Skip to main content Accessibility help
Internet Explorer 11 is being discontinued by Microsoft in August 2021. If you have difficulties viewing the site on Internet Explorer 11 we recommend using a different browser such as Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Apple Safari or Mozilla Firefox.

Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident

Chapter 23: Mental Illness and the Criminal Justice System

Chapter 23: Mental Illness and the Criminal Justice System

pp. 467-492

Authors

Virginia Aldigé Hiday, Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, Bradley Ray, Assistant Professor, School of Public Health and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianpolis
  • Add bookmark
  • Cite
  • Share

Summary

Hiday and Ray examine two prevailing beliefs about mental illness and the criminal justice system: that deinstitutionalization has led to the criminalization of mental illness and that persons with mental illness are dangerous and likely to commit crimes. The chapter reviews the available empirical evidence for these beliefs. Although arrest rates and incarceration rates are indeed higher for people with mental illness than for the general population, criminalization may be an inaccurate characterization. Furthermore, most people with mental illnesses are not violent, and only a small proportion becomes violent. The chapter goes on to examine how people with mental illness are handled by the criminal justice system. The authors suggest that there are five subgroups of people with severe mental illness who come into contact with the criminal justice system: (1) those committing only misdemeanor nuisance offenses; (2) those committing offenses involving survival behaviors; (3) those who abuse alcohol and drugs, which lead to high rates of criminal offenses from the use of illegal substances, from attempts to support their habits, and from violence arising out of their use; (4) those with a character disorder who have high rates of felonious criminal offending, especially for violence against others; and (5) a much smaller subgroup whose members fit the stereotypical image of a severely disordered person driven to criminally violent actions by delusions. All five groups tend to live in impoverished, disorganized communities where it is difficult to survive with a major mental illness. The authors conclude that the criminal justice system is left to pick up the pieces after the failure of other social institutions. What types of social stressors contribute to the criminalization of the mentally ill? What failures of social institutions have led to the incarceration of those with mental illnesses?

Introduction

Two prevailing beliefs held by the public (and many professionals) connect mental illness to the criminal justice system: first, a belief that deinstitutionalization has led to the criminalization of mental illness, and second, a belief that people with a mental illness are dangerous and likely to commit crimes, especially violent crimes. The first two sections of this chapter examine the evidence to ascertain whether and to what extent empirical evidence supports these beliefs. The third section describes how people with mental illness are handled and fare in the criminal justice system and after their release.

About the book

Access options

Review the options below to login to check your access.

Purchase options

Purchasing is temporarily unavailable, please try again later

Have an access code?

To redeem an access code, please log in with your personal login.

If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.

Also available to purchase from these educational ebook suppliers