This article revisits the history of Muslim Turkish society, questioning its essentialist portrayal as a “religious society,” with religiosity narrowly defined through Sunni Islamic doctrines. It examines the content of Sunni folk Islam through the Mevlid, Karbala, and Ebâ Müslim books published by İstanbul Maarif Kitaphanesi until the 1980s, as well as their political appropriation by elite actors during the early Cold War period. I argue that Sunni and Alevi religiosity shared key elements beyond saint veneration, particularly praising the Prophet through Nur Muhammad, love of Ahl Al-Bayt, and mourning for Karbala. Using these books as religious media through a material approach to religion, I maintain that they made Muhammad and Ahl Al-Bayt “accessible,” “tangible,” and “sense-able” in the world in oral, pictorial, and scriptural forms. Since the publishers, editors, authors, readers, and listeners of these books were descendants of Turkish speakers dating back to the twelfth century, I propose the term “Islam in Turkish” as a conceptual framework to capture these shared elements. I argue that this concept, denoting a vernacular form of religiosity, has the potential to replace the modern category of Turkish folk Islam and contribute to global critical discussions on Islam.

Recent scholarship devotes considerable attention to how social identities influence vote choice. However, group sympathies or group affect constitute another, often overlooked subjective component of the relationship between social groups and vote choice. Based on reference group theory and drawing on ANES data as well as recent Danish and Austrian election surveys, we examine how voters’ sympathies with a range of groups are related to party choice across time and space. We find that group sympathies are related to vote choice in all three countries, even when controlling for objective group memberships and social identities. Across time, most relationships are stable or strengthening and comparable in strength to the relationship between group memberships and party choice. The relationship between group sympathies and vote choice is, furthermore, conditioned by perceived linkages between groups and parties. Hence, analyses of the role of social groups in voting also need to include group sympathies to grasp the full influence of social groups.

For Global South countries who faced vaccine inequity during the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of an equitable Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) system is considered to be “at the heart of the political bargain”1 of a pandemic agreement, and is critically important to prevent a repetition of vaccine inequity in future pandemics. These countries want to ensure that they have equitable access to pandemic products developed using genetic sequence data (GSD) or digital sequence information (DSI) from their geographies. A repeat of pandemic history, where GSD was uploaded from the Global South (such as from China, and from Botswana in the case of the Omicron variant), with Global South countries receiving a lower proportion of vaccine supply, would be abhorrent.

We use spectral theory and algebraic geometry to establish a higher-degree analogue of a Szemerédi–Trotter-type theorem over finite fields, with an application to polynomial expansion.

This article considers the function of American food and its exchange at the time of the Allied occupation of Italy to revisit the complexity of the encounter with the local population. Through unpublished diaries and confidential reports of the Psychological Warfare Branch, as well as video materials, published interviews and published diaries, the article makes the issues around food central to the understanding of the dynamics of the Italian occupation. While contributing to the growing literature on food availability in the Second World War, the article expands in particular on the historic function of American comfort food and rations, to explore the experience of the Italian occupation through the interactions of gifting, bartering and black market trade. It illuminates the complexity of mutual perceptions shaped by hope, nostalgia, supremacy, and fairness. It concludes with a reading of John Hersey’s A Bell for Adano, which, as a cultural product, brings together and makes valid for future generations, the contrasting image of a benign and a damaging occupation explored in the article.

The global rise of deliberative democratic innovations, particularly minipublics such as citizens’ assemblies and deliberative polls, has been marked by uneven adoption across advanced democracies. While some countries have integrated these mechanisms into their democratic frameworks, others remain hesitant, raising questions about the institutional conditions that facilitate or hinder their adoption. This study employs qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to examine how configurations of three key institutional dimensions – consensus democracy, federalism, and direct democracy – shape the adoption of minipublics. Our findings reveal that minipublics are more likely to be adopted in majoritarian systems with strong federalism and limited direct democracy, where they address participatory gaps. Conversely, systems combining high consensus democracy and extensive direct democratic mechanisms, such as Switzerland, often exhibit lower adoption rates, as existing power-sharing structures fulfil similar deliberative functions.

