This chapter introduces the canonical crisis bargaining model. Two states negotiate over a zero-sum good. If they fail to reach an agreement, they fight a costly war. The key insight is that, due to those costs, a range of settlements mutually preferable to war always exists. Thus any good theory of war must first explain why states did not reach one of those negotiated settlements.
Review the options below to login to check your access.
Log in with your Cambridge Aspire website account to check access.
If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.