To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Recent reports into the situation in Scottish schools have identified concerning trends in terms of the mental wellbeing and behaviour of young learners. The Scottish Government, through various policy initiatives, has sought to devise and implement strategies with a view to bringing about improvements in these areas. As part of this commitment, it has indicated that the health and wellbeing of learners must be the responsibility of all teachers across the curriculum. This article examines how the teaching of classical literature can contribute to this through the development of emotional literacy as a reflection, reinforcement, and extension of the explicit lessons on emotion delivered through the Personal and Social Education curricular programme.
This study investigates Turkish-speaking children’s reliability attributions to linguistic indicators of evidential source and whether source reliability has an effect on knowledge generalizability. Ninety-six four- and six-year-olds were first asked to perform a reliability judgement task where informants used the indirect evidential marker -mIş in the contexts of inference and hearsay. Next, they were randomly assigned to three groups and introduced a novel object “blicket” declared to be magnetic, using inference, hearsay, and generic statements, and their generalization behaviours were measured. Results showed that both four- and six-year-olds attributed higher reliability to inference compared to hearsay as evidential source, and six-year-olds did so more than four-year-olds. Four-year-olds generalized more in response to generic statements than inferential or hearsay statements, whereas six-year-olds generalized similarly in all conditions. Although children attributed more reliability to inference than hearsay, they did not generalize inferential statements more than hearsay statements.
We study how COVID-19 affected the ownership co-location network of French multinationals over 2012–2022. Using INSEE’s LiFi, we build annual country-industry co-location networks and assess robustness via topology (density, centralization, assortativity, and clustering) and edge survival (Weighted Jaccard). We then test for post-shock shifts in the determinants of dyadic co-location with multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure. Three results emerge. First, the network’s core is robust: topology shows no discontinuity and centrality persists. Second, adaptation is continuous at the margin: around one-third of edges rewire, concentrated in the periphery while core ties endure. Third, after 2020 the determinants of tie weights change, with a reduced role for gravity-like factors and greater cross-sector rebalancing. Thus the system is structurally robust with active peripheral adjustment. Rather than strict resilience in the sense of a return to the pre-COVID configuration, we observe durable strategic reweighting.
How do citizens in Sierra Leone perceive the legitimacy and feasibility of sanctioning their chiefs outside of elections? This study investigates perceptions of non-electoral sanctions through a pre-registered survey experiment in Sierra Leone. We find that citizens view indirect sanctions – such as appealing to higher authorities – as more legitimate and feasible than direct actions, and that the range of acceptable sanctions expands with the severity of the offense. Community elders’ involvement increases the perceived legitimacy of sanctions, highlighting their role as political intermediaries. Finally, respondents’ social status moderates their perceptions of both the legitimacy and the feasibility of sanctions. These results suggest that even in highly hierarchical settings, citizens may retain some capacity to discipline chiefs, though accountability seems primarily mediated through vertical institutions rather than direct collective action.
Learning has recently played a vital role in control engineering, producing numerous applications and facilitating easier control over systems; however, it has presented serious challenges in flight learning for unmanned platforms. Iterative learning control (ILC) is a practical method for cases needing repetition in control loops. This work focuses on the ILC of a quadrotor flight. An unstable flight might lead to a crash in the system and stop the iterations; hence, a base controller, the state-dependent Riccati equation (SDRE), is selected to stabilize the drone in the first loop. The ILC acts on top of the SDRE to increase the precision and force the system to learn to track trajectories better. The combination of ILC and SDRE was tested for stationary (fixed-base) systems without the risk of crashes; nonetheless, its implementation on a flying (mobile) system is reported for the first time. The gradient descent method shapes the training criteria for error reduction in the ILC. The proposed design is implemented on simulation and a real flight of a quadrotor in a series of tests, showing the effectiveness of the proposed input law. The nonlinear and optimal structure of the base controller and the complex iterative learning programming were challenges of this work, which were successfully addressed and demonstrated experimentally.
The entangled relations of humanity’s natural and digital ecosystems are discussed in terms of the risk-uncertainty conundrum. The discussion focuses on global warming from the perspective of the small world of geoengineering, with a particular focus on geothermal energy, marine geoengineering, and the political economy of mitigation and adaptation (section 1). It inquires into the large world of the biosphere, Anthropocene, and uncertainties created by the overlay of human and geological time (section 2). And it scrutinizes the technosphere, consciousness, and language as humanity’s arguably most important cultural technology (section 3).
This chapter takes its departure from the views expressed by Newtonian humanism, post-Newtonianism, and para-humanism that shape different conceptualizations of power as an instrument of calculable control in small worlds and as a source of incalculable protean power in large ones (section 1). By way of summary, it shows how both kinds of power have operated in the domains of risk and uncertainty in finance, nuclear crisis, and global warming/AI discussed in chapters 4–6 (section 2) and in another ten cases. As the main source of the modern conception of control power Thomas Hobbes articulates a rigid, authoritarian theory of language that fits into a Newtonianism formalized about forty years after Hobbes had published Leviathan. Niels Bohr’s post-Newtonian perspective and its permissive core construct of complementarity differ profoundly from Hobbes’s insistence on the necessity of a sovereign’s total control of language. During the last half century updates of these two positions by social theorist Michel Foucault and physicist-feminist Karen Barad have clarified further the yawning gap that separates them (section 3). The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of Machiavelli’s understanding of fortuna and the potentialities of protean power (section 4).
