To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The chapter gives a brief outline of a variety of random processes associated with networks. It begins with a short introduction to properties of finite Markov chains, including an ergodic theorem and the notion of reversibility, that are useful for understanding networks. Next, the simple vertex random walk is discussed, together with the random walk with restart. The non-backtracking random walk is also introduced, as are some random walks on sets of networks, such as the switching chain and Glauber dynamics. The chapter concludes with a discussion of epidemic models, and of some dynamical systems, such as opinion formation models, on networks.
Data sets that illustrate the methods developed in the book are introduced in this chapter. These are the Florentine marriage networks, Zachary’s karate club network, protein–protein interaction data, collaboration networks, gene co-expression networks, Sampson’s monastery networks, Krackhardt’s manager friendship networks, trade networks, Adamic and Glance’s political blog network and the World Wide Web. Networks encountered in practice are usually derived from larger, more comprehensive collections of data and ways of constructing a network from such data are also discussed.
Stein’s method for distributional approximation was originally developed in the context of normal approximation. It is appropriate for use with network statistics, such as subgraph counts, when the typical counts are large; (compound) Poisson approximation is most useful in sparse networks, normal approximation when networks are denser. In this chapter, Stein’s method for estimating the error in normal approximation, measured with respect to the bounded Wasserstein distance, is outlined. A Stein equation, a first-order ordinary differential equation is derived, and some properties of its solutions are established. Direct application of these results leads to a general bound on the approximation error, which is then applied in the classical context of sums of independent random variables. Then, both local and size bias coupling approaches are developed. The local approach, which uses a double decomposition, is illustrated by application to the number of triangles in the Bernoulli random graph; the calculations are typically more involved than for Poisson approximation. The coupling approach is applied to the distribution of the sample mean in simple random sampling.
The introduction outlines the problems involved in coming to grips with data in the form of a network. A complete pictorial description is possible only for very small networks. More commonly, it is necessary to describe a network in other ways, by choosing appropriate summary statistics, and by comparing it to other, better-understood networks. In many cases, the entire network may be unknown and may change over time, so that only network samples are available for analysis. Problems of interest include conducting statistical analyses when observations are taken from individuals linked by a network, finding communities within a network, estimating how fast an epidemic on a network may be transmitted; and judging to what extent the specification of a network may be in error.
The random geometric graphs considered in this chapter are derived from a configuration of points that are independently placed in an underlying Euclidean space, according to some distribution. Each pair of points that are separated by a distance less than some given threshold is joined by an edge, and the graph then consists only of vertices, corresponding to the points, and of the edges between them, with the positional information discarded. In this model, the edges are no longer independent, and the neighbourhood structure is quite different from the tree-like neighbourhoods in Chapters 11–14; for instance, the average local clustering coefficient is not typically close to zero, even in sparse graphs. A giant component is shown to be unlikely to exist if the density of points is low enough, and to be almost certain to exist if the density of points is high enough, with the ratio of the critical densities fixed as the number of points grows. A subgraph threshold theorem is established, complemented by a number of distributional approximations to the counts of subgraphs; the independence of the positions of the underlying points simplifies this discussion. Under suitable asymptotics, typical shortest path lengths are shown to grow like a power of the number of points, rather than logarithmically, as was the case for the models in Chapters 11–14.
It is possible to define limiting objects that can approximate dense networks, as the number of vertices tend to infinity, in much the same way that the normal distribution approximates that of a sum of independent random variables. In this way, properties of dense graphs can be approximated by those of a suitably chosen limit. A network on n vertices is associated, via its adjacency matrix, with a symmetric function on the unit square that takes values of either 0 or 1, constant over squares of side 1/n, unique up to permutation of the vertex labels. This representation of a network belongs to the larger space of equivalence classes of symmetric, measurable functions on the unit square taking values in the unit interval, with two functions equivalent if one can be obtained from the other by a measure-preserving transformation of the axes; the equivalence classes are called graphons. A metric is defined on the space of graphons with the property that a sequence of ever larger dense networks converges, with respect to this metric, to a limiting graphon W, if, for each k, the distribution, over the set of possible subgraphs of size k, of a randomly chosen induced subgraph of size k in the network converges to a corresponding distribution derived from W.