The health crisis of COVID-19 has provoked a pivotal moment of global health law reform that comes against larger shifts against international law, democracy, and human rights. In this light, it is perhaps not surprising that state-led amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR)—international law’s primary instrument governing state responses to public health crises—and a prospective Pandemic Agreement—designed to remedy the former’s defects—have shifted away from the language of human rights and toward the sweeping principle of equity. While these changes appear to herald an important normative and legal shift in international law, they also raise longer-standing questions about coherence and fragmentation in international law, and about the future of human rights within international law. In this essay, I first explore larger concerns around coherence and fragmentation in international law, and the practical manifestation of these threats in disparities in access to COVID-19 vaccines. Second, I consider the legal and political implications of the shift to equity in both instruments. I conclude by considering what this move may mean for coherence and human rights in international law.

Placing Lauren Berlant’s concept of “cruel optimism,” in conversation with Tuck and Yang’s work, “Decolonization is Not a Metaphor,” this paper examines affective attachments to mass tree-planting efforts, which encourage unquestioned faith in these initiatives, serving to enable their persistence despite their consistent failures. This paper questions how affective attachments to mass tree-plantings teach publics to remain invested in the ability of settler-colonial institutions to solve climate crises, thereby ensuring that climate crises remain meaningfully unaddressed. Drawing together decolonial scholarship, affect theory, Indigenous thought and scholarship on environmental education, I demonstrate that mainstream tree-planting initiatives do not challenge the logics that permit forest and land degradation, but in fact, reproduce these logics. Rejecting a model which considers the act of planting trees as a success in and of itself, I instead ask what is missed when the planting of a tree is more important than the life of the forest.

It is well known that the dynamical behavior of a rational map $f:\widehat {\mathbb C}\to \widehat {\mathbb C}$ is governed by the forward orbits of the critical points of f. The map f is said to be postcritically finite if every critical point has finite forward orbit, or equivalently, if every critical point eventually maps into a periodic cycle of f. We encode the orbits of the critical points of f with a finite directed graph called a ramification portrait. In this article, we study which graphs arise as ramification portraits. We prove that every abstract polynomial ramification portrait is realized as the ramification portrait of a postcritically finite polynomial and classify which abstract polynomial ramification portraits can only be realized by unobstructed maps.

Researchers have struggled to identify heirs’ property (HP) via the use of real estate records for years. This paper evaluates seven distinct methodological approaches to identify HP using CoreLogic’s national property database. We find minimal convergence among these algorithms, with different methods flagging largely non-overlapping sets of properties. Certain approaches show promise – particularly in identifying properties with characteristics consistent with documented HP patterns. The lack of agreement across methods, however, makes estimating the prevalence of HP difficult. Several paths exist forward to identify HP such as adding extra property characteristics into existing algorithms, developing more sophisticated algorithms, and establishing protocols for cross-jurisdictional validation.

This essay sets out an analysis of how forgery was produced at Westminster Abbey in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, using the material evidence of the pseudo-original charters rather than the much-used textual evidence. The focus of this study thus lies on how the parchments were prepared, how the seals were used, and what techniques the scribes used to produce archaizing scripts, which are not usually prominent in analysis of charters and related materials. This shows that individual scribal habits shaped how the forgeries were made, but, perhaps more importantly, that there were distinctive practices seen in the forgeries which differed from how authentic originals were made. It is argued that these differences reflect how the scribes envisaged the forged documents would be used, and their knowledge that these usages would differ from those of authentic originals.

This paper examines the mobilizing capacity of the middle class in fostering civic activism under authoritarian rule. In particular, we examine whether the middle class has the potential to recruit other strata in civic activism. We use a boutique N=2017 survey conducted in Moscow, Russia, in December 2021, with an embedded conjoint experiment that identifies the reaction of respondents to an invitation from a hypothetical neighbor to take part in a civic action. We find that self-reported willingness to engage in civic activism is positively associated with the share of the middle class in the respondent’s district of residence. Furthermore, middle-class individuals are perceived as more knowledgeable and thus have higher mobilizing capacity; however, we find no evidence that individuals are more likely to be mobilized by someone from a similar social stratum. In districts with a low middle-class share, middle-class individuals exhibit higher willingness to engage in civic activism, but this difference disappears in high-middle-class districts. Finally, for civic activism, unlike the anti-regime protests, we find no evidence that dependence on the state reduces the self-reported willingness to engage in civic activism. A survey-based measure of past civic engagement augments findings from the conjoint experiment. Our findings contribute to research on authoritarian politics by refining our understanding of state–society relations, the middle class, civic activism, and local politics in autocracies, as well as to the general studies of impact of social context on civic activism, with implications beyond the Russian case.

