In her 1983 How to Suppress Women’s Writing, feminist science fiction author Joanna Russ outlined the many approaches used to ignore, condemn, or otherwise belittle the intellectual productions by members of the “wrong” groups.1 In addition to discouragement and blocking access to requisite materials and training, other regular tactics include isolating a given author or one of their texts from the tradition to which they or it belong and simply “ignoring the works, the workers, and the whole tradition,” which Russ considers both most common and most difficult to combat.2 Among the many contributions of Temin’s Remapping Sovereignty is his actively counteracting the ignoring of “the works, the workers, and the whole tradition” by refusing to isolate the six individual North American Indigenous political thinkers who are his focus from the larger, internally diverse, dynamic political worlds of which they are part. Far from monolithic or univocal, what emerges is an intergenerational multi-nation effort to articulate aspirations and concerted action that respond with dignity and power to distinct and overlapping moments in ongoing processes of settler-colonial genocide and dispossession.

This essay explores the formation of the Syria-Turkey border by examining the mobility of contraband merchants and couriers. Contraband commerce can be viewed as not only a technique of mobility but a technology of sovereignty. I parse out these linkages from within the semantic domain of kaçak (contraband; literally “fugitive”) repurposed in the hands of contraband merchants, investigative journalists, and state officials. At important historical junctures, contraband commerce between modern Turkey and Syria came to link regimes of value and territorialization, border delineation and land dispossession, and economic informality and political treason. Analyzing the paradoxically uneven distribution of physical mobility and transborder transactions among the inhabitants of the border as a central tenet of territorialization, I suggest conceptualizing the border as a palimpsest of sovereignty. This essay contends that such an approach recuperates the historicity and dynamism of arrested mobilities and their role in the spatial production of borders, and of other contingent forms they give to sovereignty over geography and history.

This study examines Norwegian veterans’ construction of meaning of the war in Afghanistan with two main objectives. A first aim is to add empirically to research on veterans’ meaning-making, querying into veterans’ construction of meaning after failure in a recent military operation. A thematic analysis of interviews with fifteen veterans illustrates how, despite their own admission of the war’s limited overall achievements, Norwegian veterans rendered the war meaningful. They emphasised that they had done their job, realised themselves as individuals, experienced community, made a difference ‘then and there’, and served their country. Working towards a second aim – to enhance scholarly understanding of civil–military dynamics in relation to veterans’ experiences – the study discusses implications of this meaning-making for Norwegian civil–military relations. Two main arguments are set forth: (1) a significant discrepancy in the construction of meaning among veterans compared to the Norwegian public illustrates a societal–military gap in evaluations of the war and (2) a reciprocal distance between veterans and politics and society demonstrates a weakness in civilian control of the Norwegian Armed Forces. By way of conclusion, the study reflects on consequences of its findings.

This article offers a critical analysis of the song “Female Song for the Resurrection of Our Lord,” found in the colonial manuscript titled Cantares mexicanos. While seemingly a Christian hymn, a close reading of this song reveals deep continuities with pre-Hispanic Nahua religious thought, cosmology, and ritual language. Through contextualized textual analysis grounded in ethnohistorical scholarship, the study uncovers the song’s hybrid nature and the Indigenous conceptual models embedded within its Christian language and imagery. The article places the song within the evangelization efforts of sixteenth-century Franciscan friars in New Spain, highlighting the role of Native authors, singers and translators in shaping Indigenous devotional expression. It argues that the analyzed piece functioned not merely as a catechetical tool but as a site of cultural negotiation, where Christian themes were reinterpreted through Indigenous frameworks—most notably, by aligning Saint Francis with the Nahua corn deities, whose cult, associated with regeneration, sustenance, and cyclical vegetation renewal, coincided with Easter celebrations. Though rarely studied, this song contributes meaningfully to debates on syncretism, Indigenous authorship, and resistance in early colonial Christian literature. Emphasizing the agency of Native intermediaries, the article reveals the dialogic nature of missionary textual production and offers a more nuanced understanding of the Cantares mexicanos corpus.

Joint clinical assessments (JCAs) under the European Union (EU) Regulation 2021/2282 on health technology assessment (HTA-R) and its implementing regulations have been linked to various implementation challenges. However, legal implications of practically relevant issues have mostly remained unexplored. This study investigated potential legal implications of disparities regarding patient population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICOs) in JCAs from respective member states (MSs), and of managing conflicts of interest (CoIs) of experts involved in a JCA. Moreover, we discussed potential consequences for patient access. JCA reports are not legally binding for MS; PICO disparities can underpin the required justification for their non-consideration at national level. Legal action against negative reimbursement decisions due to unjustified non-consideration falls under national jurisdiction. Furthermore, too strict CoI management might leave perspectives of MSs with fewer experts and thus a higher chance of CoI occurrence unheard, requiring corresponding expert elicitation at national level. These implications might lead to an increased workload for health technology developers and national HTA bodies, potentially fostering marketing strategies and access delays. Thorough scoping processes and prioritising the need for a JCA’s scientific excellence could facilitate more streamlined national HTA procedures and accelerated patient access.

Small, isolated populations of cold-adapted species at the edge of their climatic range are highly sensitive to environmental change, making them powerful ecological indicators. Cetraria sepincola (Ehrh.) Ach. is an epiphytic lichen which illustrates this role. It is common in Nordic countries, but in the southern parts of its European range, its distribution has become fragmented and restricted to cold habitats. We studied populations in habitats of high conservation value such as wetlands, montane stone fields, and wooded meadows in south-west Germany, where it persists at the edge of its ecological range in Central Europe and is becoming increasingly rare. Its dependence on specific climatic conditions and selectivity in its photobiont associations make it particularly responsive to shifts in climate and land use. Through historical records, recent observations, data on nitrogen deposition and associated species, we identified key environmental factors shaping the distribution of C. sepincola. Our analysis confirms that populations in south-west Germany occur at the climatic margin of the species’ Central European range. We also found that high-density local populations are linked to low ammonia (NH3) concentrations. Cetraria sepincola associated specifically with Trebouxia lineages from clade S (e.g. OTU S28 = Trebouxia barrenoae and OTU S27), commonly found in lichens from acidic substrates. We found the same Trebouxia lineages in the co-occurring acidophyte Hypogymnia physodes (L.) Nyl., a likely local photobiont donor for C. sepincola, which lacks asexual propagules. At some sites, species of the nitrophytic Xanthorion community started to colonize the same twigs as C. sepincola. In our study area, typically more nitrophytic species from the families Teloschistaceae (e.g. Polycauliona polycarpa (Hoffm.) Frödén et al., Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th. Fr.) and Physciaceae (Physcia adscendens H. Olivier) host Trebouxia algae from clades which are incompatible with C. sepincola. The spread of nitrophytic species and their associated photobionts into formerly acidophytic communities could also reduce the likelihood of finding compatible photobionts for C. sepincola. Climate change, possible direct toxic effects of NH3 on the mycobiont, and indirect impact of NH3 on the lichen and photobiont community exacerbate the extinction risk for sensitive lichens, particularly at the edge of their distribution range.

Since the 1960s, Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) scholars1 have argued that decolonization requires more than formal sovereignty; it demands equal participation by low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly post-colonial states, in meaningfully shaping the rules of international order. The global health governance system, however, was largely constructed within a post-World War II order and, thus, reproduced rather than dismantled imperial hierarchies. Power and agenda-setting authority remained concentrated in former colonial states, Western hegemonic powers, and newly created international institutions that entrenched asymmetrical decision making. Over the past eight decades, global health governance has thus been disproportionately shaped by Global North actors, limiting the ability of many states to exercise meaningful agency and influence. The result has been a persistent erosion of principles of equitable global health and international law, including a core principle of participation, rooted not in the absence of legal recognition but in the centralized allocation of authority within global health institutions and organizations.2

Feedback is integral to second language (L2) writing instruction. However, large class sizes and limited teacher time often challenge the delivery of personalized feedback, prompting interest in AI-powered solutions such as ChatGPT (Escalante et al., 2023; Huete-García & Tarp, 2024; Steiss et al., 2024; Yoon et al., 2023; Zhang, 2024). This study evaluates a task-customized GPT model, “Belinda,” trained to assess A1-level Spanish learners’ writing and provide feedback. Two research questions guided the investigation: (1) Can Belinda accurately score beginner Spanish writing using a provided rubric? (2) Can Belinda deliver constructive qualitative feedback? Human and GPT-generated scores were compared for inter- and intrarater reliability, and qualitative analyses categorized the feedback for usability in the classroom. Results revealed moderate alignment between Belinda’s scores and human raters, though reliability of the GPT fell short of calibration benchmarks. Feedback quality varied, with Belinda often providing vague, incomplete, or inaccurate suggestions. Despite iterative training, the GPT struggled to balance error correction with encouragement, a critical need for novice learners. Additionally, inconsistencies in identical GPT versions raised concerns about reliability. While Belinda showed potential in automating feedback, its limitations in accuracy, contextual understanding, and positivity suggest it is not yet a viable substitute for human evaluation by itself. These findings emphasize the challenges of integrating AI into L2 instruction and call for the need for extensive datasets, robust training, and human–AI collaboration to achieve pedagogically sound outcomes. Future research should explore hybrid feedback models and scalable solutions to enhance AI’s role in language education without compromising learner progress or confidence.

This study evaluated the sublethal and demographic effects of deltamethrin, cypermethrin, and chlorantraniliprole on the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). The age–stage, two-sex life table model was used to assess population parameters following exposure to LC₃₀, LC₄₀, and LC₅₀ concentrations of each insecticide under laboratory conditions. Sublethal treatments significantly affected developmental time, longevity, fecundity, and overall population fitness. The total pre-adult duration increased from 11.66 days in the control to 18.07 days under deltamethrin LC₅₀ exposure. Adult longevity decreased from 18.06 days in the control to 11.52, 13.92, and 14.18 days for deltamethrin, cypermethrin, and chlorantraniliprole LC₅₀, respectively. Fecundity was severely reduced, declining from 57.69 nymphs per female in the control to 10.63, 21.57, and 28.92 at LC₅₀ of the respective insecticides. Demographic analysis showed that the intrinsic rate of increase (r) and finite rate of increase (λ) significantly decreased with increasing concentration. The control population exhibited r = 0.346 day−1 and λ = 1.413 day−1, whereas these values dropped to 0.097 and 1.101 under deltamethrin LC₅₀, 0.165 and 1.179 under cypermethrin LC₅₀, and 0.198 and 1.219 under chlorantraniliprole LC₅₀. Conversely, mean generation time (T) increased from 11.66 to 18.07 days. Overall, deltamethrin caused the most severe demographic suppression, followed by cypermethrin and chlorantraniliprole. These findings demonstrate that sublethal insecticide exposure can markedly disrupt the life history and population growth of R. padi, underscoring the necessity of integrating sublethal effect evaluations into ecological risk assessment and IPM programs.

We examine the “problem of social change”, focusing on whether efforts should be oriented toward long-term ideals or piecemeal improvements. We analyse the trade-off between these approaches: pursuing ideals may require short-term sacrifices, while incremental changes may hinder realizing an ideal. We introduce an analytical framework for structuring thought experiments that can provide traction on these issues, and present two implementations that provide baseline insights and motivate further research. We conclude with suggestions for extending our framework in ways that can yield insights that can guide our choice of orientation.

This article examines representations of the Modern English Speaker of Korean (MESK) in the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), as lexicographers listened to and documented the language of this figure over the past century. I show that, until the early twenty-first century, the most salient type of MESK was the Koreanist, a white, masculine expert on and translator of Korean, the language of a racial other. By contrast, more recent Korean entries, influenced by the global spread of hallyu, have invoked the Korea Fan, a figure that potentially unsettles longstanding ideologies of language, race, and gender. I argue, however, that the dictionary’s techniques of linguistic regimentation continue to represent the MESK, even when expressing Korean fandom, as fundamentally aligned with the Koreanist.

Colonial borderlands provide an opportunity to study innovation of new foodways and persistence of traditional ones amid unfamiliar and potentially risky environments and dynamic cultural contexts. Archaeological research in northern New Spain has revealed foodways diversity as Spaniards attempted to replicate agropastoral systems and Indigenous peoples incorporated, to varying extents, new plants and animals into their culinary practices. These processes remain relatively unknown in Spanish Tejas. Here we present new zooarchaeological data from Mission Dolores in eastern Texas, synthesizing these data with a review of other Tejas missions and presidios. Written records indicate that Mission Dolores occupants struggled to provision themselves and to convert Indigenous Ais but had trade relations with neighboring French. We investigate the nature of the food system, the likelihood of self-provisioning, and culinary processing. We show that cattle were the dominant meat source, and wild fauna were rarely consumed. Mortality profiles indicate slaughter of prime age animals, while skeletal part representation, and three-dimensional visualizations of cut marks, indicate butchery of whole carcasses on site. Our findings contrast with documents implying resource stress at Mission Dolores and unexpectedly show that Mission Dolores occupants were almost solely reliant on ranching, compared with other Tejas missions and presidios.

The Irish Supreme Court’s decision in Kelly v UCD1 is a significant ruling on judicial bias and disqualification. It is the first case to consider the implications of familial connections between judges and law firms representing parties since the Judicial Conduct Committee published its Guidelines on Judicial Conduct and Ethics in 2022.2 The case clarifies the legal test for objective bias, delineates its boundaries, and addresses the role of judicial conduct guidelines in disqualification decisions. It also has broader implications for other common law jurisdictions, particularly England & Wales, where similar issues of judicial propriety and public confidence in impartial adjudication arise.