Skip to main content Accessibility help
Internet Explorer 11 is being discontinued by Microsoft in August 2021. If you have difficulties viewing the site on Internet Explorer 11 we recommend using a different browser such as Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Apple Safari or Mozilla Firefox.

Chapter 4: The Dual Continua Model: The Foundation of the Sociology of Mental Health and Mental Illness

Chapter 4: The Dual Continua Model: The Foundation of the Sociology of Mental Health and Mental Illness

pp. 66-81

Authors

Corey L. M. Keyes, Winship Distinquished Professor, Emory University
  • Add bookmark
  • Cite
  • Share

Summary

There are three ways to conceive of mental health. The pathogenic approach views mental health as the absence of mental illness. The salutogenic approach views mental health as the presence of positive emotional states and positive functioning. The third approach is the complete state model, which derives from the ancient word for health as being hale, meaning whole. This approach is exemplified in the World Health Organization's definition of health as a complete state, where mental health consists of the absence of mental illness and the presence of positive emotional states and positive functioning. This chapter reviews evidence supporting the complete state model, showing strong empirical support for the two continua model at the phenotypic and genotypic levels. Studies are reviewed making the case for promoting and protecting positive mental health to prevent mental illness and to improve overall psychosocial functioning of individuals and population health. So, is illness more serious than health? Is it enough to seek cures, treatment, and protection from disease and illness as the way toward achieving better mental health? The complete state model would answer “no” to both questions – why? What would it mean to focus on increasing population mental health, as opposed to reducing mental illness?

Introduction

Mental illness has always been a problem, but never serious enough to be considered a public health issue until 1996, when the World Health Organization published the results of the first Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study (Murray & Lopez, 1996). The GBD study estimated the total contribution of 107 acute and chronic medical conditions and illnesses by including disability in the equation to calculate disability-adjusted life years (DALY). The DALY reflects the total number of years in a population that were either lived with disability or abbreviated prematurely due to death that is attributable to specific physical or mental conditions. Depression was the fourth leading cause of disease burden, accounting for 3.7 percent of DALY in 1990, 4.4 percent in 2000, and projected to be 15 percent of DALY by 2020 (Üstün, 1999; Üstün, Ayuso-Mateos, Chatterji, Mathers, & Murray, 2004).

The debate is no longer about whether mental illness, and depression in particular, are a public health issue. Rather, the next debate is what can be done to reduce the number of cases of mental illness and those suffering from it.

About the book

Access options

Review the options below to login to check your access.

Purchase options

eTextbook
US$67.99
Hardback
US$163.00
Paperback
US$67.99

Have an access code?

To redeem an access code, please log in with your personal login.

If you believe you should have access to this content, please contact your institutional librarian or consult our FAQ page for further information about accessing our content.

Also available to purchase from these educational ebook suppliers