All political history shows that the standing of the Government and its ability to hold the confidence of the electorate at a General Election depend on the success of its economic policy.
Harold Wilson (as quoted in Hibbs, 1982c)In this part of the book we present four applications of the public choice approach to explaining real-world phenomena. The first application tries to explain the macroeconomic policies of governments. To what extent are these determined by the competitive struggle for votes? To what extent do voters take into account the macroeconomic performance of a government when deciding how to vote? These questions have elicited a variety of theoretical models to explain governmental macroeconomic policies and a gigantic number of empirical studies. Indeed, probably no other area of public choice has witnessed as much empirical testing of its propositions as this area of politico-macroeconomic models. Alas, as too often happens with empirical work, not all authors reach the same conclusions as to what “the data show,” and the literature is therefore filled with often spirited exchanges. We shall not attempt to resolve all of the outstanding disagreements, but will try instead to give the reader a feel for the nature of the debate on various issues and the weight of the empirical support on each side of a question. We begin with the question that Harold Wilson obviously considered an established fact. Does the state of the economy affect how voters vote?
Review the options below to login to check your access.
Log in with your Cambridge Aspire website account to check access.
If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.