This chapter sorts out how we can distinguish small worlds and conditions of risk from large worlds and conditions of uncertainty along three dimensions (section 1). Unnoticed by students of world politics, in many domains of knowledge the twentieth century saw an important collective shift in terminological resources from Newtonian humanism to post-Newtonianism and para-humanism. These two worldviews are therefore discussed (in sections 2 and 3). Both engage uncertainty more openly than Newtonian humanism does. In any field of study, including world politics, “speaking differently” in a new conceptual language can make distinct contributions to understanding – contributions that can be as important as “arguing well” by relying on conventional terminology. In this case, speaking differently helps us rethink the risk-uncertainty conundrum.
The distinct size and shape of breasts in women is a uniquely human trait. This trait has no conclusive explanation as it is not a requirement for milk production. Additionally, breasts are already enlarged at puberty, which is usually long before the first pregnancy. We hypothesized that the perennially enlarged human breasts were potentially developed to support infant’s thermal balance by providing increased warming surface in skin-to-skin contact.
To test the hypothesis, we measured breast surface temperature to explore their heating capacity and resilience to temperature changes in an environmental conditions laboratory. Volunteers, divided in groups of nursing women, non-nursing women, and men, were exposed to three temperatures: 32°C, 27°C, and 18°C. The exposure time in each temperature was 20 min. The changes in breast surface temperature were recorded by thermal imaging camera. Data were analysed using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Breastfeeding women had overall higher mammary surface temperature compared to other groups. Furthermore, nursing women had distinct resilience against cooling environment: they lost the average of 2.5°C of their mammary surface temperature, whereas other study groups lost 4.3°C and 4.7°C of surface temperature, respectively. This proof-of -concept study clearly indicated the potential of the nursing women’s breasts to support infant’s thermal balance.
In an era of interconnected crises – from climate change to biodiversity loss – transformative solutions require collaboration at scale. This chapter explores how public-private-philanthropic partnerships (4Ps) can unlock new funding models, amplify impact, and drive systemic change. It introduces pooled funds as a game-changing approach, demonstrating how aggregating resources across sectors can mobilize capital for high-impact initiatives.
Through compelling case studies, the chapter illustrates how aligned interests between businesses, governments, and philanthropy can catalyze sustainable development – from empowering smallholder farmers to financing global land restoration efforts. It also confronts the challenges hindering 4Ps from reaching their full potential and offers actionable strategies for overcoming them.
The world is racing against time to finance the transition to a low-carbon economy, yet less than 2% of global philanthropic capital is directed toward climate solutions. Meanwhile, institutional investors control trillions in assets but hesitate to fund green infrastructure in emerging markets, citing high risks and fragmented markets.
This chapter presents the Green Development and Investment Accelerator (GDIA) – a bold new mechanism that leverages philanthropy to de-risk investment opportunities, lower capital costs, and mobilize large-scale private finance for climate action. By integrating philanthropy into a structured five-step de-risking process, GDIA aims to align policies, optimize sectoral coordination, and scale investible projects for institutional investors. A call to action for foundations, policymakers, and private investors, this chapter argues that philanthropy’s greatest impact lies not just in grants, but in unlocking billions for climate finance.
This article introduces a fungal framework, both metaphorically and methodologically, for reimagining power, resistance, and world-making in International Relations (IR). Drawing on relational ontologies and ecological insights, it examines how fungal processes of decomposition and regeneration shed light on the entangled relations that constitute the pluriverse—a world of many worlds. By centering decay as a site of transformation, the framework proposes an ethic of research grounded in humility and care. It critiques the epistemic closures that structure dominant IR paradigms and offers tools for engaging ontological multiplicity beyond Eurocentric frames. In doing so, the article contributes to emerging debates on decolonial methodology, more-than-human agency, and pluriversal ethics, advocating for approaches that accompany, rather than assimilate, multiple worlds.
With the global funding gap for sustainable development widening, the private sector is emerging as a critical force in unlocking catalytic capital. This chapter explores how businesses and financial institutions are shifting from traditional corporate social responsibility (CSR) to strategic impact-driven investments that de-risk projects, attract capital, and drive systemic change.
Through real-world case studies from leading global corporations – Philips, UBS, Unilever, BNP Paribas, and Allianz – this chapter demonstrates how blended finance, public-private-philanthropic partnerships, and innovative funding mechanisms are mobilizing billions toward high-impact solutions. From health care transformation in Africa to blue finance for marine conservation, the private sector is rethinking its role in global development. This chapter makes a compelling case for businesses as catalysts of impact, bridging the gap between profit and purpose.