For the distribution of a count to be close to a Poisson distribution, the events that are counted should typically be almost independent of one another. When counting the number of copies of a small subgraph in a network, it is often the case that the presence of one copy makes it much more likely that other copies share some of the same edges. If this is so, there is a tendency for the copies to occur in clumps. It may well be that the number of clumps has an approximately Poisson distribution, but that the number of copies has a distribution more like that of a sum of a Poisson number of independent random variables, a compound Poisson distribution. Approximation by compound Poisson distributions can also be quantified using Stein’s method. In this chapter, a Stein equation is derived, together with a general estimate of error that is based on it. A local approach is then developed and illustrated using the number of `triangle and whisker’ graphs in the Bernoulli random graph. Another natural question is to address the joint distribution of the counts of a number of different subgraphs in a network. This can be tackled using Stein’s method for Poisson process approximation. The local and coupling approaches to Poisson process approximation are presented and are used in the multivariate context to approximate the joint distribution of short cycles in the Bernoulli random graph.
The structure to be expected in the immediate neighbourhood of a given vertex, in many of the most widely used models of networks, can be matched to that of a suitably chosen branching process. An example of the geometric growth typical of a branching process is furnished by the early stages of the spread of an epidemic disease, as evidenced in the COVID-19 pandemic. The Bernoulli random graph, in turn, can be interpreted as being formally equivalent to the well-established Reed–Frost epidemic model, and the growth of an epidemic more generally can be related to the underlying network of contacts between individuals. In this chapter, branching processes in discrete time are introduced, and their basic properties established. For the Bienaymé–Galton–Watson’ process, moment formulae, the criticality theorem, the distribution of the total population size (in the sub-critical and critical cases) and the asymptotically geometric growth (in the super-critical case) are addressed. In the multitype analogue of the Bienaymé–Galton–Watson’ process, the convergence of the type distribution in the super-critical case is also presented.
We show that there exist constants $\delta _1,\delta _2\gt 0$ such that if $G$ is an $(n,d,\lambda )$-graph with $\lambda /d\le \delta _1$, then $G$ contains an induced cycle of length at least $\delta _2n/d$. We further demonstrate that, up to a constant factor, this is best possible. Utilising our techniques, we derive that the number of non-isomorphic induced subgraphs of such $G$ is at least exponential in $n\log d/d$, and further demonstrate that this is tight up to a constant factor in the exponent.
The Chung–Lu network model is a multiplicative vertex weighted model, analogous to the Erdős–Rényi mixture model, in which the weights of the vertices may take arbitrary positive values. If the weights are restricted to being drawn from a fixed, finite set, the model is precisely equivalent to an Erdős–Rényi mixture model. Having arbitrary choices of weights allows rather general distributions for the number of neighbours of a vertex. In the Bernoulli random graph, this distribution is constrained to being close to Poisson, and, in particular, cannot have long tails, which makes unlikely that occasional vertices have very large numbers of neighbours, as is often observed in practice. The generality of the possible choices of weights makes the arguments more difficult than for Bernoulli models, since the approximation of the neighbourhoods is no longer as accurate. Despite this, it is possible to match the distribution of local neighbourhoods to those of a suitably chosen branching process, to prove a threshold theorem for the existence of a giant component and a subgraph threshold theorem for the numbers of small subgraphs, and to approximate the distribution of the shortest path length between two vertices having particular weights.
The small world networks considered in this chapter were originally designed to provide examples of networks whose clustering coefficient is not small (as is the case in locally tree-like networks), but in which shortest path lengths grow only logarithmically with the number of vertices if the expected degree of a typical vertex remains bounded (unlike what happens in random geometric graphs). These small world networks can be thought of as interpolating between the Bernoulli random graph and random geometric graphs, by superimposing one upon the other, thus reducing the shortest path lengths without greatly reducing the clustering coefficient. In a limiting version, in which random shortcuts are superimposed on a circle, it is shown that shortest path lengths between randomly chosen points of the circle are divided by a quantity roughly equal to the reciprocal of the number of shortcuts.
