across Bonamia spp. allopatric and sympatric ranges. Our results showed that B. ostreae had significantly higher gene copy numbers than B. exitiosa. However, concurrent infections of both Bonamia parasites had similar intensities (based on gene copy number) to single-species infections, with no detectable interactive effects. Collectively, the results indicate that B. ostreae remains a significant risk to O. chilensis, although coinfections may not exacerbate disease. This study demonstrates the value of ddPCR screening and the importance of considering evolutionary ecology in the management of commercially important marine diseases.
How does the form of community dissent shape public support for coercive state policies? This article addresses this question through a vignette experiment on coca forced eradication in Colombia. Participants were randomly assigned to scenarios in which communities either verbally objected to or mobilized against coercive eradication efforts. Exposure to mobilization, compared to verbal objection, reduces support for both unconditional eradication and outright opposition. By contrast, it increases support for eradication conditioned on community consent. These effects are consistent across racial frames, suggesting that the impact of dissent form may transcend ethnic boundaries. We interpret these findings as evidence that visible, organized community dissent can shift public preferences toward more community-centered and conditional approaches. These findings contribute to research on protest, state coercion, and public opinion by showing that the form of dissent shapes support for coercive state interventions.
Suicide and self-harm in people with depression are major public health concerns; electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a treatment recommended in UK clinical guidelines for severe mood disorders. We aimed to investigate published literature on the effect of ECT on the incidence of suicide, self-harm, and the recorded presence of suicidal thoughts (suicide-related outcomes). We hypothesized that ECT would be associated with a reduced incidence of suicide-related outcomes and all-cause mortality. We reviewed systematically all eligible studies as specified in our protocol (PROSPERO 293393). We included studies that compared ECT against a comparator treatment, and which included suicide-related outcomes or mortality. We searched Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO on January 24, 2022, updated to February 12, 2025. We identified 12,313 records and, after deduplication, screened 8,281 records on title and abstract and 212 on full-text, identifying 17 eligible studies. Studies showed significant heterogeneity in methodology, outcomes, time points chosen, and study populations. Three included studies investigated change in the suicidality domain on psychological rating scales: two showed a reduction in the ECT group; the other was underpowered for this outcome. Meta-analysis of suicide outcomes showed significant statistical heterogeneity and did not detect differences in a consistent direction. Meta-analysis of other mortality outcomes showed reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality (log relative risk [logRR]: −0.29; 95% CI: −0.53, −0.05) and non-suicide mortality (logRR: −0.21; 95% CI: −0.35, −0.07). Further high-quality studies are needed, which should seek to minimize biases (particularly confounding by indication) and report a wider range of suicide-related outcomes.
The goal of this chapter is to introduce accessibility, democracy, and the need to confront ableism. It begins with the story of Alice Wong, an Asian American disabled activist and bestselling author who wrote about the barriers to vote faced by People with Dis/abilities like her during the COVID-19 pandemic. The story of Alice illustrates the challenges with voting in the US, a country that is now considered a flawed democracy and facing many institutional barriers, including voter suppression laws. Informed by dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit), this chapter examines who are People with Dis/abilities, some popular myths about them, and how they are treated in the US when it comes to voting. Ableism, a system that treasures able-bodiedness and imposes it as the norm in society, is discussed as harmful to US democracy. To confront ableism and improve democracy we need accessibility, satisfying needs to allow full participation in a space or action. The chapter includes a Food for Thought section on interdependence and solidarity, from San Francisco to Gaza. It ends with a discussion of Alice Wong and the disability justice movement.