Skip to main content Accessibility help
Internet Explorer 11 is being discontinued by Microsoft in August 2021. If you have difficulties viewing the site on Internet Explorer 11 we recommend using a different browser such as Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Apple Safari or Mozilla Firefox.

Chapter 4: Capacity to conclude treaties

Chapter 4: Capacity to conclude treaties

pp. 55-70

Authors

, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Add bookmark
  • Cite
  • Share

Summary

The making of treaties is one of the oldest and most characteristic exercises of independence or sovereignty on the part of States.

Treaties are made between subjects of international law, in particular, those between states, between states and international organisations, and between international organisations. This book deals primarily with treaties between states. Chapter 22 deals with treaties between states and international organisations, and between international organisations.

Every state possesses the capacity to conclude treaties (Article 6). This chapter is concerned with how the treaty-making power is exercised by a state; by parts of the state, such as the constituent units of a federal state; or by, or on behalf of, overseas territories of a state. It also deals with some special cases at pages 56–60.

A treaty made between states may be expressed to be made by heads of state, or on behalf of the states, their governments or, less often, their ministries or state agencies. A head of state treaty is used when the subject matter is of exceptional political importance, such as the various constituent treaties of the European Union, though it is not necessary for heads of state to sign in person, and constitutional monarchs do not usually sign anyway. There is no difference in international law between a treaty concluded on behalf of states and one concluded on behalf of governments, ministries or state agencies, since a treaty entered into by a government, ministry or state agency binds the state, and a change of government will, in itself, not affect its binding force. For this purpose, ‘state’ generally does not include public bodies that have legal personality separate from that of the state. However, under some constitutions it may be necessary or desirable to use the inter-state form when the provisions of the treaty need to be given full effect in domestic law.

Access options

Review the options below to login to check your access.

Purchase options

There are no purchase options available for this title.

Have an access code?

To redeem an access code, please log in with your personal login.

If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.

Also available to purchase from these educational ebook suppliers