Long-term unemployment (LTU) is a challenge for both jobseekers and public employment services. Statistical profiling tools are increasingly used to predict LTU risk. Some profiling tools are opaque, black-box machine learning (ML) models, which raise issues of transparency and fairness. The present paper investigates whether interpretable models could serve as an alternative, using administrative data from Switzerland. Traditional statistical, interpretable, and black-box models are compared in terms of predictive performance, interpretability, and fairness. It is shown that explainable boosting machines, a recent interpretable model, perform nearly as well as the best black-box models. It is also shown how model sparsity, feature smoothing, and fairness mitigation can enhance transparency and fairness with only minor losses in performance. These findings suggest that interpretable profiling provides an accountable and trustworthy alternative to black-box models without compromising performance.
Spatial risk models for Lassa fever (LF) generally predict the primary reservoir, Mastomys natalensis, is restricted to rural landscapes. This study integrates multispecies biotic interactions and anthropogenic land-use into a high-resolution framework to evaluate LF’s urban potential. I implemented an integrated multispecies occupancy model to reconstruct the reservoir’s realized niche, accounting for sampling bias and invasive rodent competitors. A socio-economic filter, proxied by night-time lights, was introduced to model the dampening effect of urban infrastructure on spillover. Annual infections were estimated using a demographic compartmental model incorporating empirical seroreversion rates. Results indicate high biological hazard across the peri-urban fringes of major West African cities. However, an infrastructure-driven socio-economic shield decouples this hazard from human incidence in dense urban cores. Accounting for spatial shielding and antibody waning yields an estimated 2.6 million annual Lassa virus infections. Comparing predictions to clinical data reveals substantial surveillance gaps, identifying highly suitable silent districts in Nigeria, Benin, and Togo with zero reported cases. LF possesses the biological potential to become a peri-urban disease; addressing these surveillance gaps at the peri-urban interface is a critical public health priority.
Acute otitis media (AOM) is a major driver of paediatric antibiotic prescriptions. We assessed the impact of oral and topical antibiotics on middle ear, nasopharyngeal, and gut microbiome compositions, and the gut resistome, in children with AOM and ear discharge (AOMd). Fifty-eight children with AOMd and ear pain and/or fever were randomized to oral amoxicillin suspension (n = 31) or hydrocortisone-bacitracin-colistin eardrops (n = 27) for 7 days. From 57 out of 58 children, baseline, and Week-2 middle ear fluid (MEF) and nasopharyngeal (NP) samples were sequenced, along with baseline, Week-2, and Month-3 faecal samples. At baseline, the top 5 MEF genera were Streptococcus, Haemophilus, Turicella, Staphylococcus and Alloiococcus and NP genera Moraxella, Haemophilus, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and Dolosigranulum. At Week-2, the ear discharge had resolved in all but four children (oral n = 3, eardrops n = 1). In NP samples, the relative and absolute abundances of Streptococcus decreased to a greater extent after oral than eardrop treatment, but Moraxella and Haemophilus increased only following oral treatment. Neither treatment significantly altered the faecal microbiome or resistome at Week-2 and Month-3. Therefore, both treatments resolved the middle ear discharge in most children, but oral amoxicillin suspension may reduce NP Streptococcus more than hydrocortisone-bacitracin-colistin eardrops at the cost of potentially increasing other NP pathobionts.
Social network experiments provide a powerful framework for identifying causal network effects but also allow a specific form of network endogeneity. Random assignment eliminates the correlation between individual differences and treatment assignment but not between individual differences and treatment response. Individual differences can shape how participants enact their assigned networks. We use data from three networks to demonstrate an underappreciated approach for estimating causal network effects in the presence of endogeneity. The pre-experiment network captures individual differences, the treatment network defines the assigned structure, and the behavioral network reflects the interactions that occur during the experiment. Because the treatment network is exogenously assigned, it can serve as an instrument for the behavioral network, isolating the causal component of behavioral network effects. Using data from a coordination experiment, we estimate the causal effect of brokerage in the behavioral network on an important team outcome: perceived leadership. We also examine the influence of pre-experiment networks, finding that individuals who enter with closed networks sometimes emerge as brokers. The result shows that behavioral networks form through interdependent choices and interactions among multiple individuals and that endogenous network structures can generate effects beyond the control or intentions of any single individual.