Due to scheduled maintenance there may be a short period of time when you may not be able to log in with your personal account to the Cambridge Aspire website. If you encounter a problem please try again in 20 minutes.
As every student of government should know, the administrative process is shaped not only by executive and legislature but also by courts. This chapter focuses on the judicial contribution in the form of procedural review, classically associated with the two Latin tags: audi alteram partem (hear the other side) and nemo iudex in causa sua (no one a judge in his own cause). Suitably hallowed, even hackneyed, the precept that ‘justice must not only be done but be seen to be done’ is of the essence of the rule of law. Ridge v. Baldwin famously ushered in a more vigorous concept of procedural fairness in the context of the extended administrative state (see p. XXX above). Running alongside the rise of managerialism and marketisation and latterly austerity, the development has picked up pace in the last few decades with successive and overlapping forms of groundbreaking intervention.
Review the options below to login to check your access.
Log in with your Cambridge Aspire website account to check access.
If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.