The blue gum chalcid (Leptocybe invasa) is a serious invasive, galling insect pest of eucalypts grown outside Australia. Variability in resistance of species and genotypes of Eucalyptus to the pest is widely reported but without consideration of the influence of silviculture on the severity of galling. We assessed the variability of gall expression by 29 genotypes of E. camaldulensis by L. invasa in common nursery experiments and in 5 common garden arboreta planted in diverse climatic zones and soil types around Kenya. We quantified variation in growth and the concentrations of defensive chemical compounds (namely polyphenolic compounds) to assess possible genotype × environment interactions which we also relate to the climate of the parent seed trees in Australia. Generally, genotypes endemic to low latitude regions of Australia were more resistant to the pest while the concentration of quinic acid derivatives (QUIN) exhibited an interaction with arboretum location in Kenya. The concentration of QUIN in potted plants did not vary significantly with nitrogen supplementation. However, growth rates and total polyphenolic concentrations varied with arboretum location. Since QUIN, which have been previously shown to confer resistance against L. invasa, did not vary in different arboreta, resistant subspecies and genotypes of E. camaldulensis can be deployed in novel habitats and will not be galled. Our findings support the critical need to plant stock of known genotype(s) rather than planting stock grown from locally collected seed. This will require the establishment of eucalypt seed orchards if clonal production of planting stock is not possible.

This digital review examines how feminist data science can inform, challenge, and reshape archaeological knowledge production in an era of expanding digital data infrastructures. Beginning with a historical analysis of the term “feminist” in American Antiquity, I demonstrate that although feminist perspectives have appeared consistently over four decades, such engagement remains limited in scope. Drawing from this context, I argue that the proliferation of online, publicly accessible archaeological datasets requires renewed feminist and decolonial scrutiny. I situate these challenges within broader conversations around FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) and CARE (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics) principles, Indigenous data sovereignty, and moderated openness, highlighting tensions between expanding digital access and resisting colonial datafication. Intersectional feminist data science, particularly the framework proposed by D’Ignazio and Klein (2020), offers actionable principles for confronting inequities embedded within archaeological data structures. I illustrate these principles through a multimodal collaborative project with the Pueblo of Zuni and the Hopi Tribe, which uses film-based storytelling to reframe relationships to ancestral collections and places. The article concludes with a reflection on citation inequities and disciplinary gatekeeping, underscoring how digital data practices can either reproduce or dismantle structural biases. I argue that transforming archaeological data science requires collective courage and sustained commitment to feminist, Indigenous, and community-engaged approaches that expand the inclusivity and ethical integrity of our field.

Oscillations and instabilities in $E\!\times\!B$ plasma discharges play a major role in driving turbulence and anomalous transport. The presence of gradients and applied fields that result in a relative drift between the charged species causes the onset of drift-gradient instabilities. This work puts forward a kinetic approach to the low-frequency stability of $E\!\times\!B$, two-species, partially magnetised plasmas. It presents a local linear analysis of electrostatic modes in the long-wavelength limit, assuming wave propagation perpendicular to the magnetic field. Magnetised electrons are described by a drift-kinetic equation, while unmagnetised ions are described as a cold fluid. This allows for a consistent treatment of electron temperature perturbations in an inhomogeneous plasma that takes into account kinetic resonance effects, changing the threshold conditions for drift instabilities previously found in fluid descriptions. The well-known fluid dispersion relation for the collisionless Simon–Hoh instability is recovered by considering the weak magnetic inhomogeneity limit of our kinetic model and, in addition, a perturbative extension of the instability criterion that includes the gradients of the magnetic field and the electron temperature is